Just using an example here..

family 3054 in andro has been first by networth and size by a long shot for around 7 days now.. They were never below third place after the first day and were switching between first second and third for a week before becoming dominant leaders.. How is it that they have been first for half the round and top three for pretty much the whole round and yet are second...

Score is calculated on a player by player basis.. i dont understand how this is supposed to work, surely this then gives less score to families with less players?

3054 only had 8 players at bor, 4 of which were inactive and were removed from the game via the script after around 3-4 days into the round.. when we lost these four players they lost MASS amounts of score.. how is it fair? the family lost half thier family and yet were top 3..

I believe we need to take a look into score and implement a more fair way of calculating who the 'best' family that round was..