don't make me come back and whip your ass temp and this thread is more active than IC. daaaaaamn!

hey i'm just a banker delivering cash as asked.. not like i got an opinion or anything

lols

It's kinda funny that Rain and Rainin are in the same fam and are the main attackers. I chuckle often about it over glasses of quality Scotch and smells of my Mahogany Book shelves.

Oh, which scotch?  I'm quite partial to the 16 year old Lagavulin myself.  And the 10 year old Laphroaig.

What would be funny is if I hadn't joined over 2 weeks after BOR and been only semi-active... (I came after the whole BOR issue with 85), If I was leading, there might have been a difference, maybe not... to be honest, (and I'm not defending anyone) I'm just presenting a fresh perspective... Render did what he could with the means he had. Our fam did not exactly have cooperative bankers... Plagued with inactivity and/or noobishness, many of 81s bankers were too slow or greedy to realize that they would be their fam's own downfall in the end. The only decent banker was Dark Saint(vet), who would have been ideal to go as full banker, but instead, he was an attacker that switched to a banker (as wardancer), lol, and did absolutely amazing..... So my point? If I would have been there in the first two weeks of BOR to make things right and to prevent 85 from getting a leg up, none of this would have happened... END OF STORY!

(Oh also, one of 81s main bankers never showed up...and when he did it was too late and the git hardly saved anything at all, LMAO)

Might I also add that just from experience...(for reference I am not defending 2VS1 or any nap related issues, just voicing a concern over a touchy topic). When one does not include a clause noting that changing of allies will result in a nap being void, said "void clause" does NOT just materialize out of thin air because you say so...meaning naturally the nap terms would stick with said fams (allies or not) until cancellation had ended, so lesson to learn, everyone get me to write your naps for you... enough said!   Yes, 2 VS 1 is not the ideal situation of course, but on the same note, its not 81/91s fault that 85 chose to piss off Render at BOR(so I heard) and then maintain lower ranked allies... all while not upping any 48hr nap to a pnap if there was a concern of mass EOR war... so...

Haven't seen FA post like that in awhile, nice to see you back

~ Cloud

FA, either way your alliance was screwed.  If i hadnt allied with templare 86/82 would of came after you anyways at the same time, because its EoR and theres no other time for it and templare isnt going to let you win by beating my fam down 2v1... it woulda been 3v2 and you woulda lost.. i woulda ran all your attackers by myself and sure we mighta lost more planets but you would still lose round and templare's family would probably still win.

Which is better? a 2v2 fair fight or a 3v2 in essence even though i wouldnt be working with 86/82 we would of been PNAP'd so it woulda hurt you just as bad.

You guys lost because you werent prepared well enough, period.  I could understand you blaming templare joining us same tick if you guys had made any effort to jump a decent fleet.. but as it stood i would of ran render/machine/you all by myself easily with the fleet i had... yawn... dont underestimate people...

Seems we overestimated you.. which i told templare i had a feeling we would.. rofl

THE FAMILY NEWS FOR YEAR 19
----------------------------

---------------
Family 2981
---------------
122 successful attacks against 2981.
0 lucky strikes by 2981.

122 planet(s) involved in the raging conflict.
122 of them are currently under our control
0 of them are occupied by 2981
-----------------------------
We are UP by 122 planet(s).

---------------
Family 2991
---------------
44 successful attacks against 2991.
46 lucky strikes by 2991.

71 planet(s) involved in the raging conflict.
41 of them are currently under our control (16 by retake)
30 of them are occupied by 2991 (3 by retake)
-----------------------------
We are UP by 11 planet(s).

I was in the proccess before orc wonder ran my fleet first tick X(

oh dear...

@ anyone who is asking what the mods are going to do and if templare should be blocked... mods do nothing about nap breaks because naps are nothing to do with them... naps are player orientated, created by players and sometimes policed by players... you can break any nap you like and mods wont do anything... you can even rape your ally and not get in trouble... so stop whining to the mods

anyway, it was an alliance nap and only needs to be honored by the alliance, once that alliance doesnt exist, neither does the nap... templare is right in saying the nap could be voided, but he went about it in a very low, dishonorable way... no, he did not cheat, but he did stoop very low and i bet it will leave a lasting impression

there is nothing wrong with a 2v1 war unless it is 2 big fams farming a small one... two top allies killing one fam in another top alliance is good strategy and the fam on the receiving end shouldnt be dumb enough to be in that position

so, its kinda like everything was done right but wrong at the same time

> Rainin wrote:

> FA, either way your alliance was screwed.  If i hadnt allied with templare 86/82 would of came after you anyways at the same time, because its EoR and theres no other time for it and templare isnt going to let you win by beating my fam down 2v1... it woulda been 3v2 and you woulda lost.. i woulda ran all your attackers by myself and sure we mighta lost more planets but you would still lose round and templare's family would probably still win.

Which is better? a 2v2 fair fight or a 3v2 in essence even though i wouldnt be working with 86/82 we would of been PNAP'd so it woulda hurt you just as bad.

You guys lost because you werent prepared well enough, period.  I could understand you blaming templare joining us same tick if you guys had made any effort to jump a decent fleet.. but as it stood i would of ran render/machine/you all by myself easily with the fleet i had... yawn... dont underestimate people...

Seems we overestimated you.. which i told templare i had a feeling we would.. rofl

Rainin you're kinda weird..

First off u go moaning about this being 2v1. Than when temp nap breaks on us and turns the tables around you go like: "We PWN YOUR ASSES 2v1 anyday.." kinda easy saying that after what has happened no?

Than in this post u state again we'd beat ur ass 2v1 but shortly after u say the opposit.. make up you're mind will ya?

And if you are so sure off beating us 2v1, why let 86 nap break? take us on first 7 ticks and than let 86 join.. all big mouthing now when u have showed 0 skill yet. All u've done is taking candy from a baby with a knife in it's back;)

That was your fleet?  I was the only guy in range who could touch you.