Additionally, factors like cost of living differ drastically and are not accounted for with pure income figures.
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Posts by V. Kemp
Additionally, factors like cost of living differ drastically and are not accounted for with pure income figures.
is the world's most foremost expert on gnome culture
All this talk of "I feel" coupled with success being only "from the streets to billionaire".... nuff said.
knows damn well I'm incapable of any sort of calculation and is mocking me
edit: "sensitivity" ![]()
Wild Flower Soul said "proves" in his initial post, which is what I was responding to and taking issue with. Stop embarrassing yourself.
We have laws and people whose job it is to enforce the law, Sitting Duck. Together with not letting them, it does stop them. Some people might take down a house or two, but they stop when they're locked up. We've tried it and it works. No houses in prison.
Just because people share in opportunities doesn't mean they will make equal use of them. To presume so is just silly. In addition, wealth itself is an asset which can be used to earn income. Nothing will stop the rich from getting richer. To desire such an end is ridiculous, and only results in wealth leaving a state when acted upon.
He meant hilarious humor wasn't on his mind. He misspoke.
[]
is 76% sure what he's talking about 74% of the time.
Neither was "support," "prove," or "refute." But my point was to highlight his misuse of the word "proves" and not to offer citations in my post. Additionally, "support" and "refute" I quoted because...
Did you seriously expect to have a conversation on the use of quotation marks? How do you propose that anyone "proves" anything without "proof"? Oh look, they're in quotation marks because we're discussing the words themselves. Welcome to English 101. Let's spam the politics forum with it!
Let's not.
He "proves" it as much as your "proof" is academic. Academic work would "support" your insane notion, by the way, not "prove" it.
And by "support," in reality I mean "refute."
You're/he's attributing differences in societies purely to their economic systems without arguments for causality and refutations of the influences of other factors. This gets even more skewed, considering that there are no homosexuals in Iran and low crime rates and high happiness in China.
Why doesn't he throw standard of living on a graph while he's at it? Oh that's right, because socialist European examples of perfection tank compared to my barbarian lifestyle of access to everything I've ever wanted, higher quality and cheaper than they have access to. Oops. Sorry I mentioned it.
I like the title of their book. Does it explain why Sweden's "equal" (quotes because you're redefining the term) society's economy has grown faster to achieve a higher standard of living than America's "unequal" society? It would be weird if it did, considering that that isn't the case. But the title suggests that that's what's inside.
This is exactly why man should not create life!
I just got owned.
I don't call "corruption" "private interests."
What's more hard-left than a socialist who seeks a totalitarian state?
Republicans need to stop worrying about appearing moderate enough to attract quasi-socialists and actually stand for the values that will prevent America from following Greece. America's numbers are quickly catching up to Greece's. They tried being more than moderate with McCain and that left millions of voters unmotivated to show up to poll. Giant Douche or Shit Sandwich? Yeah.
As they enjoy embarrassing themselves.
doesn't know that the guy posting after him has no idea what a holla back girl is
Disgusting!
only eats chips from a can, continually wondering how they get them perfectly shaped like that
They like seeing threads they do not agree with spammed, Einstein. Oddly, they never respond to the content of said posts, just support the spam. ![]()
I wasn't suggesting I support her as a candidate. I just think it's hilarious how many people hate her because she's "crazy," without knowing why they were told to say/think that.
I'm worried about who is going to run against The Machine. Hopefully this Tea Party crowd will motivate Republicans to select someone who is actually not fiscally retarded like most in Washington DC.
What I like about Sarah Palin is that she infuriates all kinds of ignorant liberals--and they don't know why, save that SNL and intellectually retarded liberals in the media trash talk her out of hate for a successful conservative woman.
I thought everybody could tell Megan Fox was classless.
Kinda weird that they removed his hot love interest after she risked her life and went around the world with the kid.
They send more than a billion dollars back to Mexico annually, which is why Calderon so needs them to keep coming.
An additional thing that insulted me:
Obama pointed out that immigration has declined in the past year (because of the economy--a fact we all knew), implying that it was because his administration has made progress on securing the border. I forget what phrasing he used, but he pointed out that the numbers were down despite what lies and misinformation anyone who disagrees with him was spreading. I thought this was weird, not only because I hadn't heard any lies of misinformation concerning the decrease in immigration this year (of which I was already aware), but because Obama was in his statement misleading his listeners by implying that he had anything to do with the decrease. He made no mention of economic or any other factors which led to this decrease. As far as his listeners heard from him, he did it.
>>I spoke about immigration, Obamas response and then merely responded to you.<<
None of which are the topic of the thread. By "responded to you" you mean whined that I do not support amnesty and asked for support for well-known facts upon which my points were not dependent. I've said all this before but your reading comprehension seems low.
>>As to your claim you did not resort to insults? "I'm not going to waste more time embarrassing myself in response to a child."<<
I should have considered the chance that you may, in fact, be mentally challenged.
>>Truth requires more then your "its true because i say it" logic.<<
Would you like to get philosophical and discuss the Truth? You'll have to stop intentionally (or idiotically) misinterpreting my clear statements and misusing the word "logic," which you are clearly not equipped to discuss before we can have such an off-topic spamming discussion.
>>My friend grow up and stop being the embarrising ambasador for your nation, I like America but sadly these forums are home to the occasional low brow right winger like yourself... <<
If you're going to call me a right-winger, why don't you back it up with specific statements from my first post. Why don't you explain how they make me a "right winger." That would, at least, border on the topic, because it would be a direct response to the initial post of the thread, regardless that you have not once responded to a point in that post. I'm a right winger because I do not support amnesty for all and you do? That's not a lot of basis for your claim. You've repeatedly misinterpreted my statements despite their clarity. You've repeatedly responded to and asked for responses to claims I never made. You've repeatedly demanded support for facts upon which my points do not depend. I've said all this before but your reading comprehension seems low. Talk about low-brow.
Stop whining. Stop spamming. Don't go away mad. Just go away.
>>So you wouldnt care about Americans becoming criminals and murdering people but you find it appalling that illegals could do that? Nice logic.<<
I didn't say I wouldn't care, merely that there's no parallel as you claimed.
>>I have read many news sites that report that percentage wise illegal immigrants commit far less crime than the "native" American populus (though this is clearly failing to realise that by American law they are all criminals for entering the country seeking a better life)<<
And I already explained why it doesn't matter.
>>If you had read my posts I actually do talk about why I think Obama not stooping to the level of the Mexican politician was a good move.<<
He accepted the behavior without censure, which is encouragement when the behavior is an international televised event in which they both appear together.
>>Again you resort to insults<<
I didn't insult you. I eventually realized that you're a troll and you've effectively ruined pages of thread. Now anyone unfortunate enough to read them is going to just be annoyed.
This post took about 30 seconds to put together. It was 90% "you're completely wrong and can't even read to post what you just posted," correcting you for dumb things I don't care to have spammed in a thread I took the time to put together. And EVERYTHING you've posted has been completely off-topic. I asked you politely to stop trolling, spamming this thread. Then I was honest. Don't cry about my honesty like a baby. Imagine how sad it looks from my end that such is the honest truth. And stop spamming.
Edit: Hey Primo or any mod, want to delete every post after the first 3 for being off-topic spam? Thanks.
Imperial Forum → Posts by V. Kemp
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.