Re: 3149 & 3156 vs 3152 & 3157

The problem is not that the agreement says it can be cancelled; it's that it doesn't say it cannot.

The offer states a 48h NAP which will automatically expire "March 15th 22:00 GMT". If it is a regular 48h NAP, it can be cancelled at any time, just like any non-PNAP can. It just has the expiration clause, which means you can start attacks at that date.

I realise that is not the spirit of what you meant, but it's what is written and what everyone signed on.

Next time you have to be more accurate tongue

Re: 3149 & 3156 vs 3152 & 3157

@jerlundy

Your post is largely true except for this part:

"We wanted to give other planets to 57/52 so that they weren't all over our core.  57/52 did not stop until they had taken nearly 150 planets all over our core.  Mind u we asked them to stop much sooner."

We did stop when we were requested by Damaris and GeneralSkulls, feel free to consult with them.  We waited for them, and then they gave us coords of which planets to take.

I'm guessing noone cared that the coords were in your cores was because openly it was known that 49 were going to drop you.


00:00:30: <noir> just so this is clear, if 56 dont come up with planets, its their fault, ive done what i can to force them
00:38:31: <Noir2> and i really hope you get them
00:38:33: <Noir2> but its really out of my hands
00:39:19: <Torqez> well do what you have to. you agreed 56 would pay the planets. this was done under the assumption they would do it willlingly
00:39:36: <Torqez> if they dont, then you better sort something else out
00:39:47: <Noir2> there is nothing in the agreement that says willingly
00:39:53: <Noir2> they will pay the planets
00:40:05: <Noir2> please stay to the facts this time and dont weasel your way out
00:40:31: <Noir2> what assumptions ppl make are truly irrelevant is what youve teached me
00:41:47: <Torqez> thats the point noir
00:41:48: <Torqez> they are NOT paying the planets
00:41:59: <Noir2> then go take them from them
00:42:00: <Noir2> i dont care
00:42:12: <Noir2> we arent remaining allies
00:42:16: <Torqez> LOL

Re: 3149 & 3156 vs 3152 & 3157

Wrong Gen.

"The problem is not that the agreement says it can be cancelled; it's that it doesn't say it cannot."

If it doesn't say you cannot cancel it, then you can't be a hypocrite and "assume" it can be cancelled without explicitly saying that it can be either.

154 (edited by Genesis 08-Mar-2010 20:40:03)

Re: 3149 & 3156 vs 3152 & 3157

This is an offer from 57/52 to 49/56.

The components of the offer:
- 48H Alliance NAP reinstated in its entirety.
- 48H Alliance NAP expires on March 15th 22:00 GMT
- 3156/3149 agree to Pay 3157/3152 200 planets total (100 to 3152 and 100 to 3157). Planets will be paid within 2 days.

Signed Torqez (3157 and on behalf of 3152)


Nap offer accepted, planets will be paid from 56

Signed, Jenny of French Black (3149)


********

"- 48H Alliance NAP reinstated in its entirety."

So you're saying a 48h NAP can't be cancelled?

Re: 3149 & 3156 vs 3152 & 3157

If a date has been specified for the expiration of it, then yes, it cannot be cancelled earlier.

We all agreed when the time of War would be when we signed it.  All fams involved.

156 (edited by Noir 08-Mar-2010 20:49:18)

Re: 3149 & 3156 vs 3152 & 3157

Torqez your last post is absolutely false and i believe you know this yourself

The IC community makes 48h naps on a common basis, none of which have it specified, but all of which have it implied that the 48h refers to the cancellation time. By your logic most of the naps in IC are uncancellable, and for some reason people just like to call them 48h naps, even tho the 48h means nothing. I believe you are smart enough yourself to see that your logic is flawed, and that 48h NAPs are a reference to the 48 hours you have to wait from cancellation to the time attacks can start. This is elementary IC, and if you are in doubt to what is being referred to by 48h naps, go read up on TNT standard terms or so.

We made a 48h nap with autoexpiry on 15th march, its right in there in what you pasted. That is indisputable, the print and evidence have been posted by you personally.

Now like Genesis points out, i agree it was not in the spirit of the nap that was signed and that your family probably have made an assumption that it was to be regarded as a pnap til 15th, but it is in the writing pretty clearly that it is 48h, and when it boils down to it, it is what you actually sign that matters.

If you had treated me and my allies with some decency earlier i would never have enjoyed pulling a prank on you enough to cancel it 5 days early, but with the stunt you pulled at us, i felt compelled to get you back a little. I told you that when you start toying around with loopholes it will come back to bite you. Karma is a bitch, but consider us even.

For the record i still believe you will win, so stop the whining allright wink


SImply put for dyslexizxzxz

If the nap was not cancellable, why would it be referred to as a 48h nap, the old nap was cancellable and that is the nap that was reinstated, nothing else changed.

LORD HELP OREGON

Re: 3149 & 3156 vs 3152 & 3157

Here's how I would agree with you:


This is an offer from 57/52 to 49/56.

The components of the offer:
- Alliance NAP replaces the former 48h NAP agreement
- Alliance NAP expires on March 15th 22:00 GMT
- 3156/3149 agree to Pay 3157/3152 200 planets total (100 to 3152 and 100 to 3157). Planets will be paid within 2 days.

Signed Torqez (3157 and on behalf of 3152)


That would be what you're looking for. But by introducing the 48h component you opened the door to this.

To be safer you could even add a clause stating the NAP cannot be cancelled before its expiration date. However you didn't do this, so technically 49 is right. Even if it doesn't reflect the spirit of what you talked about back then.

Anyway this isn't even my war, I'll just let you keep haggling and go away tongue

Re: 3149 & 3156 vs 3152 & 3157

Torqez why bother. They have an agenda.

