• Posts: 71

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

"lying" static?   you spell it "lieng?"  I feel it my duty to inform you that you should stop posting in public forums because you look stupid.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 845
  • Tag points: 12

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

Posting that someone made a spelling mistake is stupid and a waste of forum space.

and yes, posting that some is stupid posting that someone is stupid posting with spelling mistakes is also stupid!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,805
  • Tag points: 3

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

Opti is stupid neutral


rawr

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

104 Reply by Emi

  • Emi
  • Emi
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1,730

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

hahaha, he makes me laugh tho wink EVEN IN TIME OF WAR

DON'T GIMMIE THAT MELLOCHIA!

2003-10-30      Activated my account
2003-10-30     Registered!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 0

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

hahahaha @ brig

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

106 Reply by Nai

  • Nai
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1,047

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

Anyone care to tell me what the heck a "[Paddlepop Lion]" is? I mean really... what the heck is a paddlepop lion?  Skoe?

For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 498
  • Tag points: 186

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

> Brigitageous wrote:

> "lying" static?   you spell it "lieng?"  I feel it my duty to inform you that you should stop posting in public forums because you look stupid.


Hey there junior, im not writing a research paper here im posting on the forum of imperialconflict.com,  it doesn't matter... get over yourself, maybe you get off thinking your more intelligent by picking out a mistake i made, go be a a teacher if you want to correct people all day jackass...

X(

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,532

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

seems like 42 is using warblocks...
/me ads another 200 planets to the list he will take of 42 bevor a nap.

Tobi

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

109 Reply by Emi

  • Emi
  • Emi
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1,730

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

ur a badass matrix!

DON'T GIMMIE THAT MELLOCHIA!

2003-10-30      Activated my account
2003-10-30     Registered!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,532

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

now i only need to find out how to take your fam to -200 planets... tongue

Tobi

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 4,498
  • Tag points: 4

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

Jeeze, personally, I feel "ad hominid" atks are the last resort of a lousy debater.  When someone cant refute, has no logic on their side,  and no facts to call on, they atk the personality or character of the person they are opposed to. The next to last resort of a losy debater, seems to be sidetracking  the argument: bring up unrelated ideas/arguments, to keep away from the main isssue.

I seem to see both going on here.  I am not going to name names. I expect you are all intelligent enough to see whom I am pointing my finger(s) at.

And, just to prove my point: Other than a couple of dangling participles and a possible couple of misspellings, and one possible slang word, I have typed perfectly correct English. This is somethng someone once said in this thread (i.e. failure to do so) should invalidate my opinions.

I fail to see how someone types or spells should invalidate his facts or opinions. Just as I fail to see how sexual preference  or income or jobs should.

75% of all players in IC have hemorroids,

the other 25% are perfect assholes.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

112 Reply by Emi

  • Emi
  • Emi
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1,730

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

shutup, stay outa threads

DON'T GIMMIE THAT MELLOCHIA!

2003-10-30      Activated my account
2003-10-30     Registered!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 845
  • Tag points: 12

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

Matrix
Player Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..now i only need to find out how to take your fam to -200 planets...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Simple.

Keep hitting them till they all delete. Explore all those new planets.

Wait till they join new fams, and take another 200 planets from them.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,810

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

> Optical Illusions wrote:

> Matrix
Player Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..now i only need to find out how to take your fam to -200 planets...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Simple.

Keep hitting them till they all delete. Explore all those new planets.

Wait till they join new fams, and take another 200 planets from them.


nice strategy big_smile use it 638

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 6,734
  • Tag points: 34

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

damnit hummy! don't get smart in here!

Modestus Experitus

Arby: A very strict mod, reminds me of a fat redneck who drives a truck around all day with a beer in one hand. I hated this guy at the start, however, I played a round in PW with him where he went as an anonymous player. Our fam got smashed up and everyone pretty much left. Arby stayed around and helped out the remaining family. At the end of the round he revealed himself.... My views on him have changed since. Your a good guy.....

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

116 Reply by Emi

  • Emi
  • Emi
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1,730

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

A+

DON'T GIMMIE THAT MELLOCHIA!

