Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

> her titties are not out, are you blind? i have already explained in plain english
> why i disagree with their censorship, maybe you should read a thread before
> commenting on it.

Yes, they are out...They might not be in plain sight, but they are indeed out.

Aren't we talking about a kingdom that just a few hundred years ago would have been
dishonorable to show a ladies ankles in?


> And then you realise the girl is ugly and thus has no place in our adverts.

lol

I am sKoE
Do you know what the chain of command is here? It's the chain I go get and beat you with to show you who's in command.

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

> Morbo the Annihilator wrote:

> > her titties are not out, are you blind? i have already explained in plain english
> why i disagree with their censorship, maybe you should read a thread before
> commenting on it.

Yes, they are out...They might not be in plain sight, but they are indeed out.


her titties are underneath clothing, and by most standards, not "out"

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

> her titties are underneath clothing, and by most standards, not "out"

Very loose clothing. From another perspective they could well be visible.

I am sKoE
Do you know what the chain of command is here? It's the chain I go get and beat you with to show you who's in command.

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

seems like we have to define the meaning of "titties"  yikes

till the end of time..

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

when women wear dresses or skirts, from another view, their vaginas could be visible, yet, we dont see advertisements banned because the pussy is "out". and by most censorship standards its much worse to show pussy then titties.

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

> ..Nemeara.. wrote:

> seems like we have to define the meaning of "titties"  yikes


titties meaning tits meaning nipples.... unless you think any image where theres cleavage needs a ban?

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

> when women wear dresses or skirts, from another view

From an inappropriate view. The advert could become inappropriate from
just walking past.

And yes, short skirts that 'reveal' should be banned.

I am sKoE
Do you know what the chain of command is here? It's the chain I go get and beat you with to show you who's in command.

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

> Morbo the Annihilator wrote:

> > when women wear dresses or skirts, from another view

From an inappropriate view. The advert could become inappropriate from
just walking past.

And yes, short skirts that 'reveal' should be banned. <


  Indeed.
Kids see that stuff, ever wonder what kind of impression that gives them?

"So, it's defeat for you, is it? Someday I must meet a similar fate..."

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

She looks 18+.

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

> Morbo the Annihilator wrote:

> > when women wear dresses or skirts, from another view

From an inappropriate view. The advert could become inappropriate from
just walking past.

And yes, short skirts that 'reveal' should be banned.


if someone was dressed like the advert, then the view where you would be able to see something would be an inappropriate view.

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

> if someone was dressed like the advert, then the view where
> you would be able to see something would be an inappropriate view.

No, because just walking past you could see her 'bits'.

Thus inappropriate...

I am sKoE
Do you know what the chain of command is here? It's the chain I go get and beat you with to show you who's in command.

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

no wonder she's unhappy.. she's called Ryan.. wtf??

<@Nick> it always scares me when KT gets all dominatrixy
* I_like_pie is now known as pie|bbl
<@KT|afk> Look at him run!
<@Nick> if you tell him to slap you and call you mommy
<@Nick> i'm leaving and never coming back

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

> Morbo the Annihilator wrote:

> > if someone was dressed like the advert, then the view where
> you would be able to see something would be an inappropriate view.

No, because just walking past you could see her 'bits'.

Thus inappropriate...


first of all, the tits appear to be pressing against the cloth, so you wouldnt be able to see them from any angle. if someone is wearing something like that, going really close to her and looking at her from an angle to see her tits is inappropriate.

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

To be honest I don't think humanity is ready for  that  kind of fasion to walk down the street; we're still too primitive and base-instinct driven.
Besides, would anyone here be comfortable seeing young girls walking down the street looking like that? I wouldn't. I wouldn't know where to look... hell, thanks to these new "leggings" (they're tights with the feet cut off ffs) that every woman and child from 6 to 60 is wearing I don't know where to look NOW.

  Sometimes just walking through town makes me feel like a sex-offender.

"So, it's defeat for you, is it? Someday I must meet a similar fate..."

65 (edited by avogadro 08-Oct-2009 20:39:12)

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

> &#9773; Fokker wrote:

> To be honest I don't think humanity is ready for  that  kind of fasion to walk down the street; we're still too primitive and base-instinct driven.
Besides, would anyone here be comfortable seeing young girls walking down the street looking like that? I wouldn't. I wouldn't know where to look... hell, thanks to these new "leggings" (they're tights with the feet cut off ffs) that every woman and child from 6 to 60 is wearing I don't know where to look NOW.

  Sometimes just walking through town makes me feel like a sex-offender.


she wasnt walking down the street, the setting was in a room. in some of the photo's there appears to be a bed, she's in her early 20's so her dorm? you never been in a dorm with a girl that wasnt fully dressed that you werent romantically interested in? well, if you ever are, i'll clue you in, walking close to her and looking at an angle to see her tits is inappropriate.

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

> she wasnt walking down the street


???

"The following advert has been banned"

It doesn't matter WHERE she is in the photo tongue.

I am sKoE
Do you know what the chain of command is here? It's the chain I go get and beat you with to show you who's in command.

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

you said

"No, because just walking past you could see her 'bits'."

you couldnt see her "bits" looking at a photo in the public by just walking by. you were talking about the setting. in the setting, she was in what appears to be a dorm, where you couldnt just walk by and see her tits.

Re: Should this Advert have been Banned?

> you couldnt see her "bits" looking at a photo in the public by just walking by. you
> were talking about the setting. in the setting, she was in what appears to be a dorm,
> where you couldnt just walk by and see her tits.

I see your point, but i was more hinting at the fact that if she is wearing those clothes
around town it'd be deemed inappropriate. How is shoving a picture of it into the faces
of our youth any different?

Also she looks like a dude...

I am sKoE
Do you know what the chain of command is here? It's the chain I go get and beat you with to show you who's in command.