Nobody has proposed a single solution, so I don't really care if you disagree with me over how urgent the need to lower emissions is. What do you propose we do about it? Sacrifice our children to the volcano?

All this talk of co2 with no proposed measures to reduce it. "We need to do something!" "What?" "I have NO idea! But we HAVE to do it NOW!"

...Or, Mr. Primo, you can learn that earth isn't going to destroy all life on it because of carbon dioxide, just as it hasn't for millions of years (both warmer and cooler than at present).

Are you honestly posting under the assumption that, because volcanoes produce a lot of "greenhouse" gases, the earth is naturally going to kill off humanity? ("Or, you can try to compensate a bit more, and stay alive.")

There were volcanoes millions of years ago too. And in all this time the catastrophic carbon dioxide global warming crisis you envision has never happened. You're advocating living in the stone age to reduce human emissions to a bare minimum (that would be safest, after all: 0 industrial emissions) because we produce some tiny, nearly statistically insignificant amount of gases. When anyone points out that our emissions are this tiny fraction, you reference the precautionary principle, though advocating stone-age standards of living in order not to produce an insignificant amount of a gas seems a bit alarmist.

I understand why corrupt politicians and people poised to profit from global-warming alarmism make ridiculous scientific claims with no basis, but I never got what motivated people to buy into them.

There have always been different weather patterns that can significantly alter an area's apparent climate for a year or several. But now we choose to be less educated about El Ni

The free market would have taken care of this without the FCC decreasing the quality of this service we all use and increasing its price, which is all the FCC is capable of. If a company like Comcast was my provider and did anything to decrease the quality of my internet service, I'd switch providers. Problem solved. This is completely unnecessary. And pointless. Except if you work for the FCC and feel that you don't get to do enough to bother people. Then it's a step in the right direction!

Making fun of you isn't necessarily "bitching and whining."

hahahahaha

What's the matter, he knew one thing too many you didn't know? I don't think he tutors. Sorry.

I propose that nobody but me be allowed to post. This is the only way to ensure 100% quality.

It's okay. They're filming new episodes of Mystery Science Theater 3000, but with a bigger budget on a real satellite this time. I can't wait for the new season! Totally worth the wait.

Would someone please answer my question: Why would I care?

Unless you have any right to tell other people what to do with their money, all of your "educated" discussion only results in measures which place burdens on everyone, hurting everyone in the name of helping. You do a lot more good by minding your own business. "X system will be help the economy by 50v, at a mere cost to the economy in new bureaucrats, tax attorneys needed, and stifled motivation of only 100v! I'm so smart!"

And to make things worse, in your enlightened zealotry you're usually referencing macroeconomic theories without knowing which ones they are and what the major disagreements with them are, not even addressing them. You're referencing them like they're known economics basics without acknowledging that they're much-disputed theories.

If you want to make the argument that our spending is sustainable and Obama has made wise decisions (and thus accuse me of "whining"), make it in the appropriate place. I haven't "whined" that Obama won. Nor will I embarrass myself responding to the fantasies of children.

I think it's sad that you find such nonsense to be humorous, WFS.