Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

[22:29] <DarkMetrex> geeeez
[22:31] <DarkMetrex> you were all happy go lucky like am hour ago
[22:31] <DarkMetrex> haha
[22:34] <HappyJedi> i'm still happy
[22:34] <HappyJedi> always happy smile
[22:34] <DarkMetrex> sigh
[22:34] <DarkMetrex> man that was a gay post lol
[22:34] <DarkMetrex> you were hardly that angry when you were talking to me lol
[22:34] <HappyJedi> your alliance is being very gay too smile
[22:35] <DarkMetrex> actually 52 is
[22:35] <DarkMetrex> you take it up with them personally
[22:35] <HappyJedi> LOK is in 52?
[22:35] <DarkMetrex> + Lok wasnt nailed for cheating
[22:35] <DarkMetrex> no
[22:35] <HappyJedi> haha
[22:35] <DarkMetrex> he wasnt banned
[22:35] <DarkMetrex> which means
[22:35] <DarkMetrex> he did nothing wrong
[22:35] <HappyJedi> i seen the messages man lol
[22:35] <DarkMetrex> i dont care
[22:36] <DarkMetrex> you obviously conversing with 51
[22:36] <HappyJedi> besides, to void on 52 is to void on you both
[22:36] <DarkMetrex> agreed
[22:36] <HappyJedi> but i still havent decided if i will void or not yet smile
[22:36] <HappyJedi> since it is at my discression
[22:37] <HappyJedi> conversing with 51 is lol
[22:37] <HappyJedi> go get me checked out... i dare you wink
[22:37] <DarkMetrex> i cbf since Lok wasnt banned
[22:37] <DarkMetrex> i have no reason to delve into it

ok? tongue

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

ok waht?

"Heh heh heh heh heh heh!"

Metrex

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

point here is, 52 are violating nap terms set when we signed the nap, if they haven't removed these naps violations then the nap is void... simple as that, the nap stand with both 49/52 so that would mean the nap wit 49/52 is VOID, so sort your asses out as we have been asking for those planets for a long while now.

i want a clean war! even if it is one sided, i will still fight it

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

ofc ofc we dont intend to win by illegality as you can see 52 is inactivish both 49 and 48 have exchanged violations in harmony.. so yeah.. i suggest 52 remove the core vios asap so they dont have an excuse to break nap.. i agree with Flashy but i doubt he would like to win via breaking nap.. so yeah ill try get 52 onto this asap aswell dont worry guys..

still luv you Flashy lol

"Heh heh heh heh heh heh!"

Metrex

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

void* not break wink

31 (edited by Sabaoon2 09-May-2010 12:30:25)

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

alliance is with 2 l's

and how can this be an allience war when it's clearly a 2 vs 1?

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

it's also written with an "a" as in alliance, but no one's complaining about that right. don't be a spelling nazi wink

Maar doodslaan deed hij niet, want tussen droom en daad,
Staan wetten in de weg en praktische bezwaren,
En ook weemoedigheid, die niemand kan verklaren,
En die des avonds komt, wanneer men slapen gaat.

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

thanks for the correction, I will edit it this instant

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

Bitch you still have to pay us planets

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

true, 21. working on it atm :\.

Maar doodslaan deed hij niet, want tussen droom en daad,
Staan wetten in de weg en praktische bezwaren,
En ook weemoedigheid, die niemand kan verklaren,
En die des avonds komt, wanneer men slapen gaat.

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

> Flash[light]ning wrote:

> point here is, 52 are violating nap terms set when we signed the nap, if they haven't removed these naps violations then the nap is void... simple as that, the nap stand with both 49/52 so that would mean the nap wit 49/52 is VOID, so sort your asses out as we have been asking for those planets for a long while now.

i want a clean war! even if it is one sided, i will still fight it


war will be clean, defences will be removed. Only one attacker doesn't seem to hand in. Tough they are getting his planets smile Our family member DEATHSTAR managed to defend planet 16 in the 45,53 system against an attack by forces from HappyJedi, family 3448. So I have faith in both LFA and HJ to sort it out and get this planets back where they belong, to 48.


As leader of 52 i apoligise for the core violations and give my word when I say Ill try to get them back asap to you guys.

