• Tja
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1,086

Re: 3227 vs 3232

this is kinda lame.. we told tryme to hold his horses.. Link broke the nap and we kinda shouted at him tho not to breake it. Because all our attacker have stuff to do today.
Then they breake the nap and get a p-nap..

For honour and glory right....

This stinks..

<&Nolio> when NZ had their earthquake
<&Nolio> I hoped Luster was trapped somewhere

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,038
  • Tag points: 23

Re: 3227 vs 3232

lolo serenity, who would that honorable player be that leaves when you leave, you dishonorable piece of sh*t

I survived the Test? of 12-4-03, anyone remember that?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,590
  • Tag points: 70

Re: 3227 vs 3232

Tja, Link cancelled the 48hr NAP, breaking is something totally different. smile

Then we negotiated a PNAP to you guys too, so you wouldn

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,999
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 3227 vs 3232

canadian, la strika and tja deleted. Hence we offered a free pnap.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,271

Re: 3227 vs 3232

77 planets? haha, thanks but no thank Tryme wink

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,999
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 3227 vs 3232

that was before your deletes smack...

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 4,170

Re: 3227 vs 3232

wow 27 gets attacked by allies last round and screwed over by tryme this round.

sorry guys, you were doing well to.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,999
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 3227 vs 3232

a pnap offer for only return of retakes is on the table now. 3227 doesn

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 4,170

Re: 3227 vs 3232

i wouldn't give your fam a pnap for the sole fact you've got the gayest fam pic around

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,999
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 3227 vs 3232

Maybe, definate no has been given from 27 side. Only reason i can think of, is 25 planning to break our nap...

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,271

Re: 3227 vs 3232

why wouldn't we nap then? we can't do to much and it wouldn't be a big surprise, would it tryme

Hey flip, where're you? smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 4,170

Re: 3227 vs 3232

yooo smackone big_smile. just been going through mw trying to find a nice fam for next round. got one now 25th score 7th size my type of fam.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,271

Re: 3227 vs 3232

Lol, send me an ingame mail just to check who're you

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,999
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 3227 vs 3232

I won

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,271

Re: 3227 vs 3232

Lol, goldfishes aren't that tasty at all Tryme, so do not worry yet, you never know, maybe they wont eat all of you

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 399

Re: 3227 vs 3232

Lol ask 25 if they like goldfishes, i only like fishticks big_smile

You can't build real life Cash Factories, but you can build Living Quarters and increase your populations tongue

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,999
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 3227 vs 3232

Fleet Admiral SexPistols TrueLove 2480979gc 52 [ONLINE]

3225 voided nap. Fight to the death!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,271

Re: 3227 vs 3232

1    SexPistols    TrueLove    56    2480979
2    Brown    Matte    68    1185305

They got'ya dancing my dear friend

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,999
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 3227 vs 3232

yeah fair fight, lol

outjumped and hit without expecting it, as it was a nap break a signed thingy

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,590
  • Tag points: 70

Re: 3227 vs 3232

We had a PNAP with 32, but one clause was that 27 can decide if they want to PNAP 32 or fight them. 32 didn

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,999
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 3227 vs 3232

This means alliance nap is void? you can't just void half a nap...

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

47 Reply by Zanharim (edited by Zanharim 15-Mar-2010 08:17:35)

  • Posts: 2,590
  • Tag points: 70

Re: 3227 vs 3232

If there was alliance NAP, how could you have NAP with us and not with 27?

And this also clearly state that they are differen NAPs...

[23:07] <@away> our nap is done
[23:08] <@away> 29 is pnaped with 27 and 25
[23:08] <@away> 25 is pnaped with 32
[23:08] <@away> 27 and 32 are going to finish the nap now or go to war in a few ticks
[23:08] <@away> i gtg
[23:08] <@away> as there is no war

I told you that I will start finding any possible loopholes from NAPs from now on... have fun.

Also there is no statement in our PNAP that one fam could not void it partially. So, if we would have a reason, we could void our PNAP with 29 and let 27 and 29 be PNAPed still. You should make better NAP next time and include all kinda things from simple clauses to force majeures.

Isn

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,744
  • Tag points: 70

Re: 3227 vs 3232

"And this also clearly state that they are differen NAPs..."

Thus making you a nap breaker... you are so stupid

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 6,555
  • Tag points: 90

Re: 3227 vs 3232

nope, its the Galaxy thats stupid, next round will be the same old same old, only this time theres gonna be "revenge" from this round. PW just keeps on keeping on.........;) well....... tbh.... its getting worse.

~*✠ ]PW[ Forever ✠*~

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,590
  • Tag points: 70

Re: 3227 vs 3232

Nope, no NAP break really. We voided the PNAP because it was clearly stated that we don

0 Dislike 0 Post Points