Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Politics → Russia re-arming
@esa don't you think some times it get's manipulated? Like after a bombing they start killing people theirselves and put he bodies over the area. Just to get lot's of attention from the media?
LP do you still play or are you just spamming politics? 
> Ruski troop transports = 1 shot, 3000 casualties
3000? :S...Huh???
> The Russians don
@gurn:
It has been many years since I last played. Can't really remember how long. What about you?
the Russians are notorious for their disregard towards casualties, but they longer have a 6 million strong Red Army. They've only got 1.1 million so casualties are more of a concern
Actually their Georgia war used about 4 divisions, 40,000 troops
those amphib assault ships usually hold about 3000 troops. Sink one...
Didn't think they even used amphibious assault ships during that war...
Still playing paul #3035 (white ranger)
they didnt have amphib assault ships in 2008, that's why they bought some
Ah, i'm catching up now 
.
Where's the time we teamed up. Must be 8-10 years or so. It was a nice time in the Fremen fam. Anyways GL Gurn.
Yaki Niku = Captain Stunner in 3018, we're the only ones left
Gurney, man! Gurney, man!
@gurn:
Most of the fremen fam quit the game for another. One or another shooter. Can't really remember. It were nice times, but it took to much of my time.
@chris:
For all clarity, Gurney does not refer to:
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Gurney
but to a character of Dune:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gurney_Halleck
We were a fam ages ago with the fremen theme. My name -contrary to popular believe- does not refer to a body part.
i KNOW that, that's why I quoted Paul when he met Gurney again at the ambush X(
/me hoists a green banner with a concealed waterbottle in the staff and goes rampaging across the universe in a huff
I knew you know, tough I admit I remember the quotes only now. Just joking yell.
too late! I'm on the jihad
/me strums baliset
If I leave here tomorrowwww...
concerning the resources of the world. World screwed up somewhere along the way. Firstly, Earth has finite resources. Say, 1 billion growing at a rate of 50 per tick. We used up around 2k per tick at 1900, 50k per tick by 1950, 750k in 2000 and now 5 mil per tick now in 2010. The population finds ways to increase its advantage over others and in order to do so, they must increase their technologies via some sort of engineering which eventually becomes mass produced. Plastics and metals etc are used in MASSIVE proportions. Not to mention many companies are like, "atmosphere? Global warming? doesn't exist if I can make a huge profit. But maybe we can take a portion of our money and make it seem like we care. Those hippies are ignorant anyways"
Americans. Dumb. Ignorant. Retarded. Dumbasses. Idiots. Conceited.
"WE'RE ALL [moo'ing] RETARDS. WHY? BECAUSE WE'RE ALL HUMAN. NO ONE IS BETTER THAN THE NEXT!!!"
Humans. Dumb. Ignorant. Retarded. Malevolent. Idiots. Conceited.
I'm sure some of you can read between the lines.
oh and for some unknown reason the masses enjoy watching celebrities marital issues. It's like, HOLY SHIT, BRAD AND ANGELINA ARE AT IT AGAIN!!! z0mgz I know!
when they're ignorant to the fact that shit like that happens everyday because our young people (and slightly older folks) are again, retarded. 10 year olds having sex! 12 yr olds gettting pregnant! at the rate we're going, in 2020 9 month babies will be making out with each other in the cribs!
Edit: I want to add to my rant.
WHY THE HELL ARE WE ALLOWING THIS BEHAVIOR TO CONTINUE!? I suggest that because of this the following countries enact these new ideas: United States of America.
Anyone under the age of 21 getting pregnant and/or having an abortion must take the fetus, name it, hold it for 3 days, then bury it.
Anyone under the age of 18 getting pregnant and having a child born MUST EAT THE CHILD! they will be the first to go. then the third child after that. and every other after that.
Lastly, Anyone under the age of 16 having sex shall be taken to the town square, naked, beaten with hickory sticks by the parents of the offender, then flogged before a tribunal, half-drowned, kicked in the nuts (for both men and women) branded with the symbol "A" then spanked a score and thrice to reprimand their actions.
I explain that the second law is such for americans, their way of life is to have sex as much as they want, without consequence. Why? Because americans live for personal pleasure first and for family second. Conceit is borne in the hearts of the wicked, and so, we will root out this evil among us...by eating babies. An additional benefit goes for that we can lose weight! how? Americans are fat. FAT FAT FAT. The culture implies that fatness is bad, but we don't care why? Because we stuff our faces to enjoy the food there. To lose weight, by eating a baby, we will lost our appetite for days to come! It could be a family meal! The mother and father eating their firstborn. Together. How lovely.
Fetuses aborted. Name it something, maybe Sally? After her great grandmother who died last year? Hold the fetus for 3 days, caring for it, carrying it, loving the dead thing in your arms that will never know YOUR love, YOUR warmth or even YOUR personality. Might even have had your eyes. Then bury it. See how many abortions you have after that...whore.
And as for the public flogging, who doesn't enjoy a nude minor getting beaten in the town square for promiscuity? I know I do. Let the heathens die for their decadent pleasures. Or in most cases, be beaten and scarred forever with the brand "A".
though your rant is extreme, i agree with the underlying meaning of it.
there is a "group" of people in america, they do not have a name; we can call then the "typical american". keep in mind, most of us in this forum do not fall in this category because we seem to care about our world in an omniscent sort of view.
this group, we can call "jerry springer generation". Mr Obama won his campaign based on these peoples' votes. the same people that 10years previously, choose not to vote because they had better things to do. these people are intoxicated by FOX news and their amasing capacity to make the most disturbing of stories entertaining. yup, i'm talking about the crackpots that are against socialism because of the status quo, and they dont even know what socialism actually is! avagrado is against socialism because he actually knows what it is. many people, have their minds made up already and they dont even realize they've lost their minds when TV was invented.
so, i have a message to all of the idiot americans that make the rest of us look bad:
"turn off the news, get some exercise, and read goddam book! this way when you conversate you actually know something! avo, i would consider my adversary, i'm a liberal atheist and he is not. it is fun to argue with him because he knows how to debate and he done his research too.
glen beck should be sent to afghanistan, that will wake his ass up.
socialism sucks, it prevents you from outsmarting your neighbor. I don't mean cheating, i mean outsmarting
how can Dominos make it big if their pizza sucks? Ans. It didn't suck, and it was faster than other nonsucky pies
so why say it sucked? because everybody else delivers now
they are just being smarter
/me strums baliset
For I--aiyah!! I am an owl of the desert,
And this bird can never chaaaaange
/me grinds bodacious seven-minute baliset solo
> Anyone under the age of 21 getting pregnant
Wait...what?
The problem isn't people getting pregnant, the problem is people believing
that getting pregnant is evil.
Next you'll be telling me taking a dump is evil too. Should you name, hold,
bury and eat your faeces too?
> socialism sucks, it prevents you from outsmarting your neighbor.
No it doesn't...if anything it prevents your neighbour from becoming so big that
you cannot possibly compete.
Which is why so many 'mom n pop' stores are closing down these days.
Um....on this side of the atlantic socialism means government picks the winners and no mom and pop shall arise to compete
Then you are being tricked by your politicians...
'Most socialists share the view that capitalism unfairly concentrates power and wealth among a small segment of society that controls capital and derives its wealth through exploitation, creates an unequal society, does not provide equal opportunities for everyone to maximise their potential and does not utilise technology and resources to their maximum potential nor in the interests of the public.'
Imperial Forum → Politics → Russia re-arming
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.