Ty

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

lol i dropped NW to take his planet... he left his figs out so i hit them twice, putting him under my range again tongue

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

Ah its so great and after i thought this was the perfect round sad

Sigh....

True LEGEND

39

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

> Smack My chicken wrote:

> > Flash[light]ning wrote:

> point here is, 52 are violating nap terms set when we signed the nap, if they haven't removed these naps violations then the nap is void... simple as that, the nap stand with both 49/52 so that would mean the nap wit 49/52 is VOID, so sort your asses out as we have been asking for those planets for a long while now.

i want a clean war! even if it is one sided, i will still fight it


war will be clean, defences will be removed. Only one attacker doesn't seem to hand in. Tough they are getting his planets smile Our family member DEATHSTAR managed to defend planet 16 in the 45,53 system against an attack by forces from HappyJedi, family 3448. So I have faith in both LFA and HJ to sort it out and get this planets back where they belong, to 48.


As leader of 52 i apoligise for the core violations and give my word when I say Ill try to get them back asap to you guys.

Ty
=====================================

SmackOne dont make me post here, I am waiting a msg from you saying 'defenses removed' from a long ago, I know your intentions are good and it's your fam members who are lame, but talking about voiding naps, ours could be perfectly voided by now, only thing stopping me from doing it is
1 I am not that kind of a player
2 We are already at war to look for more trouble.

But honestly, using spots in our core to attack 48 when those planets are meant to be traded is not fair imo, overall when you're going 2 vs 1.

If you really want a FAIR war, some important trades should be done before it starts. I am neutral to this war, but dont want my core to be a battle zone for you guys while I sit and watch enemy fleets crossing the skies from east to west and people building lasertraps in it and such.
The same goes to 48, they have still to honour our nap, and you guys can go to war in the shares you earned out of our nap terms, ok? wink

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

Nobody is gonna violate anything... metrex chill out against HJ.. This war is supose to be fun. This is the big war.. We tought 47 would give us that. So HJ Flashy.. Go show youre musscles and lets have some fun!

If any of my fam or allies do smt thats not fair poke me ingame.

And yeah i know.. This aint a game.. Its IC..

<&Nolio> when NZ had their earthquake
<&Nolio> I hoped Luster was trapped somewhere

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

But honestly, using spots in our core to attack 48 when those planets are meant to be traded is not fair imo, overall when you're going 2 vs 1.


I had a msg from 61 to not attack those new fresh explored planets.. If he did not msg me i would not take em... It was like, watch out 48 is gonna get a share with you guys for compesation..

<&Nolio> when NZ had their earthquake
<&Nolio> I hoped Luster was trapped somewhere

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

besides all this, the time of cancellation sucks anyway, nice planning on 49/52's side. time of war is very bad timing for 48's attackers hmm

43 (edited by Undeath 12-Jul-2010 15:54:23)

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

> Tja wrote:

> Nobody is gonna violate anything... metrex chill out against HJ.. This war is supose to be fun. This is the big war.. We tought 47 would give us that. So HJ Flashy.. Go show youre musscles and lets have some fun!

If any of my fam or allies do smt thats not fair poke me ingame.

And yeah i know.. This aint a game.. Its IC..





Tja please cut the crap..... Nothing is going to be fair and fun. You guys, especially 49, never wanted to have a fun and fair war with us. First of all it's a 2 vs 1, pretty sure we talked to 49 of letting our allies out of it but they didn't want to hear about that. To tell you the truth, we might be not be able to win a 1 vs 1 against 49 but you guys seem to want to have the help of your allies that badly, fine we will try and manage somehow. Now the date of the war is like Flashy said very bad for us, none of our attackers can be online. We can only be online after a few ticks to see howmany planets we lost,  see all our shares cleared and bankers raided! Must be fun! When we asked Khoronis to move the date of the war he said no because he's scared we will out save them. How the [bleep] can we outsave 2 famlies?? If that's not enuff, LOK also tried to get more shares with us through 51. All dirty shit and nothing fair about that.

