Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

I'm not leading because I didn't care about this round.
Thought about deleting and going to cap a few times.

Was pretty fun for me though, did well in a shitty fam.

Next round Id like a more active fam though , I don't know about leading anymore though

302 (edited by Amspir 23-Dec-2009 11:16:04)

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

THE FAMILY NEWS FOR YEAR 19
----------------------------

---------------
Family 2985
---------------
308 successful attacks against 2985.
406 lucky strikes by 2985.

246 planet(s) involved in the raging conflict.
72 of them are currently under our control (67 by retake)
153 of them are occupied by 2985 (92 by retake)
-----------------------------
We are DOWN by 81 planet(s).







not bad for a banker (MW) and myself on retakes 



edit to take out coords tongue

DH (ave/\/\an

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

Family 2986
---------------
191 successful attacks against 2986.
243 lucky strikes by 2986.

170 planet(s) involved in the raging conflict.
32 of them are currently under our control (21 by retake)
134 of them are occupied by 2986 (92 by retake)
-----------------------------
We are DOWN by 102 planet(s).

DH (ave/\/\an

304 (edited by Rainin 23-Dec-2009 11:18:26)

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

lol nvm..

"YOU DARE QUESTION THE WISDOM OF THE WARCHIEF?"

<Parrot> cause i am a massive faggot
<Parrot> and i love the cock

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

Just given an update on the actual in game war and not the flaming (which is also entertaining) tongue

DH (ave/\/\an

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

lol

DH (ave/\/\an

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

----------------
-   CAPTURES   -
----------------
312 planet(s) captured by Like a BOSS (95 %) (158 retakes).
207 planet(s) captured by On a Boat (73 %) (70 retakes).
192 planet(s) captured by White Powder (88 %) (29 retakes).
36 planet(s) captured by Lazy Sunday (97 %) (19 retakes).
1 planet(s) captured by JESNT (100 %) (1 retakes).
-------------------
435 from #2991
310 from #2981
3 from #2986
-------------------
We overwhelmed the enemy 748 times. 3 families and 450 planet(s) involved.
We actually gained 333 planet(s) in total. Unfortunately they managed to retake 117.

----------------
-   BLOW-UPS   -
----------------
46 enemy planet(s) blown up by Like a BOSS
5 enemy planet(s) blown up by On a Boat
5 enemy planet(s) blown up by White Powder
1 enemy planet(s) blown up by Lazy Sunday



Also
---------------
-   DEFEATS   -
---------------
171 planet(s) lost by Like a BOSS
133 planet(s) lost by On a Boat
70 planet(s) lost by White Powder
53 planet(s) lost by Hot Rod
32 planet(s) lost by Lazy Sunday
16 planet(s) lost by Scrooge McDuck
4 planet(s) lost by JESNT
-------------------
340 to #2991
138 to #2981
1 to #2986
-------------------
We have been beaten 479 times. 3 families and 260 planets involved.
We actually lost 138 planet(s) in total. At least we were able to retake 122.

--------------------------
-   SUCCESSFUL DEFENSE   -
--------------------------
57 failed attacks against White Powder (45 %).
43 failed attacks against Like a BOSS (20 %).
31 failed attacks against On a Boat (19 %).
16 failed attacks against Hot Rod (23 %).
15 failed attacks against Lazy Sunday (32 %).
2 failed attacks against Scrooge McDuck (11 %).
1 failed attacks against RainbowNerds (100 %).
1 failed attacks against JESNT (20 %).
-------------------
166 planet(s) defended in total.

"YOU DARE QUESTION THE WISDOM OF THE WARCHIEF?"

<Parrot> cause i am a massive faggot
<Parrot> and i love the cock

308

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

i made like a total of 55 ops so far. all target ops on bankers. wheee.

RETIRED

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

lol at 81/91 infra smile

310 (edited by MeditatE 23-Dec-2009 19:45:16)

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

sure u did mw. ur memory is garbage clearly though, must be all the weed :s since when dun u work for RS? though last time i've played with any of the old guys was when we took the crew to andro. btw good work with the laser trap tongue

dustin i think u would do pretty well as an attacker. ur pretty active big_smile oh and u should own whoever was that attacker that told u he's saving for eor jump instead of attacking. i'd like to see him jump anywhere w/o banker's cash.

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

i know right tongue lol

you dont know me

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

> /Beers wrote:

> Me too Link....You big fat Homo.   Oh and a warm hello to MW, been a long time.


sure has! how u been? still kicking ass? (except for our lil ping pong tongue)

Drunk Dutchie

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

> MeditatE wrote:

> sure u did mw. ur memory is garbage clearly though, must be all the weed :s since when dun u work for RS? though last time i've played with any of the old guys was when we took the crew to andro. btw good work with the laser trap tongue

dustin i think u would do pretty well as an attacker. ur pretty active big_smile oh and u should own whoever was that attacker that told u he's saving for eor jump instead of attacking. i'd like to see him jump anywhere w/o banker's cash.


ah that you RS big_smile You've been impostering me i've heard! tssss tongue
weed is killing the brain though.. miss our old days, was great fun with you big_smile

Drunk Dutchie

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

fear meh!

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

will come play another round after my mcat studies smile

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

@Bullet, As I recall, that whole fiasco led us to a Pnap with your tri before you were too badly raped... tongue The technicality was legit though, I specified in a clause before signing the nap that the leaders who signed the nap must remain leader for the nap to be effective. Nothing special about that, please don't compare apples and oranges... wink

AOD~EOD~TDO~

317

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

darkwill
6/12 estorms
10/16 hypno

darkwing
4/5 estorms
3/4 hypno

fastforward
17/21 OH

pause
10/14 OH

bumblebee
5/5 OH

darksaint
1/1 OH

volume
2/2 OH
Last edited by Poetic Space (Today 20:54:09)

RETIRED

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

Lol doing an OH on a person with 600k income + being a wardancer

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

eor .. everyone is bored

retired.

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

Seems so yes

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

where are u in msn darksaint

retired.

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

> Poetic Space wrote:

> darkwill
6/12 estorms
10/16 hypno

darkwing
4/5 estorms
3/4 hypno

fastforward
17/21 OH

pause
10/14 OH

bumblebee
5/5 OH

darksaint
1/1 OH

volume
2/2 OH
Last edited by Poetic Space (Today 20:54:09)



/proud to be targeted the most with OH's big_smile

Drunk Dutchie

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

> Fallen Angel wrote:

> @Bullet, As I recall, that whole fiasco led us to a Pnap with your tri before you were too badly raped... tongue The technicality was legit though, I specified in a clause before signing the nap that the leaders who signed the nap must remain leader for the nap to be effective. Nothing special about that, please don't compare apples and oranges... wink


not true, we'd been dropped by the fire fam who allied with muffins and someone else, it was us (water) and wind i guess they must have been, you hit us a few days before eor, no time to pnap wink


and hon, you missed a pretty good opportunity with my 40mil pop tongue

although i did get raided at eor by the looks of it sad
didnt get a chance to log in today or yesterday
gutted

<Mizzle> ive been in a jailcel for the first time of my life during this night lol
<Mizzle> new experience big_smile

324

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

well bullet, i got so caught up in darkwill's pop that i missed you. i always thought you were a reso. hahahaha.

RETIRED

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

did you ever get will's pop?
i was amazed everytime i logged in and saw it still there, i was kinda relying on it being zapped so it would boost my con bonus and i could pull a nice big wizzie jump
never happened though
i guess i know why now!

<Mizzle> ive been in a jailcel for the first time of my life during this night lol
<Mizzle> new experience big_smile