> psyclOnE wrote:

> Fella's its a game, they think we broke NAP, we think they broke NAP, let's just all get over it. Shit happens, we got 2 v 1'd, nothing we can do there, everyone has memory's, they've all been where we are, they all know what it's like, it's a cycle, next round it'll be a different fam, who cares, its all part of the game.

never say it will be a diff fam next round, because i tought so as well.. But after our nice friend polder (allies) raping the sould out of us and now this this round...

@Tryme :

Lol, how you get that screwed? Are you repeating that mantra to yourself until you believe it to be the truth and the only truth?

Or are you hoping that ppl will read only your lies and think you

Also speaking about repeating mantra's, you seem to want to convince yourself you are doing this in case of honor and such, whilst it is obviously you are only doing this to win size. Also our nap couldn't be voided only broken, which is exactly what happened, so cut the crap.

> Whineme wrote:

> Smack one you had 3 hours to make me an offer, 1 fam can't just decide to make a nap... IT takes 2 signatures ours and 27 was missing. Also anybody in 3227 should just shut the f up, I gave you 3 hours of notice before war was gonna start, without your allies you would still have been pwned to the ground. In just 15 ticks i managed to make 3 of your players delete... So don't take any credits you don't deserve.

without allies they probabely would have.... but that's where allies are for

More -=Retired=- then the other bitches

> Wouterlicious wrote:

> HAHAHAHAHA U MAKE ME LAUGH!!!!

Remember previous round?? We got farmed by u and your fam for ages!!! U took all our planets and left nothing! Excuse was that we were in NW range. And u kept on farming and now u and your fam are in the same position, with difference u pulled one of your dishonourable tricks again, and u are whining???? U called me one and said i should shut up!!!

U can do the same now HAHAHA serious u are pathetic...

Rolling.. it was 26 who farmed us last round and the attacker was TYMO not Tryme.

All messages in order of when they were sent.

[22:43] <@away> nap 25-29 is settle
[22:43] <@away> nap 25-32 is settled
[22:43] <@away> nap 29-27 is settled
[22:44] <@away> need to decide if 27-32 is on or not
(Above says its upto to 27/32 to decide if they want to War, all other NAPS signed.)

[22:48] <@away> fi 29-27 is not signed then all nap would be voided
(Above says the exact opposite.)

[23:08] <@away> 29 is pnaped with 27 and 25
[23:08] <@away> 25 is pnaped with 32
[23:08] <@away> 27 and 32 are going to finish the nap now or go to war in a few ticks
(Then the opposite once again)

[23:57] <@tja> yes?
[23:59] <SCHMACK> nap is ok?
[23:59] <Brown> we fight
(Tryme decides to War)

[00:15] <Zan|poker> is this yet again one of those moments where someone uses technicalities to get dishonorable war?
(Well we've changed our mind 3 times on the terms, technicality, yes, broken nap?)

[00:27] <Zan|poker> and it was agreed that you give one to 27 if they so decide, they decided so and that sealed the NAP
(well thats not what it says above now is it?)

00:32] <Brown> it is our decision
[00:32] <Zan|poker> no
[00:33] <Brown> 'our'
[00:33] <Zan|poker> no
[00:33] <Brown> and theirs
[00:33] <Zan|poker> no
[00:33] <Brown> yes
[00:33] <Zan|poker> no
[00:33] <Zan|poker> no
[00:33] <Zan|poker> no
(so who's decisiion was it?, i've read the entire convo, tryme said he'd give them 3 hours to decide, then he didnt give them the 3 hours, in the meantime, you agreed to the NAP, is it Tryme's fault that things changed in that 3 hours and he decided he'd be better of going to war given the change in circumstance's probably, but he didn't break any nap)

So overall, was Tryme sneaky and exploitative, YES!, but did he do anything wrong, morally, maybe yes, but actually illegally wrong? No, we never had a NAP, we only had a NAP with 25, not 27.

25 agreed to the NAP before the NAP with 27 was agreed to,  I know you said above that if we don't nap 27 then all NAP's are void but that hasn't stopped you taking 150 planets off our allies now has it as compensation so clearly some of the NAP's are still in place and not voided, you cant void one and not void another.

End of Story.

tbh ill not even waste my time posting the chat and explaining what happened. psy distorced showing only what is needed to prove that he is correct and there are missing parts on this chat. i dont care. ill keep hitting until pmode is on or nw difference or change leadership and tryme and hj quit the fam.

GOooo! 25!

Shizzle on my nizzle!

~Jimbeolous~

[21:32] <@away> we cant let 27 alone
[21:32] <ACDC> we won't let 27 fight 32 alone
[21:32] <Zanharim> not going to happen

[21:41] <Zanharim> so, we must either fight as an alliance or PNAP as an aliiance

In between here we decided that 27 can have a choice if they want to PNAP or fight 32, because they were not present in convo. At some point Tryme told he will PNAP, but only if he doesn

"Happyjedi was happy about breaking a pnap and admitted that your fam broke the pnap. With that being said, anyone voting tryme as leader is being punished as well because doing so makes them just as dishonorable"

suporting Tryme's decision which was not a nap break... serenity, you dont belong in this discussion because it has nothing to do with you

RedLink, its your stupid fault for assuming we would want to NAP your weak ally... what kind of noob leaves before negotiations are even finished? you are that kind of noob

@29 yous are pussies

@25... psyclOnE is saying if the alliance nap was voided, why do you still have nap with 29? voiding half a nap? or just breaking whatever half of the nap suits you?

wait are serenity and tryme plahying together lol?