Topic: Religion = for the weak minds

How can anyone with a sence of self awareness beleave something that was first talkt about for 400 years b4 being written and than hasn't changed a bit for almost a thousand years..

Have you ever tried to stand in a str8 line with 10 friends and say 2 sentences to the first one witch has to quietly tell it to the second one and so on.. Eaven with only 1 or 2 sentances you usually get a result of approxomately 1 or 2 good words while the entire content will have shifted to a compleatly other cind of sentence..
If this is true than why do people not have the commen sence to not beleave a book that is insainly out dated and actually made in a time where whomen where of no more importance than your friendly neighbourhood goat..

I think religion is for the weak mind that has no oppinion of its own and doesn't beleave in moving forward.
Not so long ago people would actually kill you if you told em the world was round.. or if you told em that we would one day get from France to New york in under 12 hours. Fact is that things change so rapidly becaulse alot of people are trying to beter understand life its self instead of beleaving in a god. Our human nature to investigate and find the trueth in our problems makes us innovate new way's and beleave new idea's.

change is needed to strive forward, and quite frankly you should beleave your friends/family and your'self but not some book or a dude that hasn't had sex his entire life exept maby some small boy's..

get a life .. or atleast stop freaking bugging others with your bloody book..

Dutch bastard

Re: Religion = for the weak minds

as I understand it, Snailsex is asking who can we believe in Religion which is constantly talked about but is rarely seen today. Miracles, that "happened" often anyways.

And yes, I have played whisper down the lane. Some people mess it up on purpose.


"I think religion is for the weak mind that has no oppinion of its own and doesn't beleave in moving forward. "

actually, religion is for those who want something to believe in or desire more of in life. A fanatical theist is more dangerous than a blithe atheist. Not to mention religion provides people with a way to, well, seek redemption for guilt.


"Not so long ago people would actually kill you if you told em the world was round.. or if you told em that we would one day get from France to New york in under 12 hours. Fact is that things change so rapidly becaulse alot of people are trying to beter understand life its self instead of beleaving in a god."


Not so long ago, people were frivolous, foppish, closed minded, and somewhat paranoid. But they were smart, clever, resourceful and creative. Counterpoint: People today would kill you for being born in America (American Citizen). You can't change that you were born in America, you make the best of it, but you die for it anyways? I suppose we're all gonna die, but would you rather die knowing a God was watching over you and waiting for you to come to him or would you rather die and just be left at that?

Counterpoint (for second sentence): Compare today from say, 400 years ago, 500. Lets compare music. Rap. Need I say more? Beethoven, Mozart, etc. Eltara, who listens to metal, and some other dark stuff, listens to Beethoven, Mozart. 500 years ago, 1, us 0. Lets examine art. "New art". WHAT THE HELL!? And the other side? Raphael, Van Gogh, etc. Yeah, right. Compare literature. Vampires? Magic? probably forbidden in their society, but have we fallen that far? Compared with Frost, Tennyson, Twain and Shakespeare. Yeah. Lets examine military. Guns, tanks, guided missiles, ICBM's, shit, that's scary. And back then? Swords, shields, bows and arrows...trebuchets! Hmm, I think we can see who won. 500 years ago. And 500 years ago, religion was a major player in society. Course, they did some terrible things and were corrupt, but look at what was accomplished. Look at us today. What can we say we accomplished that is as effective as them? We still read books and literature from back then, plus examine and use their art for inspiration. Man, maybe we should stop trying to understand life, and focus more on a religion? tongue

And our human nature is to find solutions, not the truth. Some maybe, but our nature is curiosity and to find solutions. Oh and to "sin" tongue

And I'm not going to acknowledge the last 2 statements as they are just cheap shots.

Insane Lemming of Drama Queens and Other Hyperbolical People

1431 ftw

Re: Religion = for the weak minds

>>Have you ever tried to stand in a str8 line with 10 friends and say 2 sentences to the first one witch has to quietly tell it to the second one and so on.. Eaven with only 1 or 2 sentances you usually get a result of approxomately 1 or 2 good words while the entire content will have shifted to a compleatly other cind of sentence.. <<

Oral history was more important then. Don't project your own apathy and intellectual shortcomings on peoples who developed, valued, and used their memories much more than you.

>>If this is true than why do people not have the commen sence to not beleave a book that is insainly out dated and actually made in a time where whomen where of no more importance than your friendly neighbourhood goat..<<

Are you referring to the Bible? Parts were written long before the more current collection of works we know as the Bible today were put together and decided upon. They didn't write the different books at Nicea, they decided which ones were part of their faith and which were counterfeit. Also, the Bible gave more "value," to use your word, to women than had the societies of that area of the globe at the time.

>>Not so long ago people would actually kill you if you told em the world was round..<<

There was a time that the Church would, but unless you're prepared to engage the political/economic/sociological conditions at the time, this is probably pointless to discuss.

>>or if you told em that we would one day get from France to New york in under 12 hours. <<

Citation? I've never heard of such a case. Admittedly fascinating!

