• Posts: 483
  • Tag points: 8

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 53 ~

he is

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 4,145
  • Tag points: 4

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 53 ~

playing with my name X(

More -=Retired=- then the other bitches tongue

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 720

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 53 ~

Ricking for your information... Rainin is not Rain

The Great Chupacubra has spoken!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

454 Reply by Render

  • Render
  • Guest
  • Tag points: 76

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 53 ~

lol Ricking

a statement repeated many times becomes the truth

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

455 Reply by Hon

  • Hon
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 0

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 53 ~

who is sylva? lol

RETIRED

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

456 Reply by Ouro

  • Ouro
  • Ouro
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1,184
  • Tag points: 50

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 53 ~

a statement repeated many times becomes annoying and moronic.

> Justinian I wrote:
> Ouro,
Even though you were the first one to arrive at the scene who clearly pwned Einstein and showed how biased he is, you are an outright arsehole.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,821
  • Tag points: 8

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 53 ~

anything stated by ouro.... any amount of times... is annoying and moronic big_smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

458 Reply by Ouro

  • Ouro
  • Ouro
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1,184
  • Tag points: 50

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 53 ~

Read: i desperately want to make manlove to ouro and try as i might, he just wont fall for my charms.

keep up the good work ol buddy smile

> Justinian I wrote:
> Ouro,
Even though you were the first one to arrive at the scene who clearly pwned Einstein and showed how biased he is, you are an outright arsehole.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 0

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 53 ~

so I conclude from this discussion that Rain is gay?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

460 Reply by Ouro

  • Ouro
  • Ouro
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1,184
  • Tag points: 50

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 53 ~

nah, i think he's posted about 50000 videos of him bangin chicks out on redtube.
he gets the straight stamp

> Justinian I wrote:
> Ouro,
Even though you were the first one to arrive at the scene who clearly pwned Einstein and showed how biased he is, you are an outright arsehole.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

461 Reply by Rain

  • Rain
  • Rain
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 2,035
  • Tag points: 8

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 53 ~

Oh ya... I do awful, unspeakable things to woman on that site tongue

[22:11]    <Primo>    WHO SAID I AM ACTIVE? X( X(

Is that a NAP I saw you make? Time to break it!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 483
  • Tag points: 8

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 53 ~

meh
I think I gonna write a PvC on of these days.

perhaps.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 11,986
  • Tag points: 10

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 53 ~

meh, im not lol

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 79

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 53 ~

ricking.. "who am i" is tryme, not most wanted!

retired.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,786

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 53 ~

most wanted is most wanted!

going back to the NAP/CF discussion. if you're in any form of nap negotiations, a CF should be mandatory. and you shouldn't just rescind this and start attacking just like that. if you don't want a nap, just say so, dont use it as cover to plan something. what rainin did was inexcusable.

<Mizzle> ive been in a jailcel for the first time of my life during this night lol
<Mizzle> new experience big_smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 642

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 53 ~

> a CF should be mandatory

No it shouldn't. Thats absurd. Any fam could then use the 'mandatory' CF
to portal in or around your core.

A cease-fire is just a pre-cancelled NAP. Its upto both families to agree to
have one.


An example:
If we agree to a 72-hour cease fire, that means that we agree not to attack
each other until that 72-hour period has ended. This is EXACTLY how a NAP
works, except that with a NAP the count-down hasn't begun yet (it has to be
cancelled explicitly).

I am sKoE
Do you know what the chain of command is here? It's the chain I go get and beat you with to show you who's in command.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 642

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 53 ~

And FYI: There is no rules in this game that you:

A) MUST create a cease fire
B) MUST NOT break a cease fire
C) MUST NOT break a NAP


Creating an agreement with another player also creates an assumption of
trust between those two players (or groups of players). There is NO RULE
AGAINST BREAKING A NAP.


So whining about mandatory cease fires is redundant and childish.

I am sKoE
Do you know what the chain of command is here? It's the chain I go get and beat you with to show you who's in command.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,786

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 53 ~

I know that there are no strict rules about that, but there are unspoken rules. Maybe I have stronger morales than most, but the way I see it, if you're negotiating NAP terms, you shouldn't make attacks during said period. Maybe you agree on a specific timeframe for this, maybe not. Obviously doing so is the more sensible option, but to carry on attacking just seems wrong to me.
The way you've put it, about there not being any rules - there's a difference in what's 'legal' and what's 'socially-acceptable', even in IC.
Just because you're going to buy a bag of crisps doesn't necessarily mean you should walk round the shop eating them before you've paid for them. I know some people do, but I would think the vast majority of people would wait till afterwards...
Sorry, this is a pretty poor example, but I'm tired and I want to go to bed, just thought I'd try and from some sort of reply before I went wink

<Mizzle> ive been in a jailcel for the first time of my life during this night lol
<Mizzle> new experience big_smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 4,145
  • Tag points: 4

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 53 ~

damn.... way too many text again...... X(

More -=Retired=- then the other bitches tongue

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,786

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 53 ~

sorry yikes

<Mizzle> ive been in a jailcel for the first time of my life during this night lol
<Mizzle> new experience big_smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

471 Reply by Render

  • Render
  • Guest
  • Tag points: 76

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 53 ~

Week 17, 3        In the name of family cooperation Dark Render has sent a shipment of 15000 crisps to Bullet

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 642

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 53 ~

Sorry Bullet, but this is a war game. Not
a game of economy. Your analogy doesnt
hold.

Cease fire talks are talks during a cease fire.
If no cease fire, then such talk is just talk.



There are no such unspoken rules and you don't
have stronger morales.

I am sKoE
Do you know what the chain of command is here? It's the chain I go get and beat you with to show you who's in command.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,821
  • Tag points: 8

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 53 ~

It's true.... as morbo said... everyone's morales are equal... otherwise some of those blue cross planets would have higher %'s than the others wink

0 Dislike 0 Post Points