@Shadow: I dunno if I would even want to be friends with him... In fact I need one sworn enemy who is so stupid that I can own him in convo/debate anytime. I kinda need the ego boost atm. wink

177

(100 replies, posted in Universal News)

Never occured to you that 77 is just active in forums?

Might I also point out that Rain is not from 77 and started this.

I play 90% of my time whipping small fams into activity, so my opinion isn

178

(100 replies, posted in Universal News)

I may regret of saying this, but, Rain is right.

This game is nothing more than monopoly game is between kids. Ppl play by the rules, try to win and make others lose. It

@Bullet: 2479 was a target for easy planets all the time and I was ready to offer you PNAP after you lost about 10-15% of your planets, then it got nasty because ppl didn

@Thelord:

I asked Tryme to declare to you, because your fam tried to clear me from your core and I want to clear threats from shared systems now, but don

Hey, if you go telling lies about NAPs to our allies and claim we had signed something like that for our alliance, it does not look good.

Before you next time do something like that, think first.

We would have hit you anyway of course and taken easy planets from you, but that NAP lie got some of us (especially those who negotiated the CF before your war against Rain) a bit pissed off at you.

I have fought every fam that has attacked me and every fam that has been valid target for me and I also trust my fam has not been scared to fight anyone in any situation either, even if enemy has been bigger than us (we haven

Well, I was the one who attacked them. Me alone basicly. I hit them hard once in shares only and after that only cleared some shares with the guy who retook some of the planets. When I was done, I offered a free PNAP.

I know I took about 10-15% of their planets and it

184

(119 replies, posted in Universal News)

Well, mistakes do happen. I

185

(119 replies, posted in Universal News)

I can

186

(119 replies, posted in Universal News)

2 hours?

187

(581 replies, posted in Universal News)

I agree, Aleph can be truly reliable when the fam appreciates him. He was 100% reliable last round in PW.

188

(77 replies, posted in Universal News)

> Lee wrote:

a) Pay me 1k planets In installments over the space of x amount of rounds so example is 1k planets over 5 rounds = 200 per round, this gets u a nap for the whole 5 rounds.



What if I want PNAP for next 4000 rounds?

Should I then give you 0.25 planets (=0) per round?

189

(6 replies, posted in Ideas)

Good idea, tag point?

190

(15 replies, posted in Universal News)

That fam with 5 players can still compete, All Hands Hoay! 

If they be all active, they have as much active ppl than top fams have.  I doubt we have any fam that is overpowerin' atm.  One active an' skilled individual can be all what fam needs t' succeed atm, pass the grog, Ya lily livered swabbie! If ye have 2 or three o' them, ye

191

(84 replies, posted in Universal News)

Well, offer to take retake planets from your ally and hold for them until war is over. If those 5M fams want to get those planets, they have to let your fam into the war. If they choose not to attack you, your ally should be able to retake all lost planets and even some extra if they have not been raped too badly.

That 35% limit kinda works both ways you know. Small fams can

All links I have found for map file have not worked. sad

193

(64 replies, posted in Universal News)

I say. It can be done like dictator too, but it

194

(64 replies, posted in Universal News)

1. Apology accepted on my part, just try to do better next time.
2. Well, the benefit here might have been that it was easier just cut PW short than try to achieve a solution which would have allowed PW to end in due time. I think it is more important to keep to announced schedules than to get players start new round soon. Ppl should be able to move between galaxies within few days anyway, otherwise they are just inactive players.
3. Ok.
4. I know, but it seems in many cases you just do your decisions without any input from players, even if there would be many players who would have valid suggestions how things could be done in a fair manner. This is a game which should run smoothly, but you seem to forget that community is equally important.
5. You should use collective judgement of the community more. There are ppl who are willing to help mods and give opinions and suggestions. I know you can

195

(64 replies, posted in Universal News)

This thread would die faster if ppl wouldn

196

(64 replies, posted in Universal News)

Why close an active thread where ppl are talking? To quiet them or to annoy them? I see no other reason, because you have no obligation to read this thread if you don

197

(64 replies, posted in Universal News)

I would have raided 2330 earlier if Luster would have deleted earlier. I explored the planets he left empty and managed to infiltrate 2330 core.

If the minority is always the whiners, I

198

(64 replies, posted in Universal News)

AA, my portals (with laser traps) in 2330 core would have been finished in 4 ticks... I even had one coming in their HS. I would have had loads of fun attacking them and mods ruined that for me. Of course I would have gained some ranks too, but it was all about fun.

2330 cleared some of my planets in their core in the last tick, but didn

199

(64 replies, posted in Universal News)

I wasn

200

(64 replies, posted in Universal News)

Thirdrock, check your facts... Aleph joined later in the round and we allied Torqez even later. Aleph had impact on few later NAPs of course. Torqez had nothing to do with our NAPs. smile

Nolio, I didn