Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

> [Pw9]Most Wanted wrote:

> And as FA already clearly stated... it's pritty obvious we got a lot of noobs and aren't organized at all (heck if u noticed our jump alone you'd know this).

So boosting you're ego with all this bragging of i killed x figs and x droids is fine if it makes u feel better. Though don't think it makes u any good smile

~~~~

How am i boosting ego?  Pretty sure the flaming started with your alliance.  I would call this defending my status and skill/honor.  Not trying to boost my ego, but you cant expect me to sit here while you flame me and my family/alliance when theres people you didnt even mention that are better then you both.

"YOU DARE QUESTION THE WISDOM OF THE WARCHIEF?"

<Parrot> cause i am a massive faggot
<Parrot> and i love the cock

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

I think everybody posting here knows what I'm capable of doing. So can we come up with something more original? tongue

228

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

To be honest FA... I'm pretty sure you taught me how to attack like 8 years ago. lols

[22:11]    <Primo>    WHO SAID I AM ACTIVE? X( X(

Is that a NAP I saw you make? Time to break it!

229 (edited by [Pw9]Most Wanted 21-Dec-2009 20:11:14)

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

> Rainin wrote:

> > [Pw9]Most Wanted wrote:

> > Rainin wrote:

> Yeah 82 broke a PNAP. LOL


Lol since when did u guys value naps?


And i find it absolutely hilarious how you would defend someone breaking a PNAP, just because templare attacked same time as us, boohoo 6-7 ticks early, whats the big deal.  You woulda lost this war anyways.

You might of taken more planets from my bankers, and thats about it(short lived victory.)



hahaha lol, i'll remember that boohoo if we ever should have a nap and i attack 7 ticks early wink

And I'm not saying we'd win otherwise... Altough some things might have gone differently.
I find it absolutely hilarious that you complain about a pnap being broken while you're allies break on us. 48h nap/PNAP whatever... Naps are naps and aren't supposed to be broken. Period.

Drunk Dutchie

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

actually NAPs can be broken as it is an agreement tongue We're more surprised than anything at 82 breaking PNAP tongue

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

and on the whole laser trap thing

clearly if u know it's a laser trap, it has no use anymore and it has failed.. so your comment: "i knew you'd lose enough lasers to make it worth it" is stupid

still funny you attacked and failed anywayz tongue (and yeah i know u got zillions to rebuild) it remains funny big_smile

Drunk Dutchie

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

I'm glad everything's funny now and nobody's upset. smile

233

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

w/e. this war sucks. i expected much more boomz

RETIRED

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

> [Pw9]Most Wanted wrote:

> > Rainin wrote:

> > [Pw9]Most Wanted wrote:

> > Rainin wrote:

> Yeah 82 broke a PNAP. LOL


Lol since when did u guys value naps?


And i find it absolutely hilarious how you would defend someone breaking a PNAP, just because templare attacked same time as us, boohoo 6-7 ticks early, whats the big deal.  You woulda lost this war anyways.

You might of taken more planets from my bankers, and thats about it(short lived victory.)



hahaha lol, i'll remember that boohoo if we ever should have a nap and i attack 7 ticks early wink

And I'm not saying we'd win otherwise... Altough some things might have gone differently.
I find it absolutely hilarious that you complain about a pnap being broken while you're allies break on us. 48h nap/PNAP whatever... Naps are naps and aren't supposed to be broken. Period.


I didnt even complain i said LOL... learn the english language jesus

"YOU DARE QUESTION THE WISDOM OF THE WARCHIEF?"

<Parrot> cause i am a massive faggot
<Parrot> and i love the cock

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

How the fudgeknuckle has 82 broken any PNAPs?

I am sKoE
Do you know what the chain of command is here? It's the chain I go get and beat you with to show you who's in command.

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

the way i saw it was 82 had an option to do w/e they liked.

unless you guys signed pnap afterwards?

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

we did/still do had/have the option to do w/e we liked/like... chose not to interfere with 81/91 because they were honorable enough to not interfere with us although, technically, our NAP is no longer in place

i decided to make a point to 86/templare that next time he should think twice about dicking over his allies -- esp when they had helped him into the position they currently are in...

i could do more damage if i wanted but that wasnt the reasoning in the first place... point made... done with ops

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

Nice Awexome

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

Templare said 82 was PNAP'd to 86.. and i KNOW 85 is PNAP'd to 82 tongue i dunno just going by what i heard awexxome.

"YOU DARE QUESTION THE WISDOM OF THE WARCHIEF?"

<Parrot> cause i am a massive faggot
<Parrot> and i love the cock

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

yes, 82 is PNAPPED with 85 -- that has not and will not change

I have never seen anything regarding 86 being NAPd of any sort to 82, much the contrary all I see is drabble and bullshit and asshole maneuvers by their leader

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

Victorian Elites explicitly asked whether or not we have a PNAP and I responded yes. I explicitly posted in your forum that we have a PNAP after we remove alliance, before it happened. Awexxome choose to blatantly disregard that.

As I explained to Redlink, the reason I choose not to drag 82 into this war is because they are incapable of fighting in the state at the time, and had the most to lose. Ask your fam Awexxome, who all wanted to fight? (or even better, how many players will even provide a timely response?) I'm not questioning your fam's capabilities, I say this because your fam has been inactive most of the round and has 6th or 7th best infra in the galaxy as a result of that. I cancelled without consoling VE, back to the argument of inactivity, because I can't find anybody from your family online in the matter of 5 ticks (because I had planned on cancelling 2 ticks after, not 7 ticks after).

You took it upon yourself to "teach me a lesson" about being an asshole? Look at the map Awexxome, if I'm not spread all over your cores covering your asses the entire round, who knew what would have happened.

