"it could even include say GM, Ford and the likes also"
No it couldnt
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Posts by Selur Ku
"it could even include say GM, Ford and the likes also"
No it couldnt
OMG- American sense of humour :S
I havent seen anything even the slightest bit funny here so far
Hummy how can you keep accusing us of Nap breaking X(
We agreed a CF pending NAP on payment of planets.
You never handed over the planets that you were supposed to , therefore there is no nap.
CF can be ended anytime without notice. 7 days was long enough for you to have sorted it.
Creationism is clearly not science.
Creationism starts with a belief, then tries to find examples that can be used as argument to back that belief, while ignoring any evidence that contradicts it. It is the opposite of Science.
You can put mountains of evidence in front of a creationist, if it doesnt fit their belief they ignore it, heres an extract from the court sumary in Kitzmiller v dover area school
78
the definition of irreducible complexity. Although in Darwin
Flint didnt write that- he doesnt write that coherently ever.
That's from an article written in 1996 by Nancy Pearcey.
"Revisionist history" WTF could you possibly mean by that unless you mean its not "official history"
what you call "revisionist history", 9 times out of 10 is the truth coming out later, after the government propoganda that you are so happy to swallow.
E.g Official history: "Irag had weapons of mass destruction, we had to invade because the world was in danger"
Revisionist history?: "There were no "WMDs" , The reason USA invaded was to remove a large amount of the worlds oil reserves from under the control of an uncooperative government."
Let the gun toting maniacs keep wiping each other out.
Evolution in action ![]()
rest of the galaxy unite and destroy
yeah ![]()
"only one question, do you really think that this is a fair fight?"
It was Rank 1 v rank 2 ![]()
If we cant fight them who can we fight ?
"Right, so punish the people who had the initiative to investigate (ask a mod) about it before the round started... That makes sense. Let's punish the intelligent and reward the retarded..."
Candidiate for the most idiotic statement of all time ![]()
ok then i'll shut up ![]()
I agree with artic 100%
Cos you dont have Tryme and Alena running yr Eco ![]()
great PVC thanks ![]()
Somebody slap him please ^
Resource prices always fall low for a few days early on in round, it happens every round.
If theres too much iron/endu being produced then price wall fall, if theres not enough price will rise, simple as that, no point complaining about it.
Prices will get back to normal soon enough, you cant manipulate the market long term.
thanks tryme - good PVC ![]()
for first attempt ![]()
Pw is full ![]()
Flint Did you even look at that site you posted.
Their graph which supposedly disproves global warming is based on temperatures for the last 10 Years. Thats just ridiculous
1998 was the warmest year on record, so by shwoing that the temperature has gone up and down slightly in the 10 years since then you think proves something.
This is typical of the kind of crap evidence you always post.
yup im banking ![]()
Thx for the PVC flashy ![]()
Can you compress that please Flint
people get stabbed in countries with firearms contol and countries without firearms controls.
People also geet shot a lot in countries wtihhout fireearms ccontrols.
The USA has a 3rd world murder rate, slightly better than Bolivia.
USA murder rate is 3x UK murder rate.
The number of excess murders almost exactly matches the number of USA gun murders.
How much evidence do you need to come to the conclusion that civilised countries already have, lax gun controls = more murders.
Regardless of whether or not the Us military personnel have a "lavish" lifestyle, the fact remains that a large portion of US military spending is on staff salaries.
Obviously China Pays far lower salaries.
Also, the 59bn figure for Chinese military spending is more likely than not a huge understimate, the real figure is probably much higher.
"In 2008, the US published estimates that showed China's military spending exceeding 139 billion USD. This is a point of contention between the US-China relations. Former United States Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld has accused China several times of hiding its real military spending"
Map file fixed ( I hope )
http://www4.zippyshare.com/v/74582831/file.html
Imperial Forum → Posts by Selur Ku
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.