About those compensation planets with 61, it's quite simple. We are not allowed to explore south because of nap 47, north is already full with 55/51 and east is already full with us. Hmmm east, south, and north full, what does this leave us? Oh that's right west of our core, which happened to be a few systems where you guys were in. Be happy you get more shars with our bankers!

have fun farmining us to oblivion

44 (edited by Flash[light]ning 09-May-2010 13:59:13)

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

couldn't agree to this statement anymore. perfect sum up of proceedings, not that 49 are cowardly for cancelling at such a time, its bloody good planning, just so happens, we won't be able to fight for first couple ticks, which are the most important


edit: i guess, all i am saying, is that is a shame this war (the best war i would have been in for a long time, easily 400 shares between the families) is pretty much decided before it starts

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

BULLSHIT!

You guys were planning this war, you guys saw how we cleared out 47 so easy and got scared or smt.. You guys should have dropt 61 and prepared for us streight away.. And do i need to bring up last round with HJ and tryme? This is so lame....

Or do you guys wanna do a eor jump? *does a chicken dance*

<&Nolio> when NZ had their earthquake
<&Nolio> I hoped Luster was trapped somewhere

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

> Tja wrote:

> BULLSHIT!

You guys were planning this war, you guys saw how we cleared out 47 so easy and got scared or smt.. You guys should have dropt 61 and prepared for us streight away.. And do i need to bring up last round with HJ and tryme? This is so lame....

Or do you guys wanna do a eor jump? *does a chicken dance*




Lol I laughed when I read this.

1. You guys have been saving for 3 days straight after our war with 61 while we were doing infra jumps, so don't tell me you haven't been planning this.
2. If you guys weren't scared like shit of us then you would have done a 1 vs 1.
3. If you guys weren't scared like shit of us then you would have extended the war date.

IMO 52 does not deserve to be called a true winner since all they have done is infrawhore
IMO 49 does not deserve to be called a true winner since they do everything they can not to fight us 1 vs 1 .

I was so looking forward to this war, it was going to be epic but this just sucks.

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

scared? 47? tbh, i wanted to war render more than you as he beat us down earlier in round and i thought pay back would be quite nice.


we warred 61 to gain planets, simple as, i stuffed up big time and stopped our war going as well as it should have, so then, we cut and run grabbing off of 61 what we could, after that, we had a tonne of explos stocked so we infra'd, we aren't scared of anything or anyone, we knew a war with you would end badly on our side, but now that we can't even login for start it will be even worse.

and yeah, last round, nice one for bringing up MY mistakes, thanks, makes me feel brilliant tja, a nice PERSONAL attack, i am only human, i made a mistake last round and i payed for it, i lost my family the round, im not perfect you know.


and no, we hadn't even started saving until less than a day ago, we have been doing jumps to fill our planets and get them ob just to catch you guys infra up, 49 have been saving for over 2 days as their nw stopped growing. so EOR jump is the least of things on my mind thanks.

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

I was not talking about youre mistake flash.. I think it was dishounerd what HJ and Tryme did.. And it was my big mouth what screwed us.. So screw those feeling flashy.. Now come and  get a hug. And its nice youre still playing!

Look.. can we please focus on the war now. I am sure we wont outjump you guys that much.. And our allys will get there first warr this round. They aint that active. It will be a fair war, no worries.

But awnser this question: Should we go and do a EOR jump or do a war?

<&Nolio> when NZ had their earthquake
<&Nolio> I hoped Luster was trapped somewhere

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

Tja, after last round, i nearly quit tongue i made a horrible 2 or 3 big mistakes and lost the round within a few days. it sucked majorly after leading the round for 5weeks. abd thats the last on that tongue

now i want war over EOR jump anyday, i am just saying, no matter about jumps, our attackers can't get online as of the timing of the cancellation, now imo this is awesome planning and really good sound tactics, i jus think its sucks as its my family who will be cleared out before we can have a chance to do the same! so that is why i think its decided already unless war date is changed. but in the end, its a war, not a peace march and you use everything you can (honorably) to win. so gl and hf taking our planets tongue

Re: PW ALIANCE WAR 49/52 vs 48/58

I treebeard, vice-leader of 3446, will not acknowledge 49/52 as the true winners if they continue with the current 2 vs 1.