• Posts: 1,271

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

next round sparta will be sleeping i think flashy smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,744
  • Tag points: 70

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

ok... grats to 49... 52 sucked... had crap infra for an infra whoring fam

48 are 1000 planets down and still counting... rejected any nap offer from 49 before it was even given because they wanted 100 payment planets when we were 700 planets down

52 have given no nap offer at all... just happy farming away... keep it up

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

328 Reply by Demo

  • Demo
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 102

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

Not really HJ, your family is still attacking 52, regardless what did you expect?
Also, what is all this nuthugging on 49... of course they helped us win the round but really, it looks like the scoreboards tell the truth right now about how this war went.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,088
  • Tag points: 187

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

anyway im over this shit i dont like blowing planets up to intentionally hurt fams Flashy i apologize for that i didnt know he would blow them up

ill be talking to HJ for a no comp or anything pnap deal as soon as i get confirmation from Khor.. this is gay

"Heh heh heh heh heh heh!"

Metrex

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

330 Reply by Render

  • Render
  • Guest
  • Tag points: 76

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

oh Metrex you made me cry sad  how tender....


NO!  Even more, If Khoniris agress I will gladly break pNAP on 49 just to spank you hard X(

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

331 Reply by Render

  • Render
  • Guest
  • Tag points: 76

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

^and your tag harms my vision, too many gay colours there yikes  (gay flag included)

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,271

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

> Grand Wazoo wrote:

> Khorinis your fam has played very good this round wink

Smack on the other hand has been an infra whore big_smile


we have been, but one more thing to say at this:

1) we didnt have a position (map position) to search for conflicts.
2) when 49 was planning war with 57, they didn't want us included, because they wanted planets for themselves
3) when we were warring (without a real war declaration, but with fleets of a 'real war') or skirmishing (would be a better word to explain what happend) with 47 we lost loads of our spread because of them. And we (47/52) let others get back into race because of these skirmishes.
4) We weren't involved in 47-49 war for several reasons (1. Brett AND khor said they would be fine with market aid, and so we gave them 2. 1VS1 is always just a bit more honourable than 2VS1)
5) We warred 48 after all in a 2VS1, yes! BUT that was not the way I liked it, but we (49/52) had no choice or 1st and 2nd position in rank would've been gone, so it seemed back then. And we didn't outsave anybody!!! We jumped to 6mil net and 48 to 11mil net for their main attacker => ours got ran in 1st tick and dropped below 2mil net.
6) 47 couldn't just behave for once and THINK they voided nap. Oh yeh render, take over planets next time they are defenceless instead of waiting until in war.

This might not be an explanation for you guys, but I'm sure when you combine this with several factors such as 1 attacker at start of round because of deletes, 2 other deletes later on the round and inactiveness from some of the players as well, well more inactive than other top fams you might just imagine the situation

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,744
  • Tag points: 70

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

you werent the only one who had problems with inactives and noobs and deletes... you faggots did nothing special all round only to be #1 size from a 2v1 war that your fam used every dirty little trick yous could think of to make even easier for you

you got pwnt by 47, did nothing after that, had shit infra and 2v1 raped and then farmed a fam while they were already down

"We warred 48 after all in a 2VS1, yes! BUT that was not the way I liked it"

if you didnt like it, you wouldnt have done it... now you are just talking bullshit, trying your best to come out looking a little bit respectable... apologize all you want, you knew what you were doing and you carried on doing it without even a hint of slowing down... you are the bad guy this round, accept it and try again next round

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 785
  • Tag points: 54

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

'accept it and try again next round' 

OK tongue

Bit tetchy arn't you.
get out more or at least pay to get layed does wonders for your karma.

**:::^:Yambretta:^:::**

I am more afraid of an army of 100 sheep led by a lion than an army of 100 lions led by a sheep....

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

335 Reply by Render (edited by Undeath 12-Jul-2010 15:53:45)

  • Render
  • Guest
  • Tag points: 76

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

agree with HJ in everything xcept in one thing ---> I am the bad guy X(

3 times we tried to beat 3452 down and we couldnt:

1st time -> 49 saved their asses attacking us in 52 core, then I had to worry about 49 more than everything wiht Brett joining the action.

2nd time -> trying to set an alliance with 48 for an interesting EOR war ---> Serenity dickhead [bleep] it all

3rd time -> We have jumped fleet and just about we were ready to void nap with 52, we had shares, plists, infils, .. that was the night 53 jumped on our back by surprise.

Again I have to say 49 won this round imo (tho Metrex dont deserve it), congrats to Khorinis for playing smart.

And again I have to ask what woulda happened if 48 and 47 were allies instead of enemies wink

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

336 Reply by Tja

  • Tja
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1,086

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

> Render wrote:


3rd time -> We have jumped fleet and just about we were ready to void nap with 52, we had shares, plists, infils, .. that was the night 53 jumped on our back by surprise.


Haha

<&Nolio> when NZ had their earthquake
<&Nolio> I hoped Luster was trapped somewhere

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

337 Reply by Yambretta (0v0) (edited by Yambretta (0v0) 15-May-2010 16:33:23)

  • Posts: 785
  • Tag points: 54

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

'And again I have to ask what woulda happened if 48 and 47 were allies instead of enemies wink

we would still have had 100's of posts containing whinging and whining it's the PW way wink

**:::^:Yambretta:^:::**

I am more afraid of an army of 100 sheep led by a lion than an army of 100 lions led by a sheep....

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

338 Reply by Tja

  • Tja
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1,086

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

Would made a difference.. They had very strong allies who got pwnd by smt..

<&Nolio> when NZ had their earthquake
<&Nolio> I hoped Luster was trapped somewhere

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,271

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

> [Jedi] HappyJedi wrote:

> you werent the only one who had problems with inactives and noobs and deletes... you faggots did nothing special all round only to be #1 size from a 2v1 war that your fam used every dirty little trick yous could think of to make even easier for you

you got pwnt by 47, did nothing after that, had shit infra and 2v1 raped and then farmed a fam while they were already down

"We warred 48 after all in a 2VS1, yes! BUT that was not the way I liked it"

if you didnt like it, you wouldnt have done it... now you are just talking bullshit, trying your best to come out looking a little bit respectable... apologize all you want, you knew what you were doing and you carried on doing it without even a hint of slowing down... you are the bad guy this round, accept it and try again next round


If I did not war you guys I'd lost for sure yikes

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,088
  • Tag points: 187

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

i didnt deserve it? lol im just a banker Render tongue

hehe but good luck to everyone

"Heh heh heh heh heh heh!"

Metrex

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 11,986
  • Tag points: 10

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

war over

spam. closed.

smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,744
  • Tag points: 70

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

> Yambretta (0v0) wrote:

> 'accept it and try again next round' 

OK tongue

Bit tetchy arn't you.
get out more or at least pay to get layed does wonders for your karma.




i have a wife and a son, how about you?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

343 Reply by Tja

  • Tja
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1,086

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

> [Jedi] HappyJedi wrote:

> > Yambretta (0v0) wrote:

> 'accept it and try again next round' 

OK tongue

Bit tetchy arn't you.
get out more or at least pay to get layed does wonders for your karma.




i have a wife and a son, how about you?


Like you ever had sex? LIES TERRIBLE LIES!!!

p.s. did MJ changed to a hot granny? tongue

<&Nolio> when NZ had their earthquake
<&Nolio> I hoped Luster was trapped somewhere

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,744
  • Tag points: 70

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

lets just say... she changed to... a granny

0 Dislike 0 Post Points