201

Re: War 2477/2469 Vs 2472/2466

it's good in a way. saves us the trouble of retaking and nobody wins big_smile except 79 which i don't mind at all

Re: War 2477/2469 Vs 2472/2466

lol yer indeed, still pretty poor war from 72/66 tho imo, yer they got the better of our inactive allies somwhat but i was expecting them to push us a little harder considering there sneaky allies switch and the fact that they cancelled on us but ah well been bored of this loser war for ages but i guess they feel good about it lols cos its still going on big_smile roll on eor

Re: War 2477/2469 Vs 2472/2466

smoke, we're not vulturing, we're utilising our freedom of exploration, protected by both our naps and the 35% rule tongue

anyway, which is worse, the 'vulturing' or farming? wink

<Mizzle> ive been in a jailcel for the first time of my life during this night lol
<Mizzle> new experience big_smile

204

Re: War 2477/2469 Vs 2472/2466

i'd say smoke's word choice was bad for that. 'vulturing' if it means expoing popped planets = fine. vulturing = worst. farming = sucky

well smoke, at least when everyone goes inactive at EOR saving for that jump, we're getting to have some more fun and action. we're one non-stop attacking family big_smile

Re: War 2477/2469 Vs 2472/2466

lol tbh i dont mind, if i was in your position id be doing the same,  but to answer the question vulturing is worse cos they taking advantage of 2 fams going at it hard and they com in and steal whats those 2 fams at war have worked for, farming is just about keeping possible future threats down and getting easy planets which is what this game is all about tongue

Re: War 2477/2469 Vs 2472/2466

aye, but i wouldnt class blow ups as vulturing
if i started attacking either of you then that would be, but blown up planets are anyone's tongue

i disagree with the keeping possible future threats down, there was no way on earth we were ever gonna cause you any problems

<Mizzle> ive been in a jailcel for the first time of my life during this night lol
<Mizzle> new experience big_smile

Re: War 2477/2469 Vs 2472/2466

naah start attacking me! be my guest =p

The Great Chupacubra has spoken!

Re: War 2477/2469 Vs 2472/2466

> [Bullet] wrote:

> aye, but i wouldnt class blow ups as vulturing
if i started attacking either of you then that would be, but blown up planets are anyone's tongue

i disagree with the keeping possible future threats down, there was no way on earth we were ever gonna cause you any problems


lol i said its 1 of 2 things tongue

209

Re: War 2477/2469 Vs 2472/2466

Last update:

Silvarian's killing me X(

Captures:
-------------------
205 from #2466
68 from #2472
1 from #2475
1 from #2468
1 from #2469
-------------------

Defeats:
-------------------
150 to #2466
90 to #2472
1 to #2475
1 to #2469
1 to #2468
-------------------

57 planet(s) lost by Lamp  sad haha

210

Re: War 2477/2469 Vs 2472/2466

2on1 feeling sucks sad

Re: War 2477/2469 Vs 2472/2466

well in response to upinsmokes comment if you pull out your mapfile 66 and 69 are pretty much right next to each other so why wouldnt we concentrate on them

draculas> my daughter just made cheerleading squad
Squeaky> ...is she hot?
draculas> shes 12 sicko
Squeaky> oh damn

Re: War 2477/2469 Vs 2472/2466

You can say your allies are inactive, which is true.  But mine are as well... their bankers/res cant even provide the attackers with fleet so all they do is retake... my other 2 attackers havent been around at all so im stuck here trying to hold all our planets.  And you can say what you like but we won this war, you've simply gained planets by retaking allies planets and sheer activity.  Zan knows i killed all of his good portals and pushed him away from my family.. and tryme too.  Im pretty sick of fighting alone now... geese and zeus arent around. hmm  Gonna do what i can on this last day i guess... shoulda just NAPed when you guys wanted because im really sick of this now tbh lol, just figured people would actually play instead of leaving me to do all the work.

"YOU DARE QUESTION THE WISDOM OF THE WARCHIEF?"