242 (edited by Suspicious Whisperer 21-Dec-2009 22:04:48)

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

oh while we're at it Awexxome, who helped your family sort out your foreign relations when you were away? Who helped your fam clear intruders because *all* of your attackers were busy IRL? more importantly, what have YOU done this round that gives you the right to prove a point to me?

243 (edited by Fallen Angel 21-Dec-2009 22:12:25)

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

LMAO @ Rainin, You fell right into it like silly Render did...lol, taking meaningless flames personally, (which really, look at what you responded with)... As far as Templare and Assassin go, yes they are good... but I've known them for MANY rounds, not just 4-5... I draw my opinion of good/great from consistent results and having previously fought their alliances and won(plus previously being in the same fam and allies with them)...long before you stepped into the ring my friend... wink I have no question of the fact that you're a "good" attacker Rainin, I'm simply saying that as one who has beaten and taught the likes of Kagar a thing or two on attacking before, you'd be wise to realize that coming back from "vacation" is simply like stretching my legs...  I will not brag about specific accomplishments, etc,etc, as we are after all in PW atm, but I will let my "semi-active" play speak for itself next round should I choose to stay...  I was late into the 81 by over 2 weeks... that's quite a bit in a 6 week round... yes, I resourced mainly because I wasn't sure of my activity level around the holidays,etc.   You have no idea who I am or what I'm capable of, tbh, Templare basically only ever played with me when I was what I define as "semi-active" at best...  I have already reiterated many times that 81 was not a #1 fam, even now going as far as to say that yes of course, 86 and 85 were better, even on their own, lol, that is not in question... What is in question though is whether you actually think I was trying lol? With 3 weeks here, and minimal activity, I managed to get to a "measly" 600K figs and over a half mill ground... nothing special really, but without much help from my family after i got a bit of res prod up, not bad for a rusty vet, (oh and that means that I HAD fleet nooblar, last time I checked 600K anything was considered fleet)...:P If you want, we can try discussing a previous round when I was here since BOR in my usual "sexeh fams"... where a pitiful 2 mill figs would be chump fleet and I would have still beat you even if we were 2 mill/each(try to figure that one out)... but this is all woulda, coulda, shoulda, blah, blah, blah, my point this round was just to get back into my "groove", so watch out next round, I might be active... I did not underestimate anyone, in fact I never estimated at all???  I even said fighting 85 alone was not a good idea(because I knew your infra, especially cash infra, was far superior), but my fam doesn't listen to anyone anyways, so whats it matter... I did a mild jump(because our crappy family didn't get their shit together) hoping maybe you wouldn't jump as big as you did(but it was obvious since you're main attacker) and therefore maybe you might get annoyed losing too much while attacking, and then realize I wasn't even attacking back(for obvious reasons)...but clearly not... Just maybe I could sit there and do nothing until EOR since my fam is useless(minus Dark Saint, Motion and VC), but no, you had to go and ruin my semi-activeness...X( Not to worry, you're on my "fluffy bunny" list now anyways for being such a w@nker about it... I'm just surprised that you keep responding to my posts, which is funny because I even state that at the end of my posts and you still respond with some preconceived notion that I actually give a $h!t about how good you think you are? Difference being I know how good I am, its whether I choose to be active or not, which this round was a bust anyways due to some obvious reasons.  tongue Oh and go ahead, LOL, take all my planets if you want, it will not prove a thing, besides how much of a tool you really are... wink  (I promise, I will take the "tool" back if you can prove to me that you're not as childish as Render's posts)... wink

**Waits with a stick to poke noobeh Rainin again**  Oh and 30K bombers is not that much nOOb! ...and you call yourself an attacker... wink

AOD~EOD~TDO~

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH   <===== DUMBASS TOOK THE TIME TO READ fa POSTS I MISS THEM

draculas> my daughter just made cheerleading squad
Squeaky> ...is she hot?
draculas> shes 12 sicko
Squeaky> oh damn

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

You're saying you dont care much then you flame me..

I didnt say you were a bad attacker, i even stated i heard you were good.  I wasnt claiming i beat you fair and square.. i was mostly dissing your family for such a shitty jump.

It wasnt fair at all.. and that was exactly my point.. i had 2 mil figs so running everyone in your entire families figs was all too easy, even a noob could do that.  Im not claiming im good because i outfleeted your entire alliance.. dont get confused.  I think I am good because of past outnumbered/outfleeted situations and being able to pull out of them for the win.

"YOU DARE QUESTION THE WISDOM OF THE WARCHIEF?"

<Parrot> cause i am a massive faggot
<Parrot> and i love the cock

246

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

> The Assassin wrote:

> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH   <===== DUMBASS TOOK THE TIME TO READ fa POSTS I MISS THEM

I agree...

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

lols, i love FA's epic posts

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

I cba to read any of this, it's not worth it

On another note, I do enjoy the irony of Serenity and Rain being allied, after all the hate between them last round/start of this one smile

<Mizzle> ive been in a jailcel for the first time of my life during this night lol
<Mizzle> new experience big_smile

249 (edited by Fallen Angel 21-Dec-2009 23:55:12)

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

@ Rainin, Fair enough, I accept your apology! Lets move on to next round! big_smile Oh and I don't care at all, but your responses amuse me!

(oh my, a one liner from FA, scary!)

AOD~EOD~TDO~

Re: 85/86 vs 81/91

LOL... i've been missin out on all this??? i might stop next round afterall!!!

This here is what you call domination,
it's a combination of skill and concentration!!
PW: 2010-02-14 Size rank 123 -- 2010-02-14 Networth rank 13
PW: 2009-12-26 Size rank 40  -- 2009-12-26 Networth rank 5 
PW: 2009-11-04 Size rank 49  -- 2009-11-04 Networth rank 33