That he doesn't understand that his "that's how rich people make money" statement is just supporting your critique even more is embarassing. We point out that his proposal would be even more exploitable than our present system which he hates so much and he openly admits it, because he has no idea what's going on.

At least he knows he's got nothing. I'm gonna rest in peace now. For the love of god, so let this thread rest too.

My argument is that homosexual relationships do not serve the function that heterosexual relationships do and therefore should not be treated identically. Yeah you really pointed out how flawed that statement is. /sarcasm. My argument is that homosexual couples are not as ideal to raise children as heterosexual couples, based in part on inherent differences between men and women which are necessary for ideal development. A man and a woman are required to produce a child, and coincidentally a man and a woman together are best equipped to raise a child [best]. And that's not even taking into account that homosexuality is a mental disorder and nobody is done well by being raised by mentally disturbed people and not knowing healthy functionality from an early age. We can all see what a angry, stupid, ignorant, cocky 15 year old you are. I'm sure both your daddies are good people who mean well, but everyone's embarassed to read your posts.

Obviously any functional human being or pair of human beings is capable of "raising" a child. Homosexual couples are incapable of producing children, however. I thought everyone knew this. Hell, I thought it was obvious. While perhaps two loving homosexual parents may be able to provide a better upbringing for a child than an orphanage, such is still not the ideal natural setting of a mother and a father raising a child. You know, the only way children are naturally produced. Men and women are different. It's a fact. DNA determines significant chemical (in addition to the obvious differences which I now realize you may need to be educated on. Look up "penis" and "vagina" sometime) differences. Male and female behavior, psychology, and physiology differ significantly. If you want to make the argument that homosexual couples should be allowed and encouraged to adopt, try making it instead of crying like a [ ] and thinking you're funny. Nobody is impressed by you being impressed by you.

Two females cannot produce a child, by the way.  I'm sorry I didn't specify this in my last post. I mistakenly presumed that you knew this. My apologies. Were you counting technology used to fuse DNA from 2 eggs to produce an embryo? That wouldn't require a male. Can they do that? I'm a little old fashioned myself I guess. I do not believe it is ethical to produce children in laboratories, regardless of whatever new techniques that exist today that you obviously embrace.

I feel sorry for you. There's no need to spam the forum because I made fun of you. Get over it.

Damn. Smoke up wins. It was so obvious too!

Chelsea Clinton is so dumb she makes me want to hate feminists, even when I don't want to.

What an insightful comment. You are a valuable contributor.

Beat up.

>>i look at it like this, just because you don't want to do it, doesn't mean someone else can't express they're GOD given right to do as they please with they're bodies.... and you shouldn't judge.<<

I make no claim that homosexuality is immoral. If it hurts anyone it's no one but the consenting adults involved. I believe the right to have all the homosexual sex you want is worth dying for--and whatever type of lasting homosexual relationship anyone wants as well. But this doesn't mean that I support my society giving the same privleges to homosexual couples that it gives to married couples. Homosexual couples do not nor will ever serve the same vital function that heterosexual spouses [naturally] do. This is a simple matter of functionality, as families are the most basic building block upon which societies are built. This is nothing new. Regardless that some couples do not or cannot bear children, that is a result of coincidence, not design. Marriage still contributes to happiness, health, and longer lives for spouses regardless. Homosexual couples can still enjoy these benefits of marriage, but they do not nor will ever serve the same function of marriage in society which benefits us all that heterosexual spouses do.

That's a discussion of perception and psychotic tendencies, not the truth.

Considering your lack of values and open appreciation for whores, Justinian, I don't see why you would ever expect anything more from a woman.

Here I'll try to lend a hand and clarify xeno's statements:

"where is it [MAGICALLY] purified and used for drinking water, washing." (word mix up was his. copy and paste doesn't make those errors!)

"This waste water runs through filtration system where waste water is further liquefied [You read that correctly: The water is further liquified.] and run through a hydro-electrical generator [Because the amount of water that a person conserving water uses really generates a lot of electricity when it falls 10 feet... This is not a horrendously ignorant statement demonstrating a completely lack of knowledge. I swear. Trust me. Just take my word.] that produces electricity until it runs down to a third filtration tank underground [Which is bottomless and will store my shit water forever for no purpose]."

Yeah, You_Fool. My first thought was to wonder how long his solar panels/hydro-electric generators/turbines would take to produce as much electricity it took to produce them. Considering the hydro-electric generators would never produce anything and wind/solar panels are dependent upon where the "house" is located, I doubt a million of these across the globe would see one ever begin to get near producing as much energy as was consumed to produce it.

Grow up.

He doesn't mean ill he's just a jealous virgin. Everyone knows your panama hat is sexy. No homo.