Re: How awesome this game is!!!!!
do you seriously have no comprehension of the american revolutionary war?
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Universal News → How awesome this game is!!!!!
do you seriously have no comprehension of the american revolutionary war?
My enemies enemy is surely my friend...
"didn't USA lose the Vietnam war?"
Vietnam was never declared... therefore it wasn't an official war.
i didnt rage. I was never mad. I dont get mad at retarded folks. Thats just wrong.
> Jack O Lantern wrote:
> your a [moo] idiot. Its like arguing with a 12 year old. Pointless.
Of course people can say what they want. i can say "hoopla misha giggins ferrleplismooosh" and it makes just about as much sense as you. let people complain all they want and be poor sports all day long. I can give a shit less. But doesnt mean i have to respect them or give a shit about them cuz they lost. Too bad. suck it up and be a man.
Im done with this thread. respond if ya like, i wont read it. I can give a flying [MOO] what you have to say about this anymore. Dont matter what i say or how i say it. You just wanna argue to argue and twist my words in a feeble attempt to make yourself look smart. failed btw.
so maybe when you get out of highschool we can debate something else. Until that time, get educated kid.
Your rage you lose.
@counterstrike
Yep, the one and only ![]()
Keeping with actual topic it is infact impossible to farm now coz if ur fam is within 35% of attacking fam you are a viable equal target
for example:
1 [Dr] Brett I am dissapoint (2414) [93,16] 2283 47127436 164038
Cant hit
9 ORLY?! (2402) [12,114] 1789 15022975 109203
Or lower
so 1st place attacking anyone in top 10 is fair game as they all good big familys
Indeed - that was the purpose of the rule.
Unless we get hit first, that is. Then we're free to retaliate.
serves small fam right if they didnt plan attacks right
However, having said that - the rule only stops one kind of 'farming'. Saying "impossible to farm" is largely incorrect. We're still thinking of ways to make this a bit more fair for lower fams/players.
Reduce the individual players nw threshold. With the 35% fam rule its not needed and would get rid of the rubbish sending small nw player into enemies core
> ~Serenity~ wrote:
> "didn't USA lose the Vietnam war?"
Vietnam was never declared... therefore it wasn't an official war.
War is simply and fundamentally "the waging of armed conflict against an enemy".
Any other definition is political posturing.
(posturing = "adopting a vain conceited posture")
> mung wrote:
> > ~Serenity~ wrote:
> "didn't USA lose the Vietnam war?"
Vietnam was never declared... therefore it wasn't an official war.
War is simply and fundamentally "the waging of armed conflict against an enemy".
Any other definition is political posturing.
(posturing = "adopting a vain conceited posture")
The US Congress didn't ever actually declare war. Instead the US President used his "constitutional discretion" calling it a "police action". Therefore it is a conflict, not a war.
nope, just political posturing.
no history book ever written has or will refer to the vietnam war as anything but a war.
> mung wrote:
> nope, just political posturing.
Political posturing does not mean war.....
> mung wrote:
> no history book ever written has or will refer to the vietnam war as anything but a war.
Over exaggeration ftl. You cannot prove that statement, though I'm sure there is a history book out there somewhere that does not refer to the conflict as a war.
We were winning the Vietnam war but recalled because of all the negative press in our media. Alot of Americans died there yeah but a whole hell of alot more Vietcong troops were dying. If the administration had had the backbone to drown out the media it would have been settled at some point.
Political posturing is congress defining what is or isn't war.
Congress may try to redefine what war is, but that doesn't mean that the true definition of war has changed, it just means some ignorant portion of the american population may now believe that invading a country and killing millions of people is not a war.
And if you reread the definition of war that I posted, you will see that you have agreed by calling it a conflict.
> Zaige wrote:
> didn't USA lose the Vietnam war?
Also somewhere between 1600/1800 USA was being overrun by the english. The english we're the superior force in the western world at that time.
Good thing the france came to help the Americans at that time, they left the americans with a nice statue aswell!
Statue of Liberty
Not sure what the americans did to deserve the help from the france at that time, im guessing they helped them out when they we're in trouble.
I'm a proud Eurofag, Though not so proud on our education level in my country but thats another story.
lol not to mention uk was fighting 3 wars while u managed to claw a draw in the 1800, i may even go hunting for some stats for u later aswell
> ~Serenity~ wrote:
> > mung wrote:
> no history book ever written has or will refer to the vietnam war as anything but a war.
Over exaggeration ftl. You cannot prove that statement, though I'm sure there is a history book out there somewhere that does not refer to the conflict as a war.
that books exists. written by Howard Zinn, called The People's History of the United States"
says basically what serenity said.
most western developed countries are fat, no need for the bbc there. reading comprehension happens to be quite a strong point of mine actually, but you may believe what you will. while AA's analogy may not be the best, immediately jumping to the extreme of hitler and the jews is by no means making a better point or proving him wrong, it's clutching at straws. AA's point, however, makes sense. everyone bitches. i personally would get rid of the rule entirely. but as it is in place, small families have no reason to bitch.
oh also
You can kill ten of my men for every one I kill of yours, but even at those odds, you will lose and I will win.
--Ho Chi Minh to the French, late 1940s
said it to the French then, and to the Americans in the 60's. we would never have won.
@Ouro: 1 Nuke
Nuff said
No idea Torqez ![]()
Sorry I should have said "rational history book".
This thread is about how awesome this game is. right? uh...
Imperial Forum → Universal News → How awesome this game is!!!!!
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.