Re: Pretenders vs Contenders MW new round
I feel mildly obsolete with all the changes that have happened ![]()
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Universal News → Pretenders vs Contenders MW new round
I feel mildly obsolete with all the changes that have happened ![]()
key player: Portgas? what have you been smoking? ![]()
lol @ jeff, good job Mizzle considering many peeps dont want to be known lol, it does not matter anyways because when its time to step up their game we will know who is who. ![]()
Yeah Pitbull was hard making PvC when not knowing who is in what fam well at least I tried ![]()
i have the key of your house jeff
so watch it
1 Inactive as well as noobs.... (3149) [19,24] 52 86579 4989
Mizzle and Noir in a good ole gangbang of the sorts only vikings heard about. With Noir handling the eco they are flying up, and rightly so. I also know from personal experience their attacking lineup isnt halfbad either. Good strong allies and a solid take on gameplay. Dont expect them to acti dishonourable, but dont expect them to be nice either.
Keyplayer : Noir.
Contender for 1-3
~~
2 Wanted Now Already! (3157) [10,47] 47 82707 4717
Portgas with friends in a good lil mashtogether, its not a bad fam at all really. Got some good attackers in here, and solid allies. Dont know much about their ecoplanner, but seeing them climb the ranks gives me the idea he knows numbers fairly well.
I expect to see them cause more horror on the battlefield than in the infragame.
Keyplayer : Pitbull
Contender for 5-7
~~
3 ★ HEROES ★ (3152) [41,45] 50 79522 3654
Anubis banking ? WTF ? Lost a major attacking contender in that choice but whos to say this fag cant pull off attacking with revalons aswell ? A questionable decision that leads me to the conclusion he has too much faith in his attacking lineup.
They'll have to prove me wrong on this one. Aside from that good econ going and activity not far from splendid.
Too bad their leader likes sparkling men tho..takes away all the HC about them.
Keyplayer : Anubis (if he makes Revalons attack well)
Contenders for 1-3
~~
4 Speachless? (3127) [52,57] 43 75334 4195
There is Piggy and Valenka in here, but so is Acrid, and Acrid has the curse of neverwinningIC on him.
Thus they are bound to fail in the end. Good show tho and I'll gladly take Pigster and Val into my fam when they die.
That said...they will have to random.
As far as eco goes I cant complain, they got it better than me so far, so...good going ! But you got Acrid ! So I dont care !
hehe.
Keyplayer : Acrid
Pretenders for IC
~~
5 Clueless Army (3150) [99,4] 43 61850 4319
My fam.
Keyplayer : That guy there...you know..him !
Pretenders for IC
~~
6 We n00b you better (3151) [48,33] 36 60467 4384
Giantz fam, one of the strongest lineups by far from what I can tell, and they are performing...not up to their lineups greatness but not awfully either being top 6. Probably had some inactivity issues in the start and some speedbumps in the general maintenance of the fambank. i can see them shining over the hill in the end, so dont give them too much room. They wont give any back.
Keyplayer : Exposed
Contender for 1-5
~~
7 ~We Rock the 80s!!~ (3156) [8,68] 41 60461 4127
Counterstrike taking the lead of a really strong family on paper. Got good econ going staying in or near the top at all times.
If she can handle leading this ragged band, I dont see why them and their allies cant own something this round.
Oh and rockbands get all the sluts, so dont expect any waiting at the intergalactical truckstops.
Keyplayer : Counterstrike (cause she'll need to step up bigtime to lead these fellas)
Contender for 1-3
~~
8 The Family (3141) [50,55] 38 56887 4067
Kaboem and Kai, with a few random faces. Apparently Kaboem is doing econ decently, and they are top 10 NW in a galaxy of 40 families. Not bad not bad. Abit too random for my taste tho, and I dont necessarily see them succeeding in the long run.
Keyplayer : Kai
Contenders for something below top 10.
~~
9 Forbidden Love (3154) [83,34] 34 56404 3352
Jets. He's got PP and Kagar. He is a big fat liar. Dont trust him, ever, in any situation, or you fail.
