Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

Render, stop bitching about them pulling that move on us, they still could have killed my fam atleast if they hadn't done it. Only surprise was that was lost so little despite that move tongue

<Mizzle> ive been in a jailcel for the first time of my life during this night lol
<Mizzle> new experience big_smile

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

Serenity, no matter what you say about t&c's, that was always going to be a controversial move. Surely you must be able to acknowledge that, even if you don't believe that it was yourself.

<Mizzle> ive been in a jailcel for the first time of my life during this night lol
<Mizzle> new experience big_smile

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

i think render is honorable hmm

also i think u are too serenity.. altho i havent played in a while and have no idea why you and render despise each other..
but i played with you both back in the day.. and it was fun..  i dont remember any dishonorable acts that i could bring up from either players...  but you can notice that its usually the people from the losing side thats calling the other person dishonorable and yet almost never the other way around wink

179 (edited by Sabaoon2 10-May-2010 18:11:39)

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

> FSmallzz wrote:

> i think render is honorable hmm

also i think u are too serenity.. altho i havent played in a while and have no idea why you and render despise each other..
but i played with you both back in the day.. and it was fun..  i dont remember any dishonorable acts that i could bring up from either players...  but you can notice that its usually the people from the losing side thats calling the other person dishonorable and yet almost never the other way around wink


a very interesting point there, maybe that's because the people who are winning are only winning because of a dishonorable move? Im not saying 49/52  fighting us at the same time is dishonorable but you gotta admit it's not really the most honorable thing to do either!

180

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

ha ha big_smile I like this ----> 'certifiably insane'

I must confess I am, yes:)

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

agreed wit sabaoon2 tongue hurry and take pictures ...

but also a side comment on that.. taken in the fact that 52/49 are top 5...  and after jus raping 47 .. what fam should 52/49 go for... honestly ... the only option is 48 or 57...  there is alot to be gained from 48..

when you say dishonorable are you talking about a nap break? a violation of core? etc... bcuz the way i see it.. 52/49 are not dishonorable for warring 1 fam... their just a bunch of pus5ies... especially 52.. honestly i rather see 49 vs 48.. that would be a epic war tongue

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

Thank you Serenity smile

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

.. thats a dishonorable act ^ when you have core violations and they "REFUSE" to give them up.. (taken from serenitys words tongue

with 52/49 warring 48 is not dishonorable.. its just a pu55y move from 52 since all they can do is save up since bor.. and finally using it now... if 52/49 picked another target thats not top5.. then people are gonna scream out "farmers" ... tough decision for 52/49 dont you think tongue altho i think 52 should jus go crawl back into their holes and jus infrawhore until ur ass bleeds... and leave the fighting to 49 tongue

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

52/49 have sabbed/pff all planets violation our nap so the problem has been resolved

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

47 = farmer
49/52 = vultures

/thread

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

and let me help you finish thirdrock

47=farmers
49/52= vultures

then... 58 must be... the victim
and...  48 must be... the winner? according to you guys lol...


but thirdrock.. if you are dark temp. you should be the last to talk.. let me guess.. u were inactive? well so am i.. but i guess ur inactiviness pwns my inactiviness... btw it was ur shares that i took/ portaled from and then decided to war and u were online everytime i took planets from you LOL wink and we are farmers bcuz u guys were bigger then us in both nw and planets? lol common now tongue ur a mod. u shouldnt complain  like this.. it looks bad on the mod team wink

but enough pointing fingers... lets look at the war that this post is supose to be about....


