Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 52 ~

Yeah the new pax op is overpowered. Not only do you need a lot of ground to defend portals but now tons of wizzies to not get OHed and agents to not get nuked.... the amount of defenses needed to play banker is getting a bit lame.

Song of the Day: In My Head - By Jason Derulo

827

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 52 ~

Maybe we should all go partaxy banking lol. Torqez seems to be doing well with it.

828

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 52 ~

>Yeah the new pax op is overpowered. Not only do you need a lot of ground to defend portals but now tons of wizzies to not get OHed and agents to not get nuked.... the amount of defenses needed to play banker is getting a bit lame.

It's only putting CF banking on the same level as Pop banking. OH is actually weaker then being e-stormed, since pop can take such a long time to grow back.

Rehabilitated IC developer

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 52 ~

@Serenity

Its better this way. In fact i think its actually fairer.

As petrolstone states, pop banking has to regrow. Thats AFTER the estorms have
finished. OH allows CFs to return to their normal state after 6 ticks...

I am sKoE
Do you know what the chain of command is here? It's the chain I go get and beat you with to show you who's in command.

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 52 ~

Well now instead of having one or two huge bankers, fams have got to split them up into 4 or 5, you cant OH them all (unless youre the pax fam big_smile)

Mix and match, always interesting

But those fams with only a few bankers, tis unfortunate.

Destiny is only for those too own to make their fate weak.

~ Geese

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 52 ~

GJ ricking

Destiny is only for those too own to make their fate weak.

~ Geese

832

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 52 ~

draft me ricking i ll kill them both!

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 52 ~

lol quazbut there is a thorn in everybed of roses,  fact is your asking for this till go till eor? is that wise? i mean hell im sure im sure the tyrants good clean honest reputation can handle beating u down all that time but is that what u realy want?

ps: note to all , bondage is a personal choice and just cos u like it dont mean u should wish it on your entire fam, but if is a whiping your after quazbut dont complain when u get it i guess

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 52 ~

lol yeah you aren't down much planets yet tongue but you guys lost tons and tons of infra =p i think we more then decimated ur infra already...

The Great Chupacubra has spoken!

835

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 52 ~

This round has sucked so much. We've been under attack ALL round and never had a chance to build up. Then the two top cowardly families decide to farm what's left of us ( a 1 & 2 place alliace can't even go for a top 5 fam?). I'm not even a banker anymore, not that I ever was. The most I ever made this round was a mere 500k a tick; now it's as good as zero. I'm the guy holding planets below the 35% nw rule and it ticks me off. I've given serious thought into demolishing the rest of my buildings to further reduce my NW. Most of my planets are empty anyways.


69 and 77, How on earth is this fun? Is it fun like killing Ants with a magnifying glass, OR is it more like pulling the wings off of flies?

Rehabilitated IC developer

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 52 ~

Hey, if you go telling lies about NAPs to our allies and claim we had signed something like that for our alliance, it does not look good.

Before you next time do something like that, think first.

We would have hit you anyway of course and taken easy planets from you, but that NAP lie got some of us (especially those who negotiated the CF before your war against Rain) a bit pissed off at you.

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 52 ~

Pick on someone your own size you freakin nab.

~GalacticRuler~

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 52 ~

> Thelord wrote:

> Pick on someone your own size you freakin nab.

By your reasoning the biggest cant attack anyone..

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 52 ~

rofl,he attacked so many small fams this round it's unbelievable.I can understand attacking one,but when it gets to 3+ it's just ridiculous.

So your interpretation is false.

~GalacticRuler~

840 (edited by [Pw9]Shadow 19-Oct-2009 23:47:32)

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 52 ~

> Thelord wrote:

> rofl,he attacked so many small fams this round it's unbelievable.I can understand attacking one,but when it gets to 3+ it's just ridiculous.

So your interpretation is false.

yeah sorry but care too explain why its bad too attack small fams?
With attacking I mean attacking not farming. Grabbing 5 -10 planets from a smaller fam isnt that bad in my eyes. I do agree with farming. Thats a issue thats makes me sick. But for a fact I know that the only 'farm' 77 had was bullets fam, although opinions differ from it
. All the other 'small' fams were planet grabs for bankers and hardly deadly for the victims.

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 52 ~

haha the lord is in 2468 right ?

We have DECLARED WAR on family Meet Your Makers (2468).

have a good one.

The Great Chupacubra has spoken!

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 52 ~

wow i bet that makes you feel great doing that to a fam not in the top five let alone the top ten!!! haha you guys will get your ass handed to ya one day!!!!

Cameroons ftw every round

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 52 ~

How will that happen when all the top fams NAP?

DH (ave/\/\an

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 52 ~

part of the problem is probably cuz there isn't too many other fams to choose from. the top fams are actually napped with each other i think and given spatial problems/travel times fams are very limited in choices of fams to war/attack.  i think it would be a good idea to not reduce fam numbers but increase them and have less players per fam.

845 (edited by KevinDore 20-Oct-2009 00:49:03)

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 52 ~

> [Pw9]Shadow wrote:

> > Thelord wrote:

> rofl,he attacked so many small fams this round it's unbelievable.I can understand attacking one,but when it gets to 3+ it's just ridiculous.

So your interpretation is false.

yeah sorry but care too explain why its bad too attack small fams?
With attacking I mean attacking not farming. Grabbing 5 -10 planets from a smaller fam isnt that bad in my eyes. I do agree with farming. Thats a issue thats makes me sick. But for a fact I know that the only 'farm' 77 had was bullets fam, although opinions differ from it
. All the other 'small' fams were planet grabs for bankers and hardly deadly for the victims.

Shadow, I believe you meant to say that you do *not* believe in farming?  Correct me if I'm wrong.  And you are mistaken, Bullets fam was not the only farm that 77 has had, farming is exactly what they are trying to do to us, and is exactly what they are gonna try to do to 68 now.

And to 68:  I know his fam is huge, I know it's an unstoppable force, but they are arrogant, and they will bite off more than they can chew if they keep this up.  My advice to you is the same advice I've given my fam.  Do NOT give them a ridiculous amount of planets for a nap, if their demands are unreasonable, make them work for each and every planet they take, just like we are.

I'm not a pheasant feather plucker or a feather plucker's son, but I can pluck a pheasant's feathers till the pheasant plucker comes!

846 (edited by Thelord 20-Oct-2009 01:24:09)

Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 52 ~

i'm actually happy they declared,it proves my point,they're pathetic.At least i'll get some good laughs as i see some bullies hitting some pretty much defenseless fam.I dared you oldschooler? Pretty much another excuse to attack us,not the first time a fam *provoked* you guys,i wonder why.

My only regret is that i didn't get a chance to see you all destroyed...but that will come in time.So..still a war to be had,bring it,you bunch of idiots.

Oh...and by the way Kevin...i'd rather commit suicide than to ever nap these idiots.

~GalacticRuler~