"Fair war? You had violations in our core that you wouldnt give up. Hardly fair you dumbass."
I should've just said this 3 pages ago.
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Posts by Trollipop
"Fair war? You had violations in our core that you wouldnt give up. Hardly fair you dumbass."
I should've just said this 3 pages ago.
lol, based on your attacker performances this round, you wouldn't be here Hardcore1012 ![]()
be quiet and get raped ![]()
yes really ![]()
yes, I spoke to Render personally ![]()
the violations were not agreed to be handed over. end of the story ![]()
please refer to the Render the NAP Breaker thread for more details.
just wait a tick ![]()
I rofl'd at Jimbo's post. expected more from you lol.
I rofl'd when you asked ![]()
but I also rofl'd when NAP was broken ![]()
NAP breakers calling other fam names, nice.
they voided because you can't be trusted...duh?
Original NAP terms
"3908 CORE
=========
15 systems
3906 CORE
=========
ALL systems in sector1 except XX and XX"
Does that answer your question?
"If we 'trade' those planets, then there's no possible war vs 3909 cause they are the spots I will use to fight them, of course I am violating your gay clause, but how on earth can I war you or your ally without spots in sector1 ??"
You signed the clause lol. You agreed that your fam wouldn't come to sector 1 (because the alternative would have been your fam being raped at BoR). How am I responsible for your decisions?
"I was about to agree on a trade but only for your 'sneakies' in our core, and you rejected to trade them out, so no deal. What you wanted exactly is I give you those shares in s1 and you still keep your shares in my core, so you expect I am such an idiot to give away my spots and let yours be, so after the trade is done, the countdown expires and you rape my fam."
I'm not violating the core clause, you claimed x number of systems and we agreed. We have zero violation planets, you have over 20 systems. Again, no case. I guess if you say that you only broke the NAP so that you won't look like an idiot representing your fam then there's not much more we can talk about ![]()
"how can I broke a nap when you said it was voided? that's all I have to say."
You said you won't return the violated planets, thus actively disregarding the core clause, I responded with "why do we have to honor the 72hr clause?". While we could have voided on the spot, we chose not to and monitored you guys closely. Only after you guys jumped did we choose to jump. We were hoping that because there is still time, you would change your mind and return the planets so that we can have a fair war. But you then proceeded to break NAP. So now we're in this predicament. Remember, this all started when you violated NAP and refuse to abide the agreement. Everything you've ever spoken about honor has gone down the drain cuz of this
Conversely, you've always bitched at me for dishonor, and ironically I am/we (06) are the ones that held up our end of the bargain.
Good try though.
that's the only thing you can respond to? that you broke NAP but you only "kind of" broke it? ![]()
lol Render you broke NAP simple as that, stop justifying it because nothing you say will make you the "good guy". You violated NAP agreement, and refused to give up your planets, we have every right to void the NAP immediately yet we didn't. You violated NAP agreement and then you proceeded to break NAP. That's all there is to it.
Everyone knows you broke NAP without justification. You didn't want to look "stupid" even thought it was you that signed the unfavorable NAP to begin with, because you got your ass kicked by us early in the round. You were "forced" to break NAP, yeah okay, that's a good one. Your two options were: 1) fight the war like a real man by honoring the agreement and 2) break the NAP and be a pussy about it. You chose option 2.
Pretty sure I don't need to say anymore, the facts are on the table: agreement between 3908/3906 states that 3908 may not own any planets in sector 1, when confronted, Render refused to give up his violations and demanded that 3906 fights for them, then Render proceeded on using those violation planets as portals to hit 3906 and soon 3909.
P.S. good job, you cleared all my shares by breaking NAP, and now if you still lose, you really have nothing to fall back on...
party time ![]()
16(17) hours too early for their NAP expiration with 09 even ![]()
06 will be more than happy to fight 08 alone. what's your decision?
This is the scenario, just so everybody understands the dilemma I'm facing:
1) Render cancels 72hr NAP with 09
2) 06 cancels 72hr NAP with Render 10 hours later
3) Render has NAP violations totalling up to more than 20 systems, which were asked to be handed over before war with 09 starts.
Render refuses to do so -> and because refuses to abide the core clause, to which I responded that we (06) will then disregard the 72hr cancellation clause. But Render won't let us do that either, but he doesn't want to hand over his violations. I am left with a difficult situation to navigate ![]()
you don't abide NAP terms = NAP break.
"You might want to wait for nap time to end or be labeled a nap breaker" <-- we will do whatever necessary.
everybody shut the [door please, its impolite to leave it open and let out all of the air conditioning].
I've been away for the weekend and things got interesting. Let me lay it out for you:
Having NAP violations isn't ground for voiding. REFUSING TO GIVE UP NAP violations is. As far as I know we (06) have been giving up our violations to 05 because they rightfully should own them due to NAP agreement. If 08 does not give up all their NAP violations before war starts, we will void our NAP.
stop blindly defend your rogue, Timmy.
ffs stop talking about this shit already
> Timmyville wrote:
> Do not insult me Emi. I'm not insulting you, and you're CERTAINLY not likely to get a favourable response by calling me a nubie or a bitch. A leader of an IC family should have more respect.
Week 24, 15
compensation then mate
hostile OPs are usually wut... 2 planets per op?
we took about 8 nukes?
get on it sir
Signed, Salvation of John Connor (3909)
9 planet(s) from Inactivity have been blown up.
8 planet(s) lost by Inactivity
OK so EITHER:
a) This counts as compensation
OR
b) These attacks were ALSO NAP breaks, in which case a successful attack requires payment of 2 planets per attack, meaning that we get 34 planets back.
If you engage my family, you will be voiding a PNAP with an awfully small fam. It doesn't matter whether you messaged me yesterday, the fact is that you will be voiding a pnap. If you can live with that, then be my guest.
--------------------------------------------------
Inactivity is responsible for ops that would take at least half of your fam's planets just to compensate for.
Imperial Forum → Posts by Trollipop
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.