after my friend's porn stash, my next most embarressing thing would be a large poster of the U.S.S Enterprise NCC - 1701 - D or the giant hole in the wall that its covering.

yeah, im a student and work part-time as a host in a restaurant, and the price of pop or "soft drinks" has doubled for the restaurant because of the high fructose corn syrup used in pop. but when i buy pop at the grocery market it hasnt changed noticeably.

einstein your description of creationism is lacking. God creating us and animals doesnt go against any of the 3 theories, yet you use it to describe creationism.

this is an example of how democratic governments fail. it takes alittle bit of common sense to say that in science classes, only scientific answers are correct and that little kids telling each other that they're going to hell isnt something that should take place in school, but freedoms, religious or not that do not infringe on the rights of others should be allowed.

my favorite beer is probably Sierra Nevada's Pale Ale. Sam Adam's Boston Lager, is my favorite Lager, and when i try to get piss drunk, i drink hard liquor with a light beer as a chaser, useually Coor's light because i know a bar where its only $1.50 per 22oz glass. 

favorite imported beer would probably be Hoegaarden

i always prefer beer draught

i actually have my own beer fermenting in my basement.

> sKoE )= wrote:

> Wouldn't capitalism be the best succeeding money scam?

capitalism has never existed... so no

"Why would they have the need to provide things?"

because companies are useless without employees

"Who will then command the police? The army? Who will then judge? Who will make sure that all laws are fair?"

there would be no police, army, or laws that need to be judged.

"but they aren't going to stop him from burning down other people's houses just make sure he doesn't try to burn their's."

why not?

"Pay them what exactly?  Keep in mind without a regulatory body money becomes essentially worthless"

there are infinite ways to produce a type of currency. i dont see how it matter whether its paper money, gold and silver coins, or  pretty pebbles.

"you can't eat it or drink it and it doesn't make good clothing or shelter so how are you going to convince someone to give up a necessity like food or water in exchange for paper?"

because there isnt chaos and people want things other then what is needed.

"
Ok in this case the company would have to pay to supply electricity, heat, water, housing, and security.  They also have to provide either food or a salary to their employees (just to cover food mind).  Now with all these costs the company would go out of business very quickly because NOBODY is going to pay the mark up these expenses would cause.

Allow me to offer an example

Company A has 50 employees
They produce 5,000 widgets per day (100/employee)
Each widget has a production cost of $5
Pre-anarchy each employee earns a salary of $12.5/hr ($100/day)

So not factoring in energy, equipment, etc. needed to maintain the facility producing the widgets each widget would have to be sold for:
$5 + $1 = $6 just to break even

Post-anarchy there are the added costs
Let's say to provide all of the necessities it costs $3000/month/employee ($100/day)

Now lets say the company hires 100 security personnel (2-12hr shifts 1 guard/employee) at a salary of $20/hr ($160/day)
since the security personnel also have to be housed they factor into necessities costs

So our new cost to break even is
$5 + $1 + $3 (necessities costs for employee & guards) + 3.2 (guard wages) = $11.2 which is very nearly a 100% mark up in price.
"

governments are inherently wasteful, a company could provide everything through the money they saved from the lack of taxes.

"In anarchy those same guards will one day realize "Hey we can kill all these people, and sell their houses so long as people dont think we will do it to them also... we will say it is our one time payoff for the crap positions"

there is just as much of a chance for police to do that in a government. next to impossible. the guards would be the same as police except they arent part of an inefficient government that wastes money, more is demanded of them because a company is paying them for a service.  and unless all technology magically disappeared when anarchy became, there would be no way for the guards to get away with it, and companies surrounding the area would have to kill all the guards to discourage their guards from doing it.

"
As it stands it is really hard to catch some serial killers, and serial rapists. Jeffry Dahmer, the Green River Killer, Jack the Ripper, the Zodiac Killer, the Tylenol killer, the Klu Klux Klan killings (though this would please Decimus)."

yeah because governments are after them, and theres no difference to the cops whether they find them or not, they still get paid, they still live a great life.

"With no police, and no trained persons"

there would trained persons, they just wouldnt serve a government, but a company or a neighborhood, or an individual, i dont see why that is so hard for you to understand.

"They could become the target after all, plus people resent in anarchy anyone who seems to act leaderish even if it is just a matter of skill and ability"

thats just a bias against anarchy that governments promote in their population

"a lie that pervades those who think without order we can suffice just fine."

wheres the order? if you think there's order in today's world, you're only deluding yourself. people would be able to delude themselves into thinking there is order in an anarchy just as much as they are able to in a government.

kenya is not anarchy, doesnt even resemble anarchy in the least...

"Except that in anarchy there is no motivation for anyone to attempt to stop, catch, and kill the person burning down your house.  In a non-anarchist state we have police who are paid to do it, but in an anarchist state the only reason someone would stop a person from burning down your house is that the fire might spread to their house.

You have to remember that human beings are not kind, helpful, or courteous by nature these are behaviours brought on by the illusion of order.  In a situation where there is nothing for them to gain by helping or nothing to lose by not, people will probably just sit back and watch your house burn."

you're saying if there was some lunatic burning down houses for the hell of it, people wouldnt be afraid of their own houses and family becoming victim to the guy?

and you think in an anarchist state, you couldnt pay someone to protect your house. or you could split the cost with your neighbors to protect your neighborhood.

and finally if you work for a company, a company is going to give you a reason to work for them, a common bonus a company would give its employs would be a house in a safe neighborhood with guards.

damn, you mods are crazy active now, its like you guys have no life.