Re: 85/86 vs 81/91
lols. Templare is HITLER... GHANDI KILLER!
YOU IT ALL PEOPLE NOT WHITE!!!
F8CKING NUB!
III HAAATE TEMPLAREEEEEEEEE
Is that a NAP I saw you make? Time to break it!
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Universal News → 85/86 vs 81/91
lols. Templare is HITLER... GHANDI KILLER!
YOU IT ALL PEOPLE NOT WHITE!!!
F8CKING NUB!
III HAAATE TEMPLAREEEEEEEEE
You're indeed pritty retarded in the head if thats what you're trying to say...
and temp.. You're not even giving me the pleasure of posting it
still uni posting or not, it's really nooby to keep them stationed
Banker pwnage for the win!
I admit I'm pretty n00beh ![]()
what's more funny is that I retook all those planets except your portal(o.O?), and if you didn't have your portal, you wouldn't've known ![]()
> Torqez wrote:
> rofl
What is causing you laugh Torqez? Templare cheating is fun isnt' it?
And you allowing it is a signal of how IC is dying ![]()
God Render you're so annoyingly stupid. Get off your high horse and eat my boot.
YOU
GOT
RAPED
SON!
LOLOLOLOLOL
Yes Yes I Will Get Off Your Mum Tho She's Beggin Me To Continue
> Suspicious Whisperer wrote:
> I admit I'm pretty n00beh ![]()
what's more funny is that I retook all those planets except your portal(o.O?), and if you didn't have your portal, you wouldn't've known ![]()
Lol even more noobeh Temp, thats called skill..
not that you'd know what that word means ![]()
Few things to think about
Without thinking about naps etc - on a pure numbers basis; Which of these scenarios seem fair?
a) (#1 nw and #2 nw) vs. (#3 nw and #13nw)
b) (#1 nw and #2 nw) vs. (#3 nw)
c) (#1 nw and #2 nw) vs. (#3 nw and #4 nw)
a) and b) were what 81/91 wanted - they got pissed because "due to a technicality" #3 and #4 were just a bit smarter
If was a smart move for 81/91 to try a) and then even b) but of course there's always someone thinking just a little bit more
This is a strategy game - you gotta cover all your bases - expect the unexpected; basically 81/91 are claiming "fairness" and "honour" while if you look at the initial scenario ... it is quite the opposite - you can't have it both ways - SORRY!
81 should have solo'd 85 if they had the balls but nooooooooooooo
Who Are You And Who Asked You About It?? Go Die And Put Your Crown Right Straight Into Your Ass
ahahahaha Render's stupidity is amazing.. this thread is becoming more epic by the hour!
Render you are not funny. Seriously, stop trying =p
Yes nolio, his jokes are indeed not funny... but his stupid comments are all kinds of funny. Please dont deter him!
> Nolio wrote:
> Render you are not funny. Seriously, stop trying =p
RETARD I AM NOT TRYING TO BE FUNNY, DONT YOU GET IT????
Nope not really. All I know is that you need to go find a local cocaine salesmen and see if you can get something to help with that unfunny rage.
Kinda true
but u're not doing a better job though Rainin ![]()
And i think most people support you're point King, the thing is a nap was broken.. which can't be justified by something like this
Cancelling a nap on 85 for a EOR war is called STRATEGY
Breaking a nap like 86 did on us is called CHEATING
right??
The Only Loophole I Know Is One Dark And Dirty Somewhere In Templare Mother's Body
MW, you guys wanted an unfair advantage
and we actually got an unfair advantage, let's call it even eh? ![]()
So finding a loophole isn't strategy? In a real life scenario - are finding loopholes in contracts illegal? Lawyers do it everyday!
> ~Serenity~ wrote:
> NAP wasnt broken. You guys just allowed a loophole to be used and NAP was voided.
Thats Bullshit and you know it serenity
fact remains it was broken..
As stated it could have been a nice 2v2.. why break nap and ruin it? no fun in that for anyone..
In a real life scenario there are no naps to break, I can kill you at anytime
Imperial Forum → Universal News → 85/86 vs 81/91
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.