>> Fact is that things change so rapidly becaulse alot of people are trying to beter understand life its self instead of beleaving in a god. <<

Many scientists, including leading physicists, not only believe in God, but have their faith strengthened by their work. What are your PhDs in that your knowledge of science has discouraged faith in you? When have you seen belief in God interfere with scientific research? (presumably in modern times)

>>change is needed to strive forward<<

Is that like the Obama message, that we must change even what's working better than anything else the world has ever seen? Seems a little simple.

[I wish I could obey forum rules]

Re: Religion = for the weak minds

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iMmvu9eMrg&feature=channel

Re: Religion = for the weak minds

This is why you never heard of St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas and DesCartes and Dostoyevsky and Einstein

cause they had weak minds

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

Re: Religion = for the weak minds

Descartes was more intellectually challenged than Xeno, but I agree the others were brilliant.

Re: Religion = for the weak minds

I'm smart enough to know not to read any of the above posts, and I haven't, but I wanted to stop in and compliment the author on the title. Well formed troll!

Rehabilitated IC developer

Re: Religion = for the weak minds

I don't think this is a troll tongue although I hear he is rather ugly...but I can't say anything myself...if KT is reading this IGNORE THE PREVIOUS STATEMENT tongue


Aquinas was a little too into the theology imo when philosophizing. I prefer Kant or Aristotle, although I will say Kant was a bit heavy on the "nothing is important, everything we do is pointless" he had a point. Aristotle made more sense. But his ideals were VERY close to christianity. Not exact, but close enough that we can get away with it wink

Insane Lemming of Drama Queens and Other Hyperbolical People

1431 ftw

Re: Religion = for the weak minds

Justinian

"Descartes was more intellectually challenged than Xeno, but I agree the others were brilliant."

Nice.  Thank you.  So I'm higher on the pecking order then Descartes, and the others were merely brilliant.  Are you saying I'm a genius, Justinian?

Re: Religion = for the weak minds

"more intellectually challenged than Xeno" = You're intellectually challenged.

[I wish I could obey forum rules]

11 (edited by Justinian I 09-Mar-2010 22:07:05)

Re: Religion = for the weak minds

Xeno,

No, I am saying Descartes was scholar with limited brains.

Re: Religion = for the weak minds

Religion is for those that have faith.  Nothing more, nothing less.

=^o.o^= When I'm cute I can be cute.  And when I'm mean, I can be very very mean.  I'm a cat.  Expect me to be fickle.

Re: Religion = for the weak minds

Just want to comment on the religieuse person:

">> Fact is that things change so rapidly becaulse alot of people are trying to beter understand life its self instead of beleaving in a god. <<

Many scientists, including leading physicists, not only believe in God, but have their faith strengthened by their work. What are your PhDs in that your knowledge of science has discouraged faith in you? When have you seen belief in God interfere with scientific research? (presumably in modern times)"

This is not true, 93% of the scientis are NOT religieus and do not believe in god. Where did I get this information from? Watch the movie religulous time 11:10. I am confidant that if you are a moderate religieuse person that this movie will convince you in that there is no god. If you are an extremist - well may "god" help!

">>change is needed to strive forward<<

Is that like the Obama message, that we must change even what's working better than anything else the world has ever seen? Seems a little simple."

Just like you said that was a typically Obama message yours was a typically conservative right-wing message. I do understand why you are reluctant, it must be hard to believe there is no god if your whole life your family is telling you there is one.

Also I would like to add some additional information to the post of snailsex. Everyone is very confidant that the existance of Jesus has been proven but this is also not true, there is no evidance. Moreover, do you seriously believe there was a talking snake, "virgin" who gave birth to a child and the planet only being 5000 years old?!! There is evidence evidence that those parts are bullshit (there is nothing you can say against this, a fact is a fact)  and if you take that into account, is there not a possibility that more things written in ur holy book are false? Also the evolution theory is no longer a hypotheses, it's a fact and the planet is not 5000 years old and there was never a god which created all us of in 7 days. To think that leadng people in America, senators are believing in a talking snake and the earth being 5000 year old makes me really pissed. YES WE DO NEED A CHANGE!!!!

Re: Religion = for the weak minds

it seems like in most modern societies... the OP's view is common... so religious people are people that arent swayed by the negative views their society imposes on them and their religion... which would mean that the opposite of what the OP said is true...

Re: Religion = for the weak minds

" religieuse person that this movie will convince you in that there is no god."

If that movie convinces anyone of anything, they are the one with a weak mind.

Religions are here to stay for the simple reason that their tenets can neither be 100% proved nor 100% disproved, and, therefore, some people will always take religious tenets to be true on faith.  Studying philosophy doesn't help either, as, ultimately, what you learn is that 100% proof of anything is impossible.  Of course things can be proved to an extent, namely beyond reasonable doubt, however, what is deemed a 'reasonable' level of doubt varies from culture to culture and generation to generation, and, just like the validity or soundness of religion tenets themselves, what is 'reasonable' to believe about will remain debatable.

