Re: 12 Reasons Gay Marriage Will Ruin Society
Kollop, You know fokker was joking right? Or are you joking too? ( <-Save Yourself here)
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Politics → 12 Reasons Gay Marriage Will Ruin Society
Kollop, You know fokker was joking right? Or are you joking too? ( <-Save Yourself here)
Fokker wasn't joking. What he posted was supposed to be a joke. It was supposed to be a joke based upon the ridiculousness of "reasons gay marriage will ruin society." Obviously they were not meant seriously (ie literally). But he obviously thought they had some amount of a point to them, otherwise they would be neither humorous or relevant.
>Fokker wasn't joking. What he posted was supposed to be a joke.
What?
What he pasted was supposed to be funny because it's SO ridiculous all these CRAZY reasons people have to object to gay marriage.
Obviously he didn't think they were meant literally. But he thought the 'joke' wasn't retarded.
to paraphrase, you said "Fokker wasn't joking. He was joking."
Leaves me to wonder what your point is and what you're trying to say.
You're obviously a dolt.
What he copied and pasted was a joke. ha ha funny.
His posting it was not some form of subtle humor. He wasn't making fun of the joke; which is, in fact, retarded. He posted a joke. But his posting it wasn't some sort of second level to the joke; he really thought it was worth posting. You're a joke.
I prefer Cesar Romero as teh Joker
So far the only straight person in here who I agree with, and whole heartedly at that, is V.Kemp.
I hope his seed is prolific, if only to saveguard the future of mankind.
___________
On an unrelated subject I hope Avogadro is as fertile as a Mule, for totally unrelated reasons.
A10 is now on my *idiot* list for not being able to grasp the simple concept v.kemp presented to him...
My seed is a little *TOO* prolific lol
It causes me great and insufferable pain that it is illegal that I can not enter a polygamous marriage. I can not be happy unless I am allowed to marry the ten women I love. This oppressive and stupid law against polygamy originates from intolerant and ignorant Christians. They are so intolerant, look what they did to loving mormon polygamous couples in the centuries before.
Ok, V.Kemp lets review. These are all quotes.
I said to someone else
>You know fokker was joking right? Or are you joking too?
then you said
>Fokker wasn't joking.
Then me wondering what you're smoking said
>What?
Then you Said
>You're obviously a dolt.
So Now I'm a
>dolt
And you still haven't explained what you're point is.
I'm pretty sure that if you do have a point it's not relevant to this discussion. If you want to take it up with me you can find me on IRC sometime.
Else you can comment on my last on topic post on page 4.
Or justinians post above ^
Hey A10, I have a response for you:
Blow me.
avogadro didn't have trouble understanding it, which was admittedly drawn out because I didn't expect you'd have so much trouble understanding it to begin with. Whoever questioned/pointed out that he was "joking" to begin with is a moron. That the post was a copy/paste of a stupid joke was obvious and anyone who had to be told this is an idiot. Furthermore, to say that he was "joking" in posting it is at best ambiguous (and that's a stretch) and at worst a misleading statement because it's factually incorrect and misleading to anyone who actually knows and understands communication in the English language. Go to school.
Don't let society get you down, Justinian I. You can still effectively "marry" them all and live in happiness. You can't have legal marriages with all of them, but with parallel legal agreements and wills you can try to obtain most of the rights marriage entails. No one's stopping you from having sex with all of them, buying them houses, cars, tying them up and making them have sex with each other... oh sorry, lil of my preference slipped in.
v.kemp, if you expect everyone to have the capabilities i have, you're going to be disappointed all the time.
LOL. Really.
I disagree. I won't be disappointed all of the time. Just the vast majority of it.
Self-righteous, willful ignorance will be the defining characteristic of my generation. No one cares. They all bitch and moan like they care. They know they want what they want. But there is no inherent value in the truth in their eyes. Virtue is myth of the past to be discarded. It is certainly not integral in a happy life. Honor and dignity have been replaced by convenience, complacence, and expediency. And even these aren't figured out. They're whatever people are told. How long has a civilization peaked when its people have become so morally ambivalent.
I keep saying that I'm terrified for my children. I really am.
/shrugs
No I agree, but remember "thinking you know better" is the final sin
You can't eat computer paste :S.
What will the kindergartenerz of the future do?? Oh why don't you all think of the children?!?
All paste ought to be deadly. Evolution has been too short-circuited in modern society. For the good of the species, the weak and stupid must die!
o.O
/me licks computer paste & catches a Trojan horse virus
>Blow me.
No.
>Evolution has been too short-circuited in modern society. For the good of the species, the weak and stupid must die!
How could you make a case for promotion of homosexual behaviors from an evolutionary standpoint? Behaviors that inhibit succesful reproduction are obviously not healthy for the species. By your own belief system same sex couples should marry and then die.
>No one's stopping you from having sex with all of them, buying them houses, cars,
Oh my F*ing goodness, that's what I've been trying to say about homosexuals through these last 5 pages.
At least you finally get it.
Then you don't support gay marriage. Who are you arguing with?
I didn't 'finally get' anything. I really don't care strongly about the issue. But I figured I'd voice the real objections to homosexual marriage because they do exist in a valid form, as opposed to the garbage rhetoric post that started this thread. From what you just posted you are content with the status quo. Something tells me you're just unable to express yourself without expressly saying the opposite of what you meant. This sort of miscommunication on your end is why I really don't care what you have to say on the matter. How dumb would that be, trying to have a conversation with someone who accidentally says the complete opposite of what they mean on occasion and then talks down to you as if YOU're the idiot! Ridiculous, I know right?
>>How could you make a case for promotion of homosexual behaviors from an evolutionary standpoint?<<
People prone to mental illness not being discouraged from practicing a homosexual lifestyle weeds out those psychologically deficient individuals from the gene pool who might otherwise persue hetersexual sexuality and produce offspring. I just did it in a sentence. I bet you're surprised a lot, huh.
>Then you don't support gay marriage.
There's never been any ambiguity in my position.
>Who are you arguing with?
Your condescending and hostile language made me forget who I was originally talking to. Your hostile language made me think it was you. You likely fell under the same logical trap when you forgot my position (^) after my retalitory condescending language.
I told you that if you had anything else to say to me to tell me on irc. I will not read nor respond to any more of your posts concerning this BS on the forum.
And Back on topic
>People prone to mental illness not being discouraged from practicing a homosexual lifestyle weeds out those psychologically deficient individuals from the gene pool who might otherwise persue hetersexual sexuality and produce offspring.
That's an interesting idea if homosexuality was inherited genetically.
Because homosexuality has been shown to be at least partly environmental and because individuals are likely to repeat behaviors that they have experienced in their childhood, homosexual couples should not be given marriage rights so that concentrations of environmental factors that negatively effect sexuality are avoided. >>I just did it in a sentence. I bet you're surprised a lot, huh.<<
>>That's an interesting idea if homosexuality was inherited genetically.<<
I was talking about those prone to psychological problems being those who most often get them; for example, homosexuality. So it's not dependant on homosexuality being genetic, which I have never claimed.
"People prone to mental illness not being discouraged from practicing a homosexual lifestyle weeds out those psychologically deficient individuals from the gene pool who might otherwise persue hetersexual sexuality and produce offspring. I just did it in a sentence. I bet you're surprised a lot, huh."
Guess what team most sperm-donors bat for?
Oh, and if you don't mind I'd like to open a new thread for the discussion of wether or not homosexuality is a mental illness, based on your post.
Hmm who did wilt chamberlain play for?
Imperial Forum → Politics → 12 Reasons Gay Marriage Will Ruin Society
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.