on second thoughts.. im doing some thinking and calcs.. will post something on strategy in its own forum.. its going to be trying to prove the uselessness of to's...

/me dies of shock

since when humi? i thought you only loved gay sex

cf/to ftw!

still waiting for your calculations. lol

nice try humi. but i think it is gonna be hard proving it though.

If all you are interested in is making cash, then 75:25 TO:CF I believe produces the most amount of cash. 

If you want to take market forces, OB, construction science and so forth into consideration in order to work out the most cost efficient way of banking, then you'll be here for a very, very long time doing calculations.    

I once tried to do it, but the equations end up being long and you still have to make assumptions.  In the end I decided life was too short.

Revalon is better.
In this document I've described how you can calculate your optimal CF/TO/RC ratio.

http://freepdfhosting.com/e57c40c6b3.pdf

You can calculate the income bonus you get from using the optimal CF/TO/RC ratio.
For example using a NWgrowth of 1%/tick and an NW to buildings ratio of 8:
revalon will get a 1.26 bonus and the custom race 1.30
But when you multiply these by their race income bonusses revalon has a bonus of 2.016 compared to 1.95 of the custom race. So the extra economy research bonus does not compensate for the 10% loss of income.

It is indeed a static model and since building research centers all the way til the end of the round is not a good idea this is not the fastest way to grow. That beeing said it was my not my intent to find the best possible  building schedule.
I just introduced a better alternative for the 75% CF /25% TO or any CF/RC variant for bankers who like sticking to a constant building ratio.
Where in the document did I conclude that any optimal solution could have more than 25% TO? If you look at the graph you'll see that nowhere it is above 25%.

Humidity you need to recalculate RC's.

You see if your actively growing your science keeps getting knocked down....

If your stopped then yes the points accumulate.

The best 'window' I came up with was to assume 5 days of point generation at 2.5 times (for growth) the total points (added RC's after all) but something like 8 times the original NW...

Lets see I made a basic conclusion that it was easy to double a families NW every 24 hours if run correctly, regardless of build space, regardless of exploration costs and such, if you followed a simple model... So 8 times... that must be the figure indeed since RC's will go up, and their addition must be accounted for. Or it's something close...

Anyways you need to firm that portion up. You do not have instant science, there is build time plus generation time, and thats the kicker.