16 (edited by Sabaoon2 11-Mar-2010 18:54:12)

Re: Religion = for the weak minds

If your sister is a mother and she just lost her 3 year old boy and is in deep grief then what else is there that would make her feel better except that "he will go to a better place"? In the past and still now religion is used to comfort the people.

This however, was not the only purpose of religion. You have try and imagine a world without order, a world without police, a lawless world. What would stop people commiting crime like murder and thievery, answer: religion. If you can make people believe that they will go to hell for murder, thievery and all those other things then they will surely be intimidated and not commit those crimes (in most cases).

Richer people gave money to the poor and there were some other things good too about religion. Forexample, let's take the islam. They forbid people to eat pork, reason: Pig meat rots very quickly and in the past when we had no salt/frigerators so this was very problamatic since many people got sick. Forbid pork=problem solved.

The islam also says that you have to pray 5 times a day, reason: In Saudi Arabia (where the islam basically started) the climate is hot, as we all know hot weather makes people lazy and the hot weather makes them barely go out anymore. Also that they ate a lot of sheep contributes to the fact that they were fat. They needed exsercise so this was a perfect solution.

Basically, religion had a good purpose but has none left - well maybe to comfort people but then I ask you, is that really worth it? Is it worth to have so many leaders who believe in a talking snake (which seriously worries me) and so many people that believe the world is 5000 year old?

Howmany wars have there not been because of religion, howmany people have been killed by religion? Taliban destroyed Afghanistan in the name of religion, the church abused their power in the name of religion and I am not even talking about Jerusalam or all the crusades. Sum these things up and really think if this little comfort is worth it all. It's not only war and death that is brought in the name of religion but people are holding us back in the name of religion. Again and again they don't want changes! Abortion, GM are only few of the many examples.

Re: Religion = for the weak minds

You know, I must have commented on something like this in the other religion thread. There is no god or some such. Must we constantly talk about the same things every 3 weeks? hmm


and for the record, religion is the opium of the people.

Insane Lemming of Drama Queens and Other Hyperbolical People

1431 ftw

Re: Religion = for the weak minds

and for the record, Marx was an idiot academic without a clue.

[I wish I could obey forum rules]

Re: Religion = for the weak minds

actually Blind Guardian, Marx wasn't an idiot. He was rather smart, he just had little foresight. The irony being that although he was a superb sociologist and in some respect a philosopher, his opinions about changing the world weren't seen as well by others. Utopia will never exist, so Communism is never going to work. If there was such a thing as Utopia, odds are the ruling government would be communist that would slowly work its way into democracy then dictatorship and after a few years, maybe *maybe* a fundamentalist government. Until then, I'm proud of my democratic country (yeah, like, hell no. Everyone here is an idiot) at least back with Marx, people weren't AS stupid. They proved some intellect unlike 95% of Americans and about 50% of the rest of the world today.

Insane Lemming of Drama Queens and Other Hyperbolical People

1431 ftw

Re: Religion = for the weak minds

lol no comments on what I wrote?

Re: Religion = for the weak minds

Wow Sabaoon2 your post was intelligent, though poorly laid out. Your argument is extremely good.


Some suggestions...


1) Multiple paragraphs


2) Starting and ending


3) Inset a little humor to keep them going


4) Do not switch sides, but say but on the other side



I disagree with the fundements behind the last portion of your post, but it was well thought out. Just need to increase your writing skills online so people can read and understand quickly what you were saying.

Everything bad in the economy is now Obama's fault. Every job lost, all the debt, all the lost retirement funds. All Obama. Are you happy now? We all get to blame Obama!
Kemp currently not being responded to until he makes CONCISE posts.
Avogardo and Noir ignored by me for life so people know why I do not respond to them. (Informational)

Re: Religion = for the weak minds

Thanks 4 the compliment & advice, I will surely keep it in mind:)

Re: Religion = for the weak minds

Don't listen to Einstein. He's insane. Well, then again, most of IC is insane. Continue listening. smile

Insane Lemming of Drama Queens and Other Hyperbolical People

1431 ftw

24 (edited by blackers 15-Mar-2010 21:16:59)

Re: Religion = for the weak minds

i think people that refuse to believe there is some 1 higher then them are weak minded like u said world has developed and changed so fast  but the world has developed due to history we build of history. religion isn't just about being 1 gods slave its about believing and committing yourself to something. if God appeared at your front door every day you would soon loose interest as shall we say the idea would wear off. the whole side to religion is the fact you never know whats true and whats not if we knew all the answers life would be a sad place and to be honest bit sad for simple minded people like some of you to try and force people not to have an a opinion and a right to believe in what they want. why should u decide there simple for believing that we didn't just appear out of no where and i think people that cant understand peoples religions are in fact the simple minded ones as you have to always be right and have to feel you know everything. so instead of trying to prove why religion is fake let people believe in what they want and u carry on thinking you know everything but surly by trying to force people religion is wrong you are doing the same thing u say religion is doing and following an idea and believing in it ie big bang theory may not involve 1 man ie god but is still a opinion believed .

heavenlyslap