No Mercy For The Merciless! 81/91 Shall Be Beaten To The Ground!

> Suspicious Whisperer wrote:

> MW, you guys wanted an unfair advantage and we actually got an unfair advantage, let's call it even eh?

Meh I admit it was a 2v1 but they knew it was coming for ages.. and the fact that we only have 1 attacker active makes it easier on them. As seen in our ops they already ahd a nice amount saved before we cancelled, and as clearly seen now, they jumped big

I was also expecting u guys to cancell on us (was obvious). Now as i'm just lazy banking this round. I hadn't noticed u guys are in our core (which to nap agreements u shouldn't be at all). But yeah fair game if we don't mention it to u guys...

I dun care to much, i just hate it when people try to make things up to justify their actions..

i'm sorry, plz don't go all tae kwon do on my ass

> Render wrote:

> Rainin we were in the perfect timing to do that, we didnt cheated to do that, we fought for spots to your fam during all the round to do that, it was 2vs1, you realise you will be defeated and ask Templare to cheat????

You are a forever loser

I didnt ask Templare to cheat.  Furthermore Templare didnt cheat.  I told templare i would 1v2 you if i had to.

2vs1 is perfectly fine in my opinion. It's an alliance game and I like to think of the ally as an extended part of my fam where we do things together. It's unfortunate you changed allies and made things messy again Silvarian. It would've been so much better if you could've said your fam beat Render's allliance singlehandedly.

Maybe you should unally and kill Templare.

Anyway, this round it seems like both in Capri and PW a lot of families are breaking NAPs. It pisses me off reading these even though I'm just a spectator haha. I'm not good at putting up with NAP breaks. Render and CO instead of fighting a war that's been tainted, if it's going to give you guys more frustration and stress, I say screw IC and just delete and enjoy the freedom of not having to log on.

Seriously, consider it

rainin i think your pethetic,

on your little quote thingy you have to let everyone know some girl let you shoot ya muck in her mouth??? thats pethetic, even more pethetic you had to clean for the pleasure????

SHIT! templares mam lets you do it for a bag of crisps!!

loop hole? I have failed to see one.  We had a 48 NAP with 82/86 it was canceled while you where STILL allies. 7 ticks prior to our  The ending of our NAP WITH 85/76

> Suspicious Whisperer wrote:

> the loophole is:

82/86 collectively cancelled the NAP. then 86 joined another alliance, thus causing the NAP to be void because 86/82 are no longer acting collectively

collectively or not collectivily you broke a NAP. word

and you are collectively coward to fight us the correct way

Meh we all know it's breaking the nap Temp no point in trying to defend it with some absurd loophole

i'm just dissapointed really.. this could have been a real great fun eor war. 85 clearly had the fleet to hold out for 7 ticks untill 86 joined in. so why [] it up like this?

myeah round is over anywayz

you guys trying to justify a napbreak are pathetic, the loophole is in your brain

I don't think you get the fact that either of our fams could have 1v1ed you guys

should of proved it in the first place then