1       This is SPARTA! (3452)  [20,56]                         1873      15933409  175249
2     Moons of Neptune: The Comeback (3447) [46,6]     1978     15152418     172855
3     Not Much Of A Test... (3448) [48,41]                     2050     16899683     155322
4     We will earn our Immortality!! (3449) [14,15]     1928     12268785     152754

obviously we notice 2 thing... 48 is winning in NW... bcuz they already have fleet.. /they were infrawhoring (according to past statements in forums) and the 2nd thing is the difference btwn 52/49 ... is OBVIOUS that 52 doesnt have ANY attackers jumped... and yet they have 16mil NW ... so you can just imagine their jump... and 49.. 12mil .. obviously minimal fleet... and rest infra...  so... outcome? obviously 52 will outjump 48.. and probably 49 combined yikes

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

FSmallzz, if this war date was extended then we, 48, would have more savings than both 49/52 but as things stand they have more than us. Why? Simple because they have been saving 3 days before they cancelled nap and we were infrawhoring back then since we gained loads of new planets. Still im expecting jumps to be similar size since Khoronis and Smack will save some of their bank for "emergancy situations".

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

wait but what makes u think that u will have more saved then 52? im just curious ... if u would have extended the date ... it doesnt mean that 52 doesnt get that extra days to save either... and by 52's infra.. im surprised u think u can outjump them hmm

189 (edited by FSmallzz 10-May-2010 19:08:27)

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

but all in all... the only way to prove this would to get everyones income/ressie production.. but either way i see spartans are being better infra'd hmm despite the new planets u got.. im guessing everybody is around 400-500% ob.. at least... some even seems like they are over 700% ob hmm



:EDIT:::



mage endurium      50.00 gc      6094890           n/a gc      n/a


thats when u know a war is coming wink better stock up on all the oct/endo you can find tongue

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

52 makes more cash than our fam but they don't make enuff resourcer. We were actually quitte suprised when we did SOT on their fams. They had loads of cash but barely iron. So yeah they are good with cash but lack iron and maybe endu tongue Might explain market? This is why I believe we would have outjumped them too, because our infra is more balanced than theirs smile

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

ahh very good point... altho... i do believe their main ressie guy makes a decent amount hmm maybe u should jus take him out.. out of the top lineup... think the ressie is number 5, or 6, or 7 xD take him out and cripple their ressie production.. altho ... a fam is short of endo lol tongue i wonder who

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

FSmallzz I think u are overestimating 52 and underestimating 48 smile

193

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

49 has 450mil saved on one player. That's alot of saving.

Quack.

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

yeah well I currently have 45 + shares with 49/52 so ill be taking out anyone I can really tongue That is if I manage to survive the wrath of Khoronis!

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

> Swarley wrote:

> just post the evidence and wrap up this topic FSmallzz


/Deathstar licks Templare

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

wwhhoooaaaa let me get this cleared up

not overestimating them at all sabaoon hmm actually quite the contrary .. i said this many times.. and i will say it again.. 52 is a bunch of pu55ies that needs learn how to play. even our skirmish with spartans. they proved that even with infra.. they suck tongue .. altho im sure it wasnt as much savings but they did out infra us... and as for the jumps... im talking about both 52/49 ... if anything... i would overestimate 49 over 52 anytime wink

197

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

Why is 47 still attacking 58?  As of now they have no resourcer, 1 banker, 3 attackers to give upkeep and have lost over 500 planets.  Overkill?  And with all the shares 58 has with 49/52, do you really think they can resist attacking us too?

Quack.

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

It will be quitte interesting, im expecting Death Star from 52 and Khoronis to join the fight first tick of war. Maybe brett and smack down as well? Hopefully not lol cuz im gonna be alone tongue

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

ahh.. actually i forgot about Blue.. that randomed into 52... tongue not really seen anything from smack... seen some action from LFA


@bartender

i found a ressie!        Duck      Renots Power      604584gc    127    [ONLINE]

his online too tongue and as for the still attacking part.. idk i guess u hav to talk to my ldr for that tongue i jus do as im told and btw.. serenity shouldve took the nap 2days ago... with the planets ur losing now.. its not even worth it .. 58 should just nap... but according to serenity( again) they will fight us to the end hmm unless he changes his mind and talks to render

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

render has withrawn his nap offer and will not nap 58 anymore, if my information is correct