Keyplayer : Not present
Pretender for any noticeable value.
~~
10 SKARHS (3128) [58,7] 31 55815 3597
Callous, Nox and Kin. Reminds me of the old days. I like this fam. Might turn some heads along the way too if they spin the right bottles and wink to the right girls. Also they will give a nasty bite leaving you only a pegleg if you dont swim fast.
Keyplayer : Nox
Contenders for 4-9
~~
11 Fundamental Extremists II (3161) [31,19] 31 54402 3453
Sup and Mung in same fam..reminds me of good ole Adeath. Good times, Good times. Not enough contending players to rock the world, will end somewhere below the top 10, sorry fellas. When you fail..if you feil before Piggy/Val fam, you two are also welcome to the TWO BRAND NEW OPEN RANDOM SPOTS IN MY FAM !
Keyplayer : mung
Pretenders for top 10.
~~
12 Famous for Kicking Balls! (3137) [96,43] 38 51548 3366
My allies. They suck nuts..but are a fun bunch in forums
Keyplayer : Darksider33 or whatever name he goes by these days..
Contenders for being my allies for at least another week.
~~
13 ~~Kings of the Forgotten Land~ (3143) [48,77] 31 51188 3896
IC Deaths fam. He will probably make them do better than what they originally planned to. Got some good folks in here, and may very well suprise quite a few people if he make them work together nicely.
Keyplayer : Swedish
Contenders for top 10.
~~
14 Zodiacs Of Milky Way (3142) [28,91] 33 50575 4230
Tidus's fam. I wish him the best of luck leading this bunch and I hope he does well in his comeback round. Used to be awesome attacker if fam is active. I hope he dont start attacking me.
Keyplayer : Tidus
Pretenders for top 10.
~~
15 Fail?!?! (3165) [41,36] 34 49994 4369
This fam got alot of talent but poor organisation. DDK is a machine on his own, and the utility of StrawWars..you gotta play him right but he rocks. Sadly tho..organisation is below standards.
Key player : DDK
Pretenders for top 10.
~~
Pitbull growls at damon real hard grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.
Charges his Ankh...
damon you scum noob, just cause i think twilight is good doesnt make me a fag, screw you! lol
Are you flirting with me ?
He mentioned me and I'm ubern00blet why would he think I ever do something?
No offense damon but i am pretty sure i have been in 3 winning MW fams, lead a 4th MW winning fam, and won ICPG twice. I mean i could be wrong though.
lol
i think you are wrong acrid its not you who won but your fam around you you where just lucky to be in there ![]()
WARNING.
if my fam gets farmed, i will make it my personal agenda to constantly nuke your empire over and over again repeating, non stop until you have nothing left
then you end up like that guy floresant pink back in 2001 in PW, haha! i nuked his ass till he deleted.
i will, in fact, skip college classes and go out of my way to nuke you. i will even email pictures of nuclear warheads to you. i have no life, all i have is a 30 pack o' keystones and an ounce of weed, i will make you my b***ch
have a nice day lmfao!
BTW, dont take me seriously ![]()
Thanks for the compliment Damon ![]()
We killed off inactives, now new people are taking up our fam spots for 48 hours saying "kill me pls"
3 ★ HEROES ★ (3152) [41,45] 50 79522 3654
Anubis banking ? WTF ? Lost a major attacking contender in that choice but whos to say this fag cant pull off attacking with revalons aswell ? A questionable decision that leads me to the conclusion he has too much faith in his attacking lineup.
They'll have to prove me wrong on this one. Aside from that good econ going and activity not far from splendid.
Too bad their leader likes sparkling men tho..takes away all the HC about them.
Keyplayer : Anubis (if he makes Revalons attack well)
Contenders for 1-3
lol...
i'd like to see the future pvc's
Mizzle I'm going to NAP you, then break NAP and farm you ![]()
> Torqez wrote:
> Acrid won ICPG.
Twice.
Chuck Norris beat Acrid in ICPG... Twice.
and he doesnt even play ICPG
Imperial Forum → Universal News → Pretenders vs Contenders MW new round
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.