<Parrot> cause i am a massive faggot
<Parrot> and i love the cock

213 (edited by Rainin 04-Nov-2009 03:22:18)

Re: War 2477/2469 Vs 2472/2466

Of course 77 is going to gain planets when their right next to 72 which has no fleet and zan which has unlimited fleet, if i was closer to you guys I would have done alot more damage.. just be happy i wasnt.  You can ask lamp and a few others i did some damage to your family, quite a bit.  I blew up hundreds of planets because to be honest, i had no choice, i had to keep up in size with zan or risk losing my portals.  77 held on to their planets and did a very good job of retaking and being persistent, which led them to hold on to their planet lead and even increase it.  Hats off to zan for a good fight.   

Edited~ I guess i was a bit harsh on 72, they didnt do that bad.. i just expected more i guess hmm

"YOU DARE QUESTION THE WISDOM OF THE WARCHIEF?"

<Parrot> cause i am a massive faggot
<Parrot> and i love the cock

Re: War 2477/2469 Vs 2472/2466

lol you lost a bunch of portals first tick due to a n00b mistake or so? You had us outfleeted yet you opted to station your entire fleet somewhere... which allowed us to clear a bunch of ur dangerous portals.. We haven't lost anything in this war except some infra and portals... we gained planets, end of story, it was a fun fight, and will be till the last tick.

The Great Chupacubra has spoken!

Re: War 2477/2469 Vs 2472/2466

@ Tobes attacking again my bankers..... Classic of Tobes He GAY! smile
I dont see 21 figthing against one big family... only playing as bored...

I have fun against many families this round, but my players are inactives... now one banker and other attacker are actives and I have more fun... smile


I am figthing against 19, He crazy of Mattman raped one banker in my core... I am now capturing all portals of Mattman....

----------------
-   CAPTURES   -
----------------
36 planet(s) captured by BurnMyEternity (71 %) (7 retakes).
25 planet(s) captured by Darkant (60 %) (17 retakes).
6 planet(s) captured by BurnYourEvil SK (55 %) (6 retakes).
5 planet(s) captured by AZeR (63 %) (5 retakes).
-------------------
52 from #2419
20 from #2406
-------------------
We overwhelmed the enemy 72 times. 2 families and 71 planet(s) involved.
We actually gained 71 planet(s) in total.

----------------
-   BLOW-UPS   -
----------------
8 enemy planet(s) blown up by BurnMyEternity
3 enemy planet(s) blown up by Darkant

216 (edited by Rainin 03-Nov-2009 22:36:28)

Re: War 2477/2469 Vs 2472/2466

Im glad you enjoy lying about things.. thats cool.  Yes i gave you a few portals because once again, it was flip/you/zan all against me first tick, sound familiar? Thats because it happened to me last war too, Rain and Tyreal 2v1 against me.  I saved my fleet in both cases and through well played judgement/tactics was able to win.. you're an idiot if you think you won this war.  You did NO damage to my family, none. We gained 200 planets, and we're only start to lose them now because my entire family is inactive.  Nice try though, trying to make yourself look good.  The only good attacker in your family is zanharim who i have respect for, for you i have none.  Those planets you gained were from your allies, who are down about 400-500 planets, good job man.. you're so good.

"YOU DARE QUESTION THE WISDOM OF THE WARCHIEF?"

<Parrot> cause i am a massive faggot
<Parrot> and i love the cock

Re: War 2477/2469 Vs 2472/2466

And you can say i outfleeted you, but me and zan were around the same size. Flip was 2 mil NW higher then me. I forget what you were because you were not a threat.

"YOU DARE QUESTION THE WISDOM OF THE WARCHIEF?"

<Parrot> cause i am a massive faggot
<Parrot> and i love the cock

Re: War 2477/2469 Vs 2472/2466

eeeh dude you had us outsaved... and by far too... no need to brag now... winning a war with 2 times the other fams savings isn't all that hard... considered the circumstances i don't think you gained that much... why would we do damage ? we just did what we could to keep our core/sector clean, which wasn't easy because our allies were hardly communicating... FYI Zan was our main attacker, i wasn't... big boohooo for clearing me wink.

