Re: 3229 & 3232 vs 3224 & 3234

if our allies hadn't fought 25/27 then our alliance would still be nearly at the same amount of planets as 25. but because they farmed 32 to dust, they are ahead, if anything, if things had gone to my plan, we would have beat up on 37, then 24/34 and be ahead by now. but things went to shit

Re: 3229 & 3232 vs 3224 & 3234

nothing ever goes according to plan unless you NAP the entire galaxy and infrawhore, then you can basically do whatever you want (based on your infrawhoring skills of course).

Re: 3229 & 3232 vs 3224 & 3234

i know things don't always go to plan, but i didn't expect it to go this badly in the wrong direction tongue usually one or two things go wrong, we had about 8 at once

Re: 3229 & 3232 vs 3224 & 3234

At least you didn't fight the entire galaxy, get raided to shit and now cancelled on the top fam for lulz big_smile

30 (edited by Sabaoon2 23-Mar-2010 22:28:48)

Re: 3229 & 3232 vs 3224 & 3234

@Flashy, you kno howmuch time it actually takes to capture 150 planets?! Even if 25 would have captured that amount you could have still done retakes and kept them busy. Also it was a 48 hr cancel so you had 2 days savings as well......anyways what's done is done

Re: 3229 & 3232 vs 3224 & 3234

sabaoon2, they would have ruined us, its that simple, they had at least 100+ more shares than we did and they were with all our bankers, we would have gone down harder than 32 did, not because we have no skill but simply because of the vast amount of shares, that is where 25 did a hell of a good job, now paying 150 planets to them was total brilliance at first, we could have easily over taken them if things gone our way, but they didn't and tryme gave them another 150-200 planets by getting farmed, and our next wars we lined up haven't exactly happened. but hey, this is all experience, and next time i shall do things a lot differently.