Re: ** Pretenders Vs Contenders PinWheel 55 **

finally a PvC again. Thanks for the effort you put into it. Its a nice read after all the bitching you see in here!

Re: ** Pretenders Vs Contenders PinWheel 55 **

nice PVC! wink

Lohan - Dust in the wind

Re: ** Pretenders Vs Contenders PinWheel 55 **

lol @ serenity

if you wanna go there again..

You wanted planets from the fam dead last, with only a few planets left, and noone of the players involved in the war were still there, so you decided a bunch of new signings should pay for the people who deleted, not giving that fam any chance of regrowing.

But we discussed this last round already, showing youre true face, and with multiing now, you just proved yourself being an ass.

I survived the Test? of 12-4-03, anyone remember that?

Re: ** Pretenders Vs Contenders PinWheel 55 **

Nice PvC man....

More -=Retired=- then the other bitches tongue

Re: ** Pretenders Vs Contenders PinWheel 55 **

Nice PVC Gay, thanks wink

~*✠ ]PW[ Forever ✠*~

Re: ** Pretenders Vs Contenders PinWheel 55 **

Yup

Interresting read smile

I am in 3228, and I am hoping that we for a change get some infra whoring time to catch up smile

Re: ** Pretenders Vs Contenders PinWheel 55 **

2     Pokemon? (3224) [38,58]     29     40580     3721
Sun Tzu leading this pack. If this was an infrawhore galaxy, these would be my contenders ftw. They have alot of empty space around them and are closeby to there ally who are very strong! With the right attackers, this family should contend for top 5 but im not sure they have those attackers! With the right diplomacy, avoiding early wars, I put them contenders top 8.'


some update here:
Sun had an accident and handed over leadership. Allies got raided from 3 different ways at the same time and fallen behind but started to recover now. We wasnt able to avoid early wars but came out pretty equal so back on infrawhoring again:)

Flag of Halland/Sweden
2004-05-24     Graduated from Virgo with flying colors!

558

Re: ** Pretenders Vs Contenders PinWheel 55 **

nandro u still owe me 3 morales -_-

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

Re: ** Pretenders Vs Contenders PinWheel 55 **

> Forever wrote:

> Nice PVC Gay, thanks wink

Destiny is only for those too own to make their fate weak.

~ Geese

Re: ** Pretenders Vs Contenders PinWheel 55 **

Trying to find them atm Rin:)

Flag of Halland/Sweden
2004-05-24     Graduated from Virgo with flying colors!

Re: ** Pretenders Vs Contenders PinWheel 55 **

Nope, but decent winners do grant the losers some air to restart, especially once the treat is gone. And the attitude of "I dont care about new players, they are simply new enemies funding the war " makes you just about as lame and unhonourable as is possible.

I survived the Test? of 12-4-03, anyone remember that?

Re: ** Pretenders Vs Contenders PinWheel 55 **

i have a question.. does the standard nap rules contain this term as a standard term?

- cancellation must be given to leader and at least 2 VL's.

it has to be at the same tick? if its not at the same tick could be considered the start of the canceling time the last msg?

retired.

563

Re: ** Pretenders Vs Contenders PinWheel 55 **

Cancellation must be given to leader and at least 2 VL's.

- means cancellation is not effective until leader and 2 VL's get the cancellation message. So countdown will start from tick that 2nd VL get message ... simple@!

Re: ** Pretenders Vs Contenders PinWheel 55 **

I think the message must be sent the same tick to all three players (leader and 2 VLs) lol. Otherwise it's just weird, no?

Re: ** Pretenders Vs Contenders PinWheel 55 **

i agree temp. and it is included in a standard nap ? or its needed to be added as a term.. same thing is the alliance change that we are including this round after silvarias trickery of past 2 rounds smile

retired.

Re: ** Pretenders Vs Contenders PinWheel 55 **

nah its a clause u need to add. there is no such thing as a standard nap as naps aren't official in IC.

'Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway'

[no porn allowed]

Graduated from Virgo with flying colors!

Re: ** Pretenders Vs Contenders PinWheel 55 **

there is such a thing as a standard nap, it was made by TNT years ago smile

Re: ** Pretenders Vs Contenders PinWheel 55 **

if I search on my old harddrives I probabely can find that one somewhere tongue

More -=Retired=- then the other bitches tongue

Re: ** Pretenders Vs Contenders PinWheel 55 **

TNT Nap was no cores? Standard NAP with cores? Thats how it used to work? I can't remember, noone uses the lingo anymore tongue

Destiny is only for those too own to make their fate weak.

~ Geese

570

Re: ** Pretenders Vs Contenders PinWheel 55 **

standard nap is no cores, that's the reason you have to do a core clause. The 'core' thing was added to decrease competition so the bankers can infrawhore. Right now you have to add as many clauses as you need to avoid 'loopholes' tongue and even that way nothing stops people from breaking naps, so no point in it.
tongue
I mean, no matter how many clauses you add and how much you care about your nap writing, Rain will break it anyway.

571

Re: ** Pretenders Vs Contenders PinWheel 55 **

^thanx Serenity for putting this, I think some of you are mixing TNT with standard. Standard is basic nap, no cores, no need to warn the VLs, it is just a nap with a certain cancellation time, any clause you need to add you have to write it appart (core clause, ally clause, compensation clause, cancellation forms clause, etc...)

572

Re: ** Pretenders Vs Contenders PinWheel 55 **

> RedLink wrote:

> i have a question.. does the standard nap rules contain this term as a standard term?

- cancellation must be given to leader and at least 2 VL's.

it has to be at the same tick? if its not at the same tick could be considered the start of the canceling time the last msg?


so the answer is NO (as long as there's no aditional clause about it)

Re: ** Pretenders Vs Contenders PinWheel 55 **

> Render wrote:

I mean, no matter how many clauses you add and how much you care about your nap writing, Rain will break it anyway.


lololol


easy to guard against though, just put a DS in the system he's most likely to attack in.

<@Nick> it always scares me when KT gets all dominatrixy
* I_like_pie is now known as pie|bbl
<@KT|afk> Look at him run!
<@Nick> if you tell him to slap you and call you mommy
<@Nick> i'm leaving and never coming back

Re: ** Pretenders Vs Contenders PinWheel 55 **

Serenity stop cheating please.

575

Re: ** Pretenders Vs Contenders PinWheel 55 **

> Tryme wrote:

> Serenity stop cheating please.


don't you know you can't teach an old dog new tricks?