Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Universal News → Most over/under-rated attackers...
> General Mizzle wrote:
> Yeah and do n00blet ratings:
I will sure as hell finish 1st in being n00b 
Hence my earned title: ubern00blet!
do you want to fight?
I will fight you X(
/me will send a fleet into a laser trap on purpose to prove it 
![[Bullet]](https://imperialconflict.com/forum/img/avatars/15004.png)
i wouldnt even do it on purpose...i'd just forget to PI before i sent all my pretty droids in
again -.-
OK danny 5/5/5/5
w00t
> [Bullet] wrote:
> can i be over-rated please? 
done.
Else you would have token my ubern00blet tag maybe....
Lol failed anarchy
-Aleph: 8/9/8/5 total: 30
Aleph gets a 30 for what? Overjumping fleet? He's also one of the most inactive attackers you can find. And IF he's active, he'll delete on you at a high %. Fail
-Br0k3r: 8/8/7/5 total: 28
Broker attacks??
-Colorado: 7/8/8/7 total: 30
Overrated.
-Destroyyoutoo: 6/4/5/6 total: 21
Seriously??? DYT is not an attacker =p
-Dragonsup: 8/6/7/7 total: 28
Dragonsup? You do realize he hasn't been reliable/active since Adeath broke up
-fygaro: 8/6/6/8 total: 28
I'm sorry but that is a joke. Fygaro has never been a good attacker. Ever. Good infra planner, good banker, but never a good attacker. Fail
-Hardcore4yearsago: 9/10/8/5 total: 32
-ic death: 6/7/6/4 total: 23
IC Death isn't always the best leader, but you have to give him just a bit more credit. He's still a good attacker when active. Nobody can say that he doesn't know his stuff.
-lew lew: 9/8/6/8 total: 31
MF'N fail. Lew sucks now. He's a nice guy and all, but honestly nobody in here can ever say that Lew is currently one of the best attackers. He hasn't been relevant or active since 2003. Epic Fail. He's no more than a sor guy. And even then he's not even attacking. Get it right noobs.
-Luster: 7/7/7/6 total: 27
Yeah? Seriously who gave him this rating? Divide it by 2. And I'm not saying that just because he's sucked last round and this round, this is just a consistent thing. Luster fails. Reliable my ass.
-Metrex: 6/6/8/9 total: 29
Seriously? I love Metrex and all but this is overrating him. He JUST got out of virgo like last week. He's still learning about the game. I guess we are not letting people earn their status anymore.
-noir: 9/6/5/5 total: 25
Ok...are we basing this on now? Or 2004 when he was actually using his fleet? And even then he wasn't all that impressive. Fail
-Nolio: 6/4/5/3 total: 18
No comment.
-Portgas: 8/7/6/7 total: 28
Epic Fail. Portgas has only been a decent attacker for like 3 of his 20 rounds.
-Primo: 6/4/8/8 Total: 26
Meh, Primo knows his stuff when he's active.
-Rain: 7/6/6/6 total: 25
When has rain been good again? Seriously?
-Rizzy: 7/9/8/4 total: 28
Rizzy is being overrated lol Again, love him but you have to be "consistent".
-roxanne: 8/8/7/9 total: 32
OMG epic fail. Roxanne is an active retaker. Nothing more.
-Scorp: 6/6/7/4 total: 23
ok underrated!!!! Scorp is one of the best all around players in IC. Stop being noobs with these ratings.
-Snailsex: 7/7/8/6 total: 28
Snail attacks????
-Teddy: 4/5/6/4 total: 19
Overrated lol
-Tico: 9/8/4/6 total: 27
Overrated. Even when Tico DOES play, he's still not that great. He just retakes and farms.
-Tryme: 1/1/1/1 total: 4
Tryme sucks but give him some more credit.
-Tsunami: 7/9/8/6 total: 30
Tsunami is a nice guy and WAS a good attacker. But not since 2003. And DEFINITELY not since cap has been around. Overrated.
-Tymo: 8/9/10/7 total: 34
Only thing I have to say is that TYMO could be much better if he wasn't such a selfish player.
-Whiteshadow: 8/7/10/9 total: 34
Overrated. Great all around player but outside of his core, he's no threat to anyone. Fail
-Zanharim: 8/7/7/8 total: 30
Fail.
-Zidi: 10/9/6/5 total: 30
Fail.
Wow are there any good attackers left Nolio?
i think i'm underrated =p
I think your not rated...
I'm UNRATED , ooo sounds promiscuous
me too!
i'm UN-rated too shows what happens when you miss a few rounds..
i wonder what my attacker rating would be
add me there 1/1/2/1
Wait wait...
Are we talking bout all time or now?
Cause really doesnt Noir deserve to be higher up... I remember him being a monster everytime he played seriously. And where are Gen, Talic, Valenka... All round changing players whom I believe are currently playing (not sure bout attacking though... too out of touch ). And I still believe Scorp is a better banker than attacker.
Btw, what are the numbers mean again? (yes bad grammer)
> General Mizzle wrote:
> Wow are there any good attackers left Nolio?
Not really lol
That's why a lot of people are considered good. Rizzy, artic, metrex, naci, etc. etc.
As long as you're active you're pretty much a good attacker based on the current standards.
@nolio
Whiteshadow: 8/7/10/9 total: 34
Overrated. Great all around player but outside of his core, he's no threat to anyone. Fail
lol i dont care if im overrated or underrated or not rated its just funny what people post and they dont even think about what they say.
Who always has either the biggest core or almost the biggest core in the whole gal? Yep WS fams, thus why wud I need to be a threat outside of it since its sooooooooooo BIG.
Of course i dont know how it gets so big without going OUTSIDE my core in the first place.
I mean even this round all of sec 1 is my fams core and a large portion of sec 3 also but how did our fam get all that area in sec 3 which is OUTSIDE our core
oh well however it gets done long as it gets done is fine with me, all i really care about is when i play to win we usually either win or are in top 3 all the rest is just fun talk
Back to being a Fail
Through naps. You're a core defender, infra planner and opper. You're not a HC attacker. Nothing wrong with that but for this particular list, you're overrated =p
I are awesome attacker X(
there were so many "i really like him but....."
they're nice to date, just cant attack in nolio's book
> Ouro wrote:
> > [Bullet] wrote:
> can i be over-rated please?
done.
thx
Imperial Forum → Universal News → Most over/under-rated attackers...
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.