Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Universal News → ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 54 ~
> Flash[light]ning wrote:
> but tryme your such a noobie crybaby whiner unskilled lieing noobie(didn't i already say that?) guy who no one can trust
but yanno i still love ya 
*p.s take note of sarcasm
Except everything you said is true.
![Flash[light]ning](https://imperialconflict.com/forum/img/avatars/29283.gif)
knew you would post that serenity, too predictable
Are there still people around who actually do this "Pretenders vs. Contenders" list or has this become another topic where PW people talk to each other about affairs in the galaxy?
> Flash[light]ning wrote:
> knew you would post that serenity, too predictable
I would hope you knew that... Ive stated multiple times that he is a liar... common sense.
> Dr.Hobo [Project-Zero] wrote:
> Are there still people around who actually do this "Pretenders vs. Contenders" list or has this become another topic where PW people talk to each other about affairs in the galaxy?
It basically replaces the "Pinwheel Round __" thread that always went up, pvc is rarely done.
I feared as much. 
> LnSect wrote:
> #3118 just broke the cease fire between #3116 and #3118/#3114 by clearing the closest planets from 3116 to their core.
war is on.
3116 vs 3114/3118
___
13 Attacks from 18 and 16 in 30 Ticks. Which war is on?
all shares are cleared and we dont bother with 3118, we're after 3114
its not like there were so much shares... anyway, time to push them back.
do what you want LnSect, #18 will get you also now
We 're not bohered with 3118. their attacker tried to figrun me and he lost more figs then me, then he did it again and again lols 
they wanted a 2v1 cause they cant handle us alone I guess.
you went for 2vs1 not us
yes I broke the nap/cease-fire.... right...
get ur facts straight. You decided to clear us while we were in cease fire, with the nap almost ready. real honor there.
we even signed the nap in relations page to avoid accidents but still u decided to cancel that nap on relations to clear us.
bad bad boys
> LnSect wrote:
> yes I broke the nap/cease-fire.... right...
get ur facts straight. You decided to clear us while we were in cease fire, with the nap almost ready. real honor there.
we even signed the nap in relations page to avoid accidents but still u decided to cancel that nap on relations to clear us.
bad bad boys
__
It is right and i am in 18.
> LnSect wrote:
> yes I broke the nap/cease-fire.... right...
get ur facts straight. You decided to clear us while we were in cease fire, with the nap almost ready. real honor there.
we even signed the nap in relations page to avoid accidents but still u decided to cancel that nap on relations to clear us.
bad bad boys
Why on earth would you expo in #18's core?
Nice, then we have sorted out who broke what:)
it was around their core and thats pretty normal when you have a nap with core agreement.
and if it would have been in ur core then the planets would get traded out because of the nap with core clause...
but then again IT WAS NOT IN UR CORE.
why would you go for ok lets not say core but shared systems then around our core
lol I have no clue what u mean.
I think ur new to the game right?
its all very clearly explained in the nap proposal I sent. Maybe care enough to read it?
I 'm not gonna post it here as you cant post coordinates.
nap = non aggression pact
means we may not attack eachother. (so exactly the opposite as you did)
btw thanks for your honesty pimpf , much appreciated.
core clauses are used so that in naps that can be terminated (e.g. 48hr or 72hr) it means you have systems that are safe from intrusion from your enemy, if you are in systems that aren't in core clause then its fair game for the other family. you just have to make sure you fill your systems better so they cant explore in them. its a good tactic for if later in the round say for example insect wanted to cancel later on he would have some shares and means he could do more damage.
> LnSect wrote:
> btw thanks for your honesty pimpf , much appreciated.
__
No problem. But we still had no nap but talks about it. And i am not sure how to cancel a CF but yes, in nap talks you dont continue fighting without a prior warning. ON the other hand you had Planets in our core and that is not smart too.
And this is not a war yet more a fight for position
Lnsect your proposal was that your fam's core spread over 50 systems and our alliance's core also 50 planets.
Maybe if it was 16: 25 planet core
14/18: 50 planet core
Would have been much better.
But anyhow congrats on having the upperhand in the war at the moment 
Good luck further
the 50 system core for each side was actually the first thing both parties agreed on, ask ur leader and Ricking , they were there.
that was the main proposal which was agreed on, terms would follow on that. So dunno why u bring that up. And yes we have the upperhand in the war, and that will remain that way
Imperial Forum → Universal News → ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 54 ~
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.