The Great Chupacubra has spoken!

Re: War 2477/2469 Vs 2472/2466

who won the war? tongue


Top 5 NW gain: (last 100 ticks)

   1. #2477: +4512625 nw
   2. #2475: +3249570 nw
   3. #2479: +2172188 nw
   4. #2469: +1949567 nw
   5. #2470: +1822847 nw

Top 5 planets gain: (last 100 ticks)

   1. #2477: +163 planets
   2. #2475: +86 planets
   3. #2479: +42 planets
   4. #2468: +41 planets
   5. #2476: +38 planets

Top 5 NW loss: (last 100 ticks)

   1. #2472: -1111545 nw
   2. #2478: -701977 nw
   3. #2465: -24527 nw
   4. N/A
   5. N/A

Top 5 planets loss: (last 100 ticks)

   1. #2469: -167 planets
   2. #2466: -64 planets
   3. #2473: -50 planets
   4. #2471: -48 planets
   5. #2474: -35 planets

Killbox ~ [url=http://gamma.astroempires.com/profile.aspx?player=23753][

Re: War 2477/2469 Vs 2472/2466

We gained 200 planets and blew up around 300 tongue Like i said my 2 other attacks and my retakers arent even active atm.. so we're losing planets, but it aint over yet and i plan to do some damage for fun tongue

"YOU DARE QUESTION THE WISDOM OF THE WARCHIEF?"

<Parrot> cause i am a massive faggot
<Parrot> and i love the cock

221

Re: War 2477/2469 Vs 2472/2466

I'd say 2466 and 2477 won, 2472 lost, and 2469 lost big time.

If you have to count it by alliance, I guess mine (77/69) lost because we're down some systems and 69 died. 2469, after some nice performance by Flip the first few days, crashed as you can see after Flip lost interest. And by raiding our inactive or helpless ally, 66's got some purchase in our core.

It's a lot of work keeping track of what we and our allies lose and retake hundreds constantly.

222 (edited by Rainin 04-Nov-2009 01:42:15)

Re: War 2477/2469 Vs 2472/2466

Oh i agree completely, but you have to understand that ignoring 69 would be the stupidist idea ever.  They're right in between us and the best possible target.  I took what planets i could from 77 as well, but being so far out of range i had to take what i could get and work my way in.  The first few days of the war was spent getting rid of the 50+ portals your alliance had near my family.. god that was a hassle big_smile

(dont quote me on the exact number.. may be a bit exagerated.. but im sure it was atleast 25!)

"YOU DARE QUESTION THE WISDOM OF THE WARCHIEF?"

<Parrot> cause i am a massive faggot
<Parrot> and i love the cock

223 (edited by Rainin 04-Nov-2009 01:43:58)

Re: War 2477/2469 Vs 2472/2466

I guess 72 was really on retakes.. even if they werent very offensive they sure were defensive, props to my allies for wasting 77's time rofl big_smile

"YOU DARE QUESTION THE WISDOM OF THE WARCHIEF?"

<Parrot> cause i am a massive faggot
<Parrot> and i love the cock

Re: War 2477/2469 Vs 2472/2466

ill not waste my time here defending my fam. we had problems and we did not fought like we should. but its unfair what is been said. wl and me fought with all we could and i consider silvarian words a backstab. congratz 77 and silvarian then for the "winning". and lets the round ends.

retired.

225 (edited by Rainin 04-Nov-2009 03:28:32)

Re: War 2477/2469 Vs 2472/2466

You're right, i guess i was a bit harsh.  You guys did break about even which isnt bad at all considering like i said you were outfleeted.  Sorry for being overly critical, and to be honest i cant see your family news so i had no right saying you didnt make that many attacks.  Just seemed like you didnt do too much because you were hardly ever on, and didnt seem to be doing any real damage to 77 hmm

I get highly competitive when i game... and i am sometimes overly harsh.  I usually take in all the facts and in this case those facts are only what i can see by results.

"YOU DARE QUESTION THE WISDOM OF THE WARCHIEF?"

<Parrot> cause i am a massive faggot
<Parrot> and i love the cock