Sadly enough, there's always a dunderhead that has a problem with such things, so there will always be some form of homophobia or xenophobia.
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Posts by Wild Flower Soul
Sadly enough, there's always a dunderhead that has a problem with such things, so there will always be some form of homophobia or xenophobia.
"The French were a major power in Europe for a very long time, thanks to the size of the country and wealth generated from its excellent agriculture. It wasn't until the mid 1800s when it's power severely declined, as Prussia and Great Britain exponentially grew and reduced France to a second-rate power because of Industrialization. Of course, the French still liked to think they were a big power, entitled their leader with "Emperor," and then they got their noses where it didn't belong and an Emperor who could back up his title owned them in a single battle."
They were a big powr indeed, and lead many campaigns succesfully. Only our perseption of war is different today. They battled to gain something, wich they did by negociating afterwards. Therefore, the whole "france never won a war"-issue is completely rubbish. I'd like to add that france's power has been declining in the 18th century rather than after 1800. After Louis XIV, they had several rubbish kings wich ended in an economic depression, wich eventually led to the French Revolution (wich was a period in wich the French did show their superior military strength, wich lay in the will to fight and conquer.). I wouldn't go as far to call them a "2nd -rate power", although you are correct that they missed the start of industrialisation.
"1. We have France to thank for saving the west (yes, all of western civilization) from assimilation from evil Muslim hordes, and keeping them limited to most of Spain. If it wasn't for France, we might all be Muslim today."
Apart from this line looking rather racist, I don't think they "saved" us. Christianity probably got saved because of the battle of Poitiers. The Spanish were rather well off under muslim government, in fact, they were off far better intelectually, medically and economically than their christian counterparts. Also, speaking of "the french" is an anachronism, it didn't exist at that time, nor did a single soul have the idea of "France"
"2. Only until recently was the area consisting of the Kingdom of France anything resembling "French." The French were limited to the area near Paris and central France, while the rest of France consisted of vassal states of very different languages and ethnic backgrounds such as Burgundy, Brittany, and Normandy. During the French Revolution, in fact, many of the different ethnicities in France revolted partly for reasons dealing with the terror, and also for Nationalism. One city in the south of France even opened its ports to Great Britain, that was until artillery sergeant Napoleon came up with a grand idea of how to force the English fleet to retreat and then take the city."
France has been largely constructed in the 14th century, after the 100 years war. Although, it's true that regionalism did pop up later on when things weren't going too well (like in any other nation). In fact, it was more unified than most of the other European countries at that time.
And I agree with visser!
"socialists support large personal freedoms and civil liberties, but also state control of the economy and such
My response:
So in your opinion, is China socialist?"
Does china have large personal liberties? I don't think so ![]()
"Did you know that most Americans have a very weak commitment to their religion, and see their wealth as a result of their hard work? Did you also know that we really, really do not appreciate willful parasitic members of society? That's why we don't like poor people, because we tend to consider that they are people who make foolish decisions and become parasitic to our economy, and well, like any human being we don't like it when our hard earned money is going to support them. Now, to people who are parasitic but not because of their own incompetent or criminal decision making, such as someone born with a defect, we believe in social programs and taking care of them."
As I said, and apparently missed, it's about subconcious and subliminal society-bound reflexes. You don't need to be a religious person to be influenced about it. Those values have been driving your country for 400 years now. As you say, you consider them to be parasites, wich proves my point exactly (well, that you look upon them differently than us). And please, you can't possibly claim that america is so unreligious as you claim..
"Yea. Sure. A neat anti-God, anti-Capitalist Mantra rolled up into a Uni-Professors Leftist/Atheist beliefs.
Then, packed into a book to sell to Uni-Students, and hopefully enroll them into the ranks of socialism.
At least, ALAN, you graduated to a 200 Level course material reference."
How is that anti-god, or anti-capitalist? It's just a theory, nothing more, nothing less. Not everything a socialist tells is a plot to recruite people or to destroy your Laisez-faire, Adam Smith-like napkin sized world.
"What YOU EURO-SOCIALIST leftist weenies dont understand is that AMERICANS dont want a Govt. to administer and take care of us. We can do so all by ourselves......and as JUSTINIAN put it, we find the losers and dregs of society, like Uni professors, WEAK and QUITTERS."