Venom

The real one not the one posing as 2.0.

Re: 3149 & 3156 vs 3152 & 3157

So hilarious!! Karma is a bitch, eh Torqez??

"an eye for an eye, a loophole for a loophole"

The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he, who in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness, for he&#65279; is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who would attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee!!

Re: 3149 & 3156 vs 3152 & 3157

If the nap was cancellable earlier Gen/Noir, whats the point of setting a date?  It was no where explicitly said that it can be cancelled earlier.

Anyway, by his own admission, Noir is obviously abusing a loophole.

Fine if you want to play that way smile

GL both sides.

I request my fam to stop arguing about this - since it's not getting through their heads.

Re: 3149 & 3156 vs 3152 & 3157

This ultimately comes down to... when the agreement was made out.  Both parties knew that the war date would be March 15, and not earlier.  And that was the substance of the agreement.  The substance of the agreement is taken into account, rather than the form.

Re: 3149 & 3156 vs 3152 & 3157

Bummer. It's too late to pull a mass vacation mode too hmm

Seems like both 57 and 49 have been yanking each others chains all round long. Before it seemed like 49 was under some sort of assumption that 57 would keep the NAP and they would have some agreed upon EOR war. Then 57 cancelled NAP upsetting 49.

Now it seems 57 was under the assumption that the expiration date of March 15th date would hold, although 57 should have been a bit smarter in thinking that 49 would not find some loophole and put them in a bad spot either. I have to agree with Genesis on this one.

Torqez look at it this way. Say you got a car loan and signed a contract saying the loan had to be paid off by March 15. The bank assumes you will pay it off by then, but you could pay it off early. That's why there's language in loans creating a penalty for paying it off early. If they had nothing written about it, you could pay it off early and then they lose the additional interest. You NAP says it expires March 15th, but nothing about that it can't be cancelled before that. I've run my own business for 20 years now and one thing i've learned from writing and also signing contracts is that if it's not in writing, it doesn't matter. Going by anything else, is making an assumption, and depending on what side your on, you may agree or disagree with it. And that does not make it right and/or wrong. Never assume anything.

But as with most dissagreements in this game, it all boils down to people going outside of the game features. If everyone just followed the NAP rules that are set in place, instead of creating massive NAP terms with dates, comps, etc. there would be no problems and complaining. Perhaps there should be some sort of rule, where if a family creates any NAP's with terms outside the game specified rules, the leader could be blocked. That would solve 99% of the problems everyone has. I came back after 6 years off and it's the same old story now as it was in beta 3 when NAP's became more common. They really could solve it all by putting a penalty on families that use things other than the game setup NAP.

"The market is like a.....game within a game Teddy"

Re: 3149 & 3156 vs 3152 & 3157

> AdriusAvangion wrote:

> So hilarious!! Karma is a bitch, eh Torqez??

"an eye for an eye, a loophole for a loophole"

The nerve of you coming in here making comments after you delete and left your fam hanging, Go climb back into the hole you been hiding in you Fag.

Pitbull(Humanoid - Once a Force scholar and teacher, turned Warlord. Vain, he believes he is the best fighter alive.
A warlord is a person with power who has both military and civil[1] control over a subnational area due to armed forces loyal to the warlord and not to a central authority.  And has the means and authority to engage in war

Re: 3149 & 3156 vs 3152 & 3157

IMO a 48h nap means when you cancel it gives the other part 48h to prepare for a war. That NAP was reinstated end of. One line included it will end on march 15th anyways.

I couldnt care less im fighting on the 10th c ya all there or maybe not. That way I can gain easy planets as well as 57/52 tried earlier on 56. I would love that.

True LEGEND

Re: 3149 & 3156 vs 3152 & 3157

The logic of insanity continues.

Venom

The real one not the one posing as 2.0.

Re: 3149 & 3156 vs 3152 & 3157

its soooo fun reading all this smile thank you guys smile

167

Re: 3149 & 3156 vs 3152 & 3157

I think its stupid tongue

''Everything is easy, Unless you make it difficult''
The Legend always returns

Re: 3149 & 3156 vs 3152 & 3157

IC politics at it's best. That is why I prefer to be a blunt tool.

Re: 3149 & 3156 vs 3152 & 3157

AA = Shemale

2009-11-11               Networth rank 9 - Champions Capri
2010-03-24               Networth rank 3 - Champions MW
2010-10-26               Networth rank 4 - fail king
2010-09-17               Size rank 5 - Champins SD
2011-04-06               Size rank 2 - champions MW

Re: 3149 & 3156 vs 3152 & 3157

I'm confused by everything

Re: 3149 & 3156 vs 3152 & 3157

Well, in happier news, the new Potomac Bead Company website is up:

www.potomacbeads.com

And I think we have a few new stores signed smile

Re: 3149 & 3156 vs 3152 & 3157

Hey I still need to talk to you about that yikes

173

Re: 3149 & 3156 vs 3152 & 3157

thats your company tongue?

LORD HELP OREGON

Re: 3149 & 3156 vs 3152 & 3157

I want a ruby

Re: 3149 & 3156 vs 3152 & 3157

Well torqez.... In you defense I was a bit inacurate.  We asked u guys to stop and once the message was actually received u did; however, many planets were still taken from us after our message was sent out.  Before u told the your family to stop taking out planets we sent messages out asking them to stop.  All your other members did was tell us to consult our leader as te deal had been made.  I wish we had saved those messages and the times with them, but I did not think it would be helpful in the future.

Anyways I'm about to get raped... Have a great day.

If a man speaks in the woods and no woman is around is he still wrong?