Re: 85/86 vs 81/91
Templare that's just plain b*llsh*t
(sorry for the language)
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Universal News → 85/86 vs 81/91
Templare that's just plain b*llsh*t
(sorry for the language)
render it was an alliance nap and 86/85 were ally's and when you canceled on 85 you canceled on 86
I stand to lose every share i have because of 86 running my fleet and breaking ports before i really jumped. Had i known you guys where going to BREAK our NAP I would have jumped fleet at tick. I was in the middle of raping 85's bankers and they couldn't do shit about it until orc wonderdog stepped in. What ever though. It's just a game and some people gotta weasel there way into a win. I'm not really worried about it.
Week 0, 19
hey atleast lots of people are talking about you. sure cool to be you
I also think templare needs castrating so that he cannot propogate his genes and further undermine the gene pool
darwin award candidate
Signed, FF of Fast Forward (2991)
jokes ![]()
> The Assassin wrote:
> render it was an alliance nap and 86/85 were ally's and when you canceled on 85 you canceled on 86
NO WAY, DONT LIE trying to justify this napbreak 86 is the same fam that cancelled on us and told us attacks will start on week 6, year 19 It doesnt matter they ally your fam, they are the same fam, nothing's changed.
At least Templare reckon you are a coward, dont try to justify yourself, you are looking pathetic
> The Assassin wrote:
> render it was an alliance nap and 86/85 were ally's and when you canceled on 85 you canceled on 86
thats bull shit you guys where not allies until yesterday. We canceled ON 85/76
??? why would i need to build trannies in time with a jump i didn't have?
you're gonna jump eventually right? and when you do that you don't plan on having trannies? ![]()
Render dont loke you time on that maggots templar and Rainin... it is not worth to use up the keyon on the keybord on them.
They can only win in one way... cheating. Thats all.
It is really not worth it, trust me. Anything you say to them wont matter coz they are so stupid that they dont care.
seriously you guys need to take a chill pill
this is just a game. not your life. dont take these too seriously. im not saying who is right who is wrong. i dont care. it doesnt matter if i lose all my planets or my account. they are worthless in RL, and only exists in virtual world.
as a general comment you need to know when to get away from all these online virtual life when you realise it is affecting the way you lead your life.
What has this to do with this game templare? I'm sure that everyone who plays IC knows that rl is more important but some people like to escape for even a few min every now and then. Then you come across players like you and all the fun is gone out of the game
You're talking all this shit when it was 2v2... you wanted 2v1 against my family and you still call us cheaters? you're retarded...
oh the lovely flaming..
I want to see you guys jump some fleet and do something.. you're all pathetic. BRING IT!! I WANT A FIGHT
2v1 is not cheating first off.. And im not bitchting about fighting 2v2. I planned my jump in accordance with 86 joining in on the war.
This 'War?' is over. I stop posting here.
but...where are the mods? they allow this BS happens and the good players (LIKE ME) quit the game while the dirty scum (LIKE TEMPLARE) are staying.
The End
Rainin, all you say is 2v1 WAAAAAAA means nap break is fine WAAAAAA
To take you're style of conversation ![]()
Btw 81 is still at war with 78 so we cant even declare.. real cool. Learn to settle these things before you cancel NAP ...
I stated it was 2v2, and that we were both attacking same tick in one of my posts.. you guys should know better.
And 81, your warblocking is cheating. Planning to take advantage of your attacker number advantage on top of the 2v1 you planned to have against my family? lol... you talk about honor when you do stuff like this.. its great
Whiney Bitches.
Imperial Forum → Universal News → 85/86 vs 81/91
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.