Topic: Droids vs. Soldiers

I'm reading the strat forums for a while now, and people keep saying that if u have points it's best to take droids for a banker. (I have to say it's some pages back)
But from my point of view as it comes to banker defence Soldiers are better then droids. As u read the guide carefully u will see this:

Soldier
Soldiers are needed to conquer planets, but they can only fight on the ground.
Ground attack: 2
Ground defence: 7

Droid
The droid is a fairly recent invention, originally conceived by the Quantams. It is superior to the common soldier in ground combat. 
Ground attack: 7
Ground defence: 4

As u notice the droids has only 4 defence against the 7 of the soldier. As u wont be attack as much as banker anyway and u only will defend then i would defo take soldiers.
Only point u got against them is they use food, but as a pop banker it's almost impossible to take droids if u still want a decent custom race tongue

Maybe they have changed this after people wrote this in forum, or maybe they dont. But any way i'm a right or not? Input plz.

If u spell TRYME in scrabble, u win! Forever!

Re: Droids vs. Soldiers

Soldiers are the way to  go for a banker. However, Just remember that 100k droids are better than 349k soldiers in attack. If you are likely to be doing any attacking... you will need droids.

Re: Droids vs. Soldiers

Ye but i'm looking on this from banker perspectiv.

If u spell TRYME in scrabble, u win! Forever!

Re: Droids vs. Soldiers

You are right, they changed it

Re: Droids vs. Soldiers

The stats have been changed. For a banker now your best choice are soldiers.

Soldiers used to have a defence of 5, which has now been improved to 7.

Destiny is only for those too own to make their fate weak.

~ Geese

Re: Droids vs. Soldiers

The terms 'banker' and 'attacker' are arbitrary: With small family sizes it is vital that every player attacks. I'd rather my 'bankers' had some sort of aggressor feature and reduced another attribute slightly, because I want to maximise 990% (or whatever) of morale, to take the planets efficiently.
Unless playing a standard race, I would say Droids are a must.

Re: Droids vs. Soldiers

i disagree, u better slap your inactive attackers. Bankers dont need droids anymore tongue period.

If u spell TRYME in scrabble, u win! Forever!

Re: Droids vs. Soldiers

You can disagree ... whilst my bankers take your planets.
remember Revalon and Partaxian do not have droids. So in a fam of 12 in MW you are likely to have 3-4 people already with these two races. Your other bankers could be resourcers or Cash, but for a Cf/Pop-switch banker to have droids, it only requires a small decrease in science.

I played banker to an extent this round, with droids and 10% attack. In a big war I was able to annex 75 planets over 2 ticks. My attackers did a fantastic job... but in IC, wars are won through a combination of morale and military strength. If only 5 people in your family attack, and 7 attack in the other family - you will always struggle to win.

Re: Droids vs. Soldiers

bankers should retake, but not raising portal. And then the fact, if your bankers with droids attack me then i should have a lil bit bigger ground then u. U got 100k droids and i got 110k soldiers.. I'll most likely win because me -30 attack in race doesn't count for defence and your +10 attack wont make up for  for the extra 10k i got. And then again all the points u wasted on droids and less research will get your attacker less cash, so my attacker with more cash will easily break your attackers portal and yours smile I'll be quick to take planets of him and he will keep better morale that way.

If u spell TRYME in scrabble, u win! Forever!

Re: Droids vs. Soldiers

I pointed out awhile ago the information concerning Soldiers and Droids.

in a straight up fight, D v S it's a 1 on 1 thing, and it comes down to who has more. However, once attack bonuses come into play, your 7 pt droid becomes 10.5 with 50% and with another 50 from research is 14 and will pwn 3 soldiers before being killed. 3 1/2 actually. so you have 7 soldiers killing and being killed by 2 droids. How's numbers for that?

s v d is 2 v 4, so you have 2 soldiers taking on 1 droid. So most likely you need double the attack force for that of the defending force. that's alot of ground. Now assuming you're a Revalon, -30% of 2 is 1.4 so you suddenly just went from 2 soldiers to 3 soldiers, and your last soldier is hanging by a bare thread when that last droid comes around the corner and taps him killing him but gets some blood on the droid, causing it to rust slightly tongue

in such case you need 3 times the ground the enemy has. More so if they have military research, which is likely. Now you're pretty much screwed unless you have high ground or you don't hit a portal or they stationed. Pray. Hard.

Now the tricky thing next up is that a Rev hitting another Rev portal, 2 against 7. that's what? 1.4 against 7. lets bring about some numbers here, 3 = 4.2 6 = 8.4. so 5 = 7 so you need 5 soldiers to take on 1 enemy soldier. since you have -30% attacking and they have 0% defending. See where I'm going? Yeah, it's a game of numbers more than anything else.

Insane Lemming of Drama Queens and Other Hyperbolical People

1431 ftw

Re: Droids vs. Soldiers

oh and Mace, by the time it matters, most bankers should have about 15-20% nw as ground.

assuming you're 1 mil nw, you have 150k ground. (unless maximizing income, then 100k) They should be able to take on another banker in a war, with support from another attacker. IE, attacker takes out most ground then leaves the banker exposed to the other banker who can then raid him.

Insane Lemming of Drama Queens and Other Hyperbolical People

1431 ftw

Re: Droids vs. Soldiers

i see bankers retakes and maybe take if someone explore in shares if can but head on attacks is not to smart so soldies will be better  and have your attackers and resouses to the rest