Since you are obviously pretty ignorant to what this thread is, it is Current Attacker Ratings, not current leader ratings,  yo uwere the one talking shit and talking in the forum about how you were going to kill them,  You were the one who got too cocky to take their offers for a nap and then stopped logging in much to do anything resulting in them raping you guys.

And how quickly I deleted last round?  I was in my family for atleast 2 weeks after my drafts deleted for personal reasons leaving just skyro and I.

Your emo tears are delicious.

HC4E dont be trying to move in on my spot as archangles most hated guy dude, go get ur own

@archangle
I don't care about your opinion, I care about defending my honour. Ask anyone I've ever played in the same fam as what my activity and reliability are like instead of making things up.

1st archangle hc4e has a habit of doing things same as you do from time to time and thats not making things up only, but its stretching the truth, and the MAIN thing he does as well as you and many others is "not looking at the whole picture when pointing something out that may appear as a negative when in reality its a plus when u look at the big picture and I will give examples. Not that I care like u do about the honor things because I have my honor whether anyone thinks i do or not so i dont feel the need to defend that but i do like to point out faults, false statements, and also faulty statements that appear to be correct when in reality they are false as u get the whole picture.

also keep in mind that hc4e is more of a negative type player that finds it hard to point out good things vs bad things, and if he doesnt like you he surely will never say anything good about you, unlike me I cant stand you yet I have many times said u were one of the best eco leaders and very honorable but just an average attacker.

and to be fair with hc4e he is both a great eco player as well as one of the best attacker minds in the game if he deicides to play to win.

now for the examples of him making statments that are not true when u look at the full picture as well as making false statements even tho they may not be done "knowing" they were false he doesnt take the time to make sure something is fact before he runs with it.

Scorp: 3/5/5/4  total: 17
Without his attempts at Illegal Alliances, Scorp is unable to win a war.  He likes to talk a lot of shit and threaten a lot of people but has never shown he can back it up.

no hc4e cant stand scorp at all and thus the false statment that scorp cant win without an IA and also saying "has never shown he can back it up".

hc4e has been gone for 2 yrs until last 3 rounds and apparantly doesnt want to acknowledge that scorp won round 1 cap as well as rd 2 cap with allies. He started as the leader both times then i took over afterwards about mid round so scorp knows how to win yet due to dislike he makes false claims.

now look at what he says about the next 2 attackers:

Lyvidian: 9/7/7/9 total: 32
Really arose the last number of rounds as a great attacker.

-Whiteshadow: 7/8/9/8  total: 32
Doesn't really think his attacks through, relies heavily on overfunding and overjumping his fleet to beat families.  Likes to risk a lot of shady "deals" with families
as well to try and win his fights. His activity and aggressiveness definately give him a good advantage over others though.

Keep in mind now hc4e has been gone over 2yrs other than last 3 rounds so his ONLY recent experience with me is the half round he played in my fam rd 4 when we won the round.

He says based on the half rd with me that I dont think my attacks thru, yet I've won 3 rd's in size out of 4 (which involves planning attacks thru) i've won every galaxy there has been, even when my fams havent won 90% of the time i end up top 5 and usually top 3, thus he made a false statement there.

then he says "relies heavily on overfunding and overjumping his fleet to beat families"

once again he relies on half a round to say this and doesnt take the BIG picture in view. Example of the BIG picture vs his narrow picture of me being the BIg fleet guy. also notice that he didnt say that about "Lyvidian" and the fact is Lyvidian is the one that likes to build huge fleets and he did it well rd 4 as my allies and did it as my enemy in icpg 2 times.

1750 rd 4 we had overwhelming eco thus if u look at our fam and lets say we had 100mil NW and I had 10mil nw fleet thats 10% of our eco and then the other fam had maybe 50mil eco nw and their attacker had 5mil nw fleet it appears that my 10mil fleet is excesive yet its NOT its the same as they other guy as far as "overfunding or overjumping"  wudnt it be stupid to not use the eco lead to keep enuf fleet to not lose vital portals to smaller yet large fams?

plus the fact that he did get right about activity and agression shud mean that i would be the logical choice to have the big fleet as I usually am the one that gets the core built and protected for the fam.

and lastly, he said, Likes to risk a lot of shady "deals" with families as well to try and win his fights.

this is an example of someone telling him something and he never verifies it and never proves it just simply runs with it cause he was told it, and its ONCE AGAIN based on half a round in same fam yet its said as tho its some kind of fact of my play which is false, I have never made shady deals, its either been legal or not done period, shady w/e that means is not illegal if its not illegal. its either illegal or legal.

so in the end archangle if its not true then dont worry about it or do like I do and "for entertainment purposes only" go at it lol

this is the biggest most pointless dick measuring thread in the history of IC

So in other words you won't take up my challenge because you don't actually have any reason for calling me averagely reliable and active.

Eh, and still no rating for Hummy? Jeese. I'd a thot Hummy deserved a rating,  even if not a good one.

hummy

6/9/6/9

just my humble opinion

ya but attacking and attacking resourcing are two completely different things. or atleast should be if your doing it right, whos going to give you a good ranking when retaking as a resourcer but being tried as an attacker lol

i based ur activity/reliability on icpg 2 which u went on holiday/missing

didnt even have the eor war that was promised.

and that is the most current.

h4e...i think the activity determines the role before the rnd starts...so if Zidi cant be active, he would naturally take up a less active role (resource attacker) and therefore not make as many attacks?

too many people here are taking themselves way too seriously

As said 10 million times already - its just a bit of fun, one persons opinion.

some of us didnt even get on the list X(