Declarative Statement!

> Morbo the Annihilator wrote:

> > That's not an attack on Russia.

In the eyes (foreign policy) of Russia it is...

...If China blew up FBI agents that had been sent to Tibet -- what
would you say?

I would not say that China started a War with the US because they killed acouple american civilians.

>>In the eyes (foreign policy) of Russia it is...<<

To Russia , our embassies in Georgia, Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania encroach on Russian soil and promote usurpers.  Screw their perspectives

> i would not say Canada started a War with the US because they
> killed acouple american civilians... Americans get killed all over
> the world. we havent started any wars over it.

We aren't talking about civilians at all...We are talking about government
employees -- "peacekeepers".

I don't know what lala land you live in, but if United States federal agents
were attacked whilst on a peace keeping mission the United States would
act appropriately.

> war

I don't believe i said war. You said war. If i did i apologize, but i meant
"military reaction" or a counter operation to protect the citizens in question.

in russia, the offensive offends you!

"As opposed to you. Fighting the Russians...Wait, which war did you fight the Russians in again? Oh
thats right -- you are nothing but talk too. I have no intention of ever becoming a soldier. Probably
why i said 'should'. As in, its my ideals and beliefs."

You should read:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archangel_(operation)

I'm sure not many people know of it (look up other websites since I'm sure you wont want to use wikipedia as your only source), but after Russia signed a treaty with the Germans during WWI, British/French/ and American troops went into Siberia and fought the Russians to ensure that German troops didn't take control of key points. You can look at the nice numbers for each side and their casualties. Notice how the Russians got their ass kicked?

So yes, America has fought the Russians during war.

Bet you just learned something didn't you.

> So yes, America has fought the Russians during war.

I used the word "you" to refer to Chris personally...

He states i only use words. But which war did he fight against the
Russians in again?

> Bet you just learned something didn't you.

I did. And it was interesting, thank you. Its not what i meant though.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

> 1. The United Nations Commission on Human Rights in 2001
> found "extremely grave" human rights violations

Not an explicit attack on America or Americans.

> 2. Iraqi production and use of weapons of mass destruction (biological weapons,
> chemical weapons, and long-range missiles), all in violation of U.N. resolutions.

Not an explicit attack on America or Americans.

> 3. Iraq used proceeds from the "oil for food" U.N. program to purchase weapons
> rather than food for its people.

Not an explicit attack on America or Americans.

> 4. Iraq flagrantly violated the terms of the weapons inspection
> program before discontinuing it altogether.

Not an explicit attack on America or Americans.

Again: "...IMPLICITLY threatened U.S. foreign interests."

"> 2. Iraqi production and use of weapons of mass destruction (biological weapons,
> chemical weapons, and long-range missiles), all in violation of U.N. resolutions.

Not an explicit attack on America or Americans"

Yeah, we shouldnt attack someone that is violating ALL UN resolutions. Especially if theyre making nukes. Just let them do as they want till they wipe our country out. Retaliatory attacks fail when it comes to nuclear war, especially if they just wiped out a huge portion of your country in one attack. But thats fine and dandy since you would allow Iraq to do whatever they please. You would do great in the UN.

"3. Iraq used proceeds from the "oil for food" U.N. program to purchase weapons
4. Iraq flagrantly violated the terms of the weapons inspection "

Since Dec 28, 1998, while the UN was enforcing the no-fly zones over Iraq. Iraqis were firing at coalition aircraft with surface-to-air missiles, anti-aircraft artillery and by targeting them with weapons radar.

And by UN, I mean mainly US aircraft. Therefore it was a direct attack on the US, even Saddam offered rewards if anyone could shoot down coalition aircraft.

Your only point seems to be, America has to allow for Russia to do what it likes. We don't. If you appeal to a rule of national interest, russian aggression violates ours

> Stating anti-US stuff = me pointing out facts. Dont get butt hurt.

Har Har...I am not anti-US you retarded clown. I am saying it is unfair
of Chris to analyse and discredit the actions of Russia, when the U.S.
has done what is essentially the same thing.

My point has nothing to do with morals, allowing Russia to do anything, or
anyone's national interest.

Blind ignorance is annoying.

Rawr.

Poland started the war by mobilizing against germany