2003-10-30      Activated my account
2003-10-30     Registered!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,047
  • Tag points: 46

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

kidssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss stupid kid yikes

i love you all!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

118 Reply by Oxygen (edited by Oxygen 23-Apr-2008 20:47:38)

  • Posts: 2,805
  • Tag points: 3

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

Well let's give the galaxy an update on this war:


After removing Emi's portals near us, we have begun BANKER RAIDS! yay


After raiding Jiraija, he attempted to rebuild ground and attack Tobi.  He ran his new ground into his figs and then deleted.

As of this tick, we have also raided Sumeria and taken almost 200 planets.  This will surely cripple their economy, and maybe another deletion? Only time will tell.


642 is currently up 100 planets (ish) in the war, and adding to this ticks raid, 300 planets (ish) smile I will get an actual update in a few min!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,805
  • Tag points: 3

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

-   CAPTURES   -
----------------
53 planet(s) captured by Severus Snape (100 %).
40 planet(s) captured by Voldemort (93 %).
31 planet(s) captured by Albus Dumbledore (97 %).
31 planet(s) captured by Rubeus Hagrid (97 %).
25 planet(s) captured by Viktor Krum (100 %).
3 planet(s) captured by Grindelwald (100 %).
1 planet(s) captured by Netherguard (100 %).
-------------------
184 from #642
-------------------
We overwhelmed the enemy 184 times. 1 families and 184 planet(s) involved.
We actually gained 184 planet(s) in total.

---------------
-   DEFEATS   -
---------------
17 planet(s) lost by Voldemort
3 planet(s) lost by Severus Snape
1 planet(s) lost by Albus Dumbledore
1 planet(s) lost by Grindelwald
-------------------
22 to #642

-   CAPTURES   -
----------------
128 planet(s) captured by Voldemort (79 %) (18 retakes).
90 planet(s) captured by Grindelwald (85 %) (13 retakes).
44 planet(s) captured by Albus Dumbledore (81 %) (16 retakes).
27 planet(s) captured by Netherguard (93 %) (20 retakes).
26 planet(s) captured by Rubeus Hagrid (65 %) (15 retakes).
10 planet(s) captured by Severus Snape (83 %) (1 retakes).
8 planet(s) captured by Ron Weasley (80 %) (8 retakes).
4 planet(s) captured by Viktor Krum (100 %) (4 retakes).
-------------------
317 from #642
10 from #663
10 from #641

---------------
-   DEFEATS   -
---------------
77 planet(s) lost by Grindelwald
71 planet(s) lost by Voldemort
28 planet(s) lost by Netherguard
24 planet(s) lost by Albus Dumbledore
18 planet(s) lost by Rubeus Hagrid
3 planet(s) lost by Severus Snape
2 planet(s) lost by Ron Weasley
1 planet(s) lost by Gilderoy Lockhart
-------------------
214 to #642
8 to #663
2 to #641


So basically, in the past 55 weeks, we have gained 275 planets.  Add that to the 75 or so we gained the year before, and we have ourselves a MASSACRE!!! smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 4,190
  • Tag points: 1699

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

Hi. My name is Genesis and I approve this post.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

1500 Tag Points

  • Posts: 3,639
  • Tag points: 345

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

wow, what crap:p

Sex without the e is still SX!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 845
  • Tag points: 12

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

I dont like showing off oxygen smile

but in this instance, against low life nap breakers I guess we can afford to boast a tiny bit..

and Nolio..  didnt you do a update not to many days ago saying we have crap attackers and if we ever fight 42 our round is over? ^_^

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

123 Reply by Nai

  • Nai
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1,047

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

yeah, think its time for some of that Nooblio loving smile

For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

124 Reply by Royal Whitebeard (edited by Royal Whitebeard 23-Apr-2008 21:30:42)

  • Posts: 1,383

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

yeah nolio, it seems you havent done your homework... if our attackers are crap, than 642 has none... tongue

but anyway... no bad feelings.... you cant really know which players we have in our fam wink - so basically your update was pretty good wink - just not accurate for our fam smile

Cheat Sheet = Grindelwald = Whitebeard = Lunarstar = Natale = Valkiria

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

125 Reply by Naci

  • Naci
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1,553

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

or he was right about your fam and wrong about 42 tongue

0 Dislike 0 Post Points