Re: Pretenders vs Contenders new MW round 2
update anyone?
Sun Tzu
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Universal News → Pretenders vs Contenders new MW round 2
update anyone?
I dont see where 09 and 36 won, 08/30 have very good attackers and 08 is leading eco by far. 34/23 is good. 32 isnt bad aswell i dunno their allies...
race for win is still more than open, and rankings for under could be fun aswell if ppl are active.
BTW i agree that rounds should be 1 month or 1.5 month max since u can do all during this period, more is wasted time for everybody.
update! all fams ![]()
lets see how rounds ends...
btw i dont know if you noticed, but 30 should be the most warlike fam in this round ![]()
Kollop the problem is that 08 has too few members, we cannot afford to have small afk attackers..
And aparently the only way 36 knows how to fight is by ilfiltrting cores using small attackers...
Wow isnt that what your allies did to us Noir?
stop being a hypocrite .
you always lost that way.
Glue its what you did to us?
What 30 did to you im not sure actually.. but you started that game vs us and them...
I just feel its pathetic that the top families of the galaxy is fighting eachother with miniature attacker exploring into core systems to portal up while hiding under nw protection... No skill, no real fight, just abuse... Happend to me twice this round allready, and for the about 4th round in a row. These 35% rules are destorying the game, make it ahrdcore to remove this pussy play
go play ICC Lite with your friends Noir.
I'm sure u'll be able to find 5 of your love bunnies.
4 man SD hardcore ftw...
Lol glue, you guys were double nw than us when started to hit us... and still oversized us...
4 Dont fear us much... (3432) [8,19] 667 3870931 48651
vs
8 Never drink and war! (3430) [36,3] 635 2320196 35490
---------------
Family 3432
---------------
347 successful attacks against 3432.
293 lucky strikes by 3432.
263 planet(s) involved in the raging conflict.
168 of them are currently under our control (143 by retake)
90 of them are occupied by 3432 (72 by retake)
-----------------------------
We are UP by 78 planet(s).
lol tico you fail to mention things like we stopped attacking you while we were discussing a nap that was going to happen, then u raided us and opp'd all our bankers, inactivity hit us a little bit with retakes but thats no excuse.
While our attackers were clearing your portals u got 08 to run their fleet because u couldn't do it youself, and lets not forget as noir points out that this was all because "we" started it on 08, by retaking a few of our planets that 08 removed from almost all of s1 outside of our core, and took 2 of noir's portals and 1 of roar's, so yes carry on talking like you did all of this
Dont you have anywhere else to bitch fight about Tico ?
I was talking to Noir, not you.
Also you know very well what 3430 did Noir since you run my figs to half yesterday after their small guy jumped to attack us.
So stop being a hypocrite if 3436 is donig that to you, i guess payback is a bitch ![]()
Also for Tico, planets without infra is not rly cool.
This is not done by far you know it and i know it.
3408 is gonna help you out as soon as they can declare war on us.
You can have planets and do retakes we might not be a family with alot of attackers and good ones or atleast experienced but we are not done yet.
and we still have a ton of infra infront of you.
good luck winning this, because in the long run.. you lose.
The 35% rule for families I can understand, but for individual players it gives full families who can afford to have small attackers too big of an advantage.
Not that IC ever has managed to implement any sort of sensible rules, makes me wonder why I even bother.
I agree with KittyKat. The 35% rule for individual players doesn't do anything other than open for abuse by high NW families with more players. Also, the increased construction cost from empire size for individual players (again as opposed to based on the family NW) is an additional advantage to families with more players - As if these families didn't already have a big enough advantage from more starting gc/resources, ops, exploration ships and morale.
If anything the game mechanics should be in such a way to diminish the advantage of larger families, rather than to assure them an ever increasing advantage without their members actually having to be better players than those in other fams.
Please use the ideas forum if any of you 2 have any ideas.Its so easy to blame the game's mechanics but noone of you care to improve it.
...god
i pet a donkey at a petting zoo once
I love fearing the 35% rule because every time we get within 35% of a specific family, they rape us for a dozen planets until we fall back under protection. Lame.
wear a glove
well while you guys are in here you are missing out on what should be the biggest conflict in the galaxy ![]()
Nope, not conflicts, just "rapes" caused by exploits.
lol noir, its kinda unfortunate.
Noir should have had me: small inactive attacker ![]()
Well a 10 member family obviously cannot compete with 12 player families when clearly the most valuable player you can have in an inactive little bugger who can abuse nw limits.
Call me up when theres a HC round, cause sry to say atm IC is just not interesting to me
Imperial Forum → Universal News → Pretenders vs Contenders new MW round 2
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.