• Posts: 1,005

Topic: 2282 and 2288 vs 2292 and probably 2294

Week 20, 21, to Middle of Foohon Middle (2292)
I hereby cancel the 48h nap between our fams at tick 20 year 21. attacks and opps may be made at tick 16 (i think) year 22.

Good luck

i sent this message to the leader and 2 vls of 2292

(2288 cancel on 2292)

i am sure 94 will want to join in and have some fun as well


good luck to all

"Ed's a bit of a trouble maker, in other words, he's an asshole" - Archangel 2007

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 847

Re: 2282 and 2288 vs 2292 and probably 2294

this will probably be a one sides fight. Mainly because 94 and 92 their economics are far better then that of 88 and 82. im cheering for 88/82 because they are outgunned on this one.

Good luck to all family's in this war.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,446
  • Tag points: 70

Re: 2282 and 2288 vs 2292 and probably 2294

88/82 both cancelled on 92, but my fam(94) never had naps with either of them, so we're not that near them and its going to be much closer than u seem to think.

I was using a metaphor that means God is watching us. You've heard this, there's a toilet on the roof.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,517

Re: 2282 and 2288 vs 2292 and probably 2294

pretty cool that they cancel on 92.

[color=cyan][u] [i]Fremen Forever

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,810

Re: 2282 and 2288 vs 2292 and probably 2294

yup, wonder how long they saved up for this

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 847

Re: 2282 and 2288 vs 2292 and probably 2294

not that long, they we're in a war with 87

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Iggo
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 486
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 2282 and 2288 vs 2292 and probably 2294

w0000t GOOOO SHARKS!

I am Awesome!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 2282 and 2288 vs 2292 and probably 2294

rofl, what these fams hope to gain ill never know, i have been involved helping allies the past 24 hours, and will now continue to go on no holes barred.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,865
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 2282 and 2288 vs 2292 and probably 2294

by that time i think 88 will have no shares with 92...lol

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 847

Re: 2282 and 2288 vs 2292 and probably 2294

well aren't we a bit cocky here lee?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,264
  • Tag points: 51

Re: 2282 and 2288 vs 2292 and probably 2294

alwaays tongue

21:19] <&James|sunstorm> any body name james is punishble by raid or nuke
[21:19] * UnDeath is now known as James
[21:19] * James ([email protected]) Quit ( NickServ (GHOST command used by James|sunstorm) )

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Iggo
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 486
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 2282 and 2288 vs 2292 and probably 2294

> Lee wrote:

> rofl, what these fams hope to gain ill never know, i have been involved helping allies the past 24 hours, and will now continue to go on no holes barred.


We hope to gain some fun idiot, thats the whole point of a game tongue!

I am Awesome!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,810

Re: 2282 and 2288 vs 2292 and probably 2294

82 had very few shares with 92, so it was mostly attackers fighting, but 88 have a lot of juicy shares with 92, so it will definitely be interesting

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 2282 and 2288 vs 2292 and probably 2294

88 have no shares with 92 bankers, or at least they wont have by the time Nap Expires.

on the other hand 92 have a lot of shares with 88 bankers wink

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 847

Re: 2282 and 2288 vs 2292 and probably 2294

When are we gonna see some action from the big guy from 2282?

he's been at that NW lvl for a day or 2 now and not seen much changes.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 2282 and 2288 vs 2292 and probably 2294

lol and hes still building fleet tongue

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

17 Reply by ed teh monkeh (edited by ed teh monkeh 22-Aug-2009 23:06:28)

  • Posts: 1,005

Re: 2282 and 2288 vs 2292 and probably 2294

lee im sorry, but 92 expod their bankers in our core so i have tons of shares tongue

so keep ur opinions to urself before u know the facts and stop being so pissy. smile cos coolfool can rape ur figs

also lee we r going to war for fun as awesome shark says, there r only 12 days left or w/e and 92 were gonna kill us if they killed 82 , so i thought y not make things interesting.

and stop clearing my portals sad

"Ed's a bit of a trouble maker, in other words, he's an asshole" - Archangel 2007

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 410

Re: 2282 and 2288 vs 2292 and probably 2294

lol of course ed, i think its obvious to everyone that lee has no clue when he posts here. It makes sense to cancel with some savings and fight a 2 v 2 instead of being cancelled on with no savings and end up fighting a 2 v 1 because your allies have been killed.

Both 82 and 88 were just fighting semi active fams to this point and there wasn't much fun in that, so even if we do lose at least we will know we had a good time. Win or lose i have enjoyed this round.

Failure is just delayed success

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,005

Re: 2282 and 2288 vs 2292 and probably 2294

Lee
Solar Commander

Re: 2282 and 2288 vs 2292 and probably 2294
lol and hes still building fleet

so r u but u dont do nything with it lol.

"Ed's a bit of a trouble maker, in other words, he's an asshole" - Archangel 2007

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,005

Re: 2282 and 2288 vs 2292 and probably 2294

ouchies tongue

"Ed's a bit of a trouble maker, in other words, he's an asshole" - Archangel 2007

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

21 Reply by Lee (edited by Lee 24-Aug-2009 01:55:47)

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 2282 and 2288 vs 2292 and probably 2294

Ed, i havent rebuilt anything until tonight, what infil you reading?

also so ur saying all ur planets i blew up was nothing? lol
i cleared all ur major shares kiddo that was the plan, not ti raid bankers all though that time will soon come

gtratz

----------------
-   CAPTURES   -
----------------
29 planet(s) captured by Billie Jean (74 %) (5 retakes).
7 planet(s) captured by Earth Song (47 %).
-------------------
16 from #2276
13 from #2288
4 from #2298
3 from #2299

----------------
-   BLOW-UPS   -
----------------
22 enemy planet(s) blown up by Billie Jean


all blow ups was against you dude and the 13 against 88 was before i grew and didnt blow:P

now the fighting will get more intense, especially now orbit lured u into losing alot of ur fleet smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

22 Reply by ed teh monkeh (edited by ed teh monkeh 24-Aug-2009 03:03:21)

  • Posts: 1,005

Re: 2282 and 2288 vs 2292 and probably 2294

how did he lure  me lol? he has a bigger fleet, got my figs once and hit a load of my portals and i lost a lot of ground as shown by my nw.

and u only took about 10 portals, admittedly killing my spread on ur allies but alot of the captures and blow ups were note on me and u definitely did not need to jump to 10mil nw to clear myself and awesome shark when we were at 4mil nw lol.

"now the fighting will get more intense, especially now orbit lured u into losing alot of ur fleet"

also the fighting gets less intense after u beat the other attackers fleets.


However, enjoy urself lee big_smile i hope u find some competition in ur enemy for ur sakes as well as mine tongue

"Ed's a bit of a trouble maker, in other words, he's an asshole" - Archangel 2007

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,005

Re: 2282 and 2288 vs 2292 and probably 2294

56 from #2287
48 from #2292
4 from #2294

168 to #2287
19 to #2292
6 to #2294

ru-ro sad

"Ed's a bit of a trouble maker, in other words, he's an asshole" - Archangel 2007

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 912
  • Tag points: 41

Re: 2282 and 2288 vs 2292 and probably 2294

I don't quite understand, 2288 why you cancelling a NAP and starting other wars while you're still fighting a current war? tongue

A lifetime of screams

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,034
  • Tag points: 1

Re: 2282 and 2288 vs 2292 and probably 2294

just helping our allies out

✞✝✞ Șώεετ ɖરεᎯɱȘ ✞✝✞

0 Dislike 0 Post Points