Re: MW war status and player controlled ranking system

i say this as the grandfather of ic attackers

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

27 (edited by Prophet_WS_IC_Legend 20-Apr-2010 14:35:09)

Re: MW war status and player controlled ranking system

@NW

lmao WS; We have been 1st all round. go back into retirement retard.


of course moron thats because I am not playing or you would be dead already smile


My main fun was and always will be taking down the number one fam and did it many times smile

You would be the easiest ever

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

Re: MW war status and player controlled ranking system

lmao parrot your such troll not even going to read this thread.

Anarchy

Re: MW war status and player controlled ranking system

WS still editing his crappy posts

might try the button next to it;

DELETE

Re: MW war status and player controlled ranking system

Nightwish you gotta go to Preferences for that tongue

"Heh heh heh heh heh heh!"

Metrex

Re: MW war status and player controlled ranking system

dont say Preferences to NW cause he will think you mean sex wise and he will have to post "men"

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

32 (edited by RotCeV 21-Apr-2010 02:10:43)

Re: MW war status and player controlled ranking system

here's a thought.  have negative points for cheapish tactics and what not.  would change it a lot actually and def make it more balanced.

like 36's cheapish tactic can be like -3  semi farming can be -1.  why reward stuff like that?

example

1. Lets Make Love (3436) [57,76]     1283     8163262     69526

- 3427 +3 (good sor raid)
- 3423/3434 +2 (s4 clearning)
- 3438 0 (semi farming)
- 3408 -1 (cheapish tactic) (wasnt that cheap)

TOTAL +4

2. 1     ### #O## ##s# ##e ##L### ## ## (3409) [17,68]     1213     9437489     65717

- 3434 +1 (skirmish s3)
- 3423/3434 +2 (s4 cleaning)
- 3427 -1 (nw difference too much)
- 3408 +1 (good assist)

TOTAL +3

3. 2Drunk2Find Delete Button (3408) [100,42]     920     5631255     61301

- 3407 -1 (helping ally) (not helping ally, doing the whole thing)
- 3434 +3 (good raid)

TOTAL + 2

Re: MW war status and player controlled ranking system

3. 2Drunk2Find Delete Button (3408) [100,42]     920     5631255     61301

- 3407 -1 (helping ally) (not helping ally, doing the whole thing)

?

it was only me who actually did some damage, my other attackers did do that much and what makes helping ally a cheapish tactic?

if it were i would used 1 day's resources and cash to jump fleet and i would got all the planets 07 had with a war declaration in 2 or 3 ticks... that wouldve been cheep, as i told 07 at the time i was only balancing things, it wasnt a fully scaled raid, nor planned, i just sent random fleets to random systems :S

loyalty, respect and honor is what makes this game so great
dpenguins, Royal Toilette, Aaron SK, Evil, Lilith, Aleph ATE

34 (edited by RotCeV 21-Apr-2010 21:46:28)

Re: MW war status and player controlled ranking system

how about the fact we were way below 35% nw of u guys and 30 was actually higher in nw then us.  im sure they woulda had a chance against us 1 on 1.  they did attack first as well.  oh and we didnt lose any planets to 30.  only to u guys and u clearred all my major ports i had in their systems which they couldnt take.  its not fun when the 1 guy attacking us has more nw then our entire fam, blowing all my laser traps with just left over fleet. and then of course more of ur attackers started helping towards the end.  (still at this point 30 was doin nothin against us)

and i never said it was a cheapish tactic. just ur allies didnt need help for a fight they started.

and besides i had to figure out a way to balance u guys to be third and not second or first. lol

Re: MW war status and player controlled ranking system

whin3r big_smile

I NUKE U X(