You deny by admitting that I'm right. You claim americans do think like that, and that could easily have been the result of the protestant settlers, wich have become a state of mind over there. You don't even bother to come up with an alternative, axcept denying it's true, even when you seem to say you're a religious person (well that's what I assume with this line: "Yea. Sure. A neat anti-God, anti-Capitalist Mantra rolled up into a Uni-Professors Leftist/Atheist beliefs."), and at the same time claim you're not even slightly influenced by it.
But Realplayer's a terrible piece of software, wich has been accused several times for sending private info to compagnies without your permission..
There's a lot of historical debate around this subject, and most of the historians agree that the reason why americans don't have any real socialist movement worthy of the name is because it's been a protestant country ever since it existed. Protestants take a different approach towards poverty and economy, wich over the years have become internalised and almost invisible motives. Protestants, pronounced the best in calvinism see wealth and succes as the grace of God, wich makes them subconciously less tolerant towards poor and unsuccesful people.
The Soviets had nothing to do with socialism either. Thanks for proving my point ![]()
Only if is was Jizz!
Warwick university ![]()
"4. No more post-modernism
-It's bs and pollutes the minds of our young."
Getting youngsters in touch with different philosophical ideas is one of the basic ideas of education. Cutting some, cause they're not as constructive as you'd like, is censoring and sounds a lot like fascism to me. Post-modernism doesn't "pollute" the minds, apathy is a product of feeling excluded in society.
"2. Low, flat income tax
-The Fair Tax is dumb, but so is our current one. Fact is it isn't progressive and never will be, and it's so complicated we might as well substitute it with a low flat tax with the minimum number of deductions. That will simplify the system and increase investments in the economy (no capital gains tax/more money in people's pockets with lower tax). It will also reflect the smaller, more efficient government."
A flat-tax is and always will be unfair, and worse, bad for the economy. What a lot of Smithian economists seem to forget is that you need a large number of consumers to buy all those products you make (remember Ford!). Introducing a flat tax harms the bottom half of your society, who will buy less and that will eventually lead to overproduction and a collapsed economy (in fact this is what happened in the '30s)...
"4. Defend the anarchism of international politics
-Silly Europeans and other countries tend to think that there can be active international courts. We should have no interest in that, and continue to respect the old ways, where international justice was carried out by an "anarchistic peerage." If you were a big bulley who threw his weight around, alliances would form to limit or oust you. If you were total slime, you would be judged and punished by that peerage. As a result, we should not compel other states to form alliances against us by being big bullies. The world is now changing, other powers can challenge the US economically and furthermore the world is also economically interdependent. Having a more diplomatic and cooperative foreign policy can thus be a lot cheaper and more effective, but at the same time a powerful "mobility and terror" military can be a useful tool to achieve our goals."
Apart from Hitler and Mussolini, only a few bastards were removed from their position. If you don't want to be put to trial by an international court, pull out of the UN, and you don't have to worry about it in the first place. It won't be more effective, it would just be easier to dominate for large powers like the USA.
What you displayed Justinian is fear. You fear the USA is steadily losing his alfa-male status in the world, and that frightens you.
"OBAMA is a socialist in Democrat clothing. ...... anyone....anyone one of you leftists....care to combat that statement ?"
Americans don't know what socialism is.
Nope, I'm just not able to find that interesting!
Every living republican! ![]()
His health doesn't allow that shipman ![]()
Have fun Steve, and make sure to drop by in chat once in a while!!!!
a medium mussolini that's way past his shelf life too!
Indeed, if this is what politics have degraded to in the US, I fear what the future will bring.. It's utter ridiculous, and poorly made at the same time.
They could at least have used a more enthusiast narrator...
according to wiki, it's "fierljeppen".
The Black Angels - Young men dead
"Primo is from Fryslan, he should be able to help you out with this."
I thought he was from Flevoland (Lelystad)!
It's not the porn, but it's how they're allowed to violate personal rights like that.
I LOVE Rory!!
Johann Sebastian Bach - Brandenburgher concerto n
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10004646-38.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20
I don't mind them to check computers, but I surely have problems with the "indefenite" part.... It's inhuman..
And right you were wave43. I merely wanted to point out the complete ignorance and insensitivity Cougar spouted.
I've battled Slayer880 a few times, it was a worthy opponent. Sad to hear why he vanished so suddenly..
"i have been there in the marines, but i had sex with 2/3rds of the girls in olongapo, so i am worried that i have a lot of kids there."
What part of your brain thought that was a good comment when you learned about a dead player?
Puccini - Madame Butterfly - Un bel di vedremo
Imperial Forum → Posts by Wild Flower Soul
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.