• Hon
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 0

Re: 2282 vs 2292

> Lee wrote:

> man all u guys are to soft, he deleted cus i pwned his spread.
death in the family pfft if it the case he would have aided savings.

Sorry no excuse


lee you are a shit ass rubbing it in, if you have a death in the family, obviously he was regretting that he should have spent more time with his RL fam then playing IC. and there is way way much more to life than just IC. i totally understand him in deleting. his fam might lose a couple days of savings but what is more than losing a life? reflect on it dude

RETIRED

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

52 Reply by Lee (edited by Lee 20-Aug-2009 17:34:20)

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 2282 vs 2292

like i told ur mom, u dont know he is telling the truth do ya, why delete? why take the effort to even bother logging in? then going to preferences and then deleting.
tbh i dont really care dont try flame me mate, im not the one that deleted.

Also @Ed u need to get ur facts straight Dude before u even waste ur time posting crap, that isnt what happened at all but ur not far off.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,599

Re: 2282 vs 2292

who's rabbit died?

"It's very quiet on the political arena. I wish someone would stir up some trouble!"

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Hon
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 0

Re: 2282 vs 2292

dude, i dont know what to say about you. and im not trying to flame you or anything like that. i dont even know who the hell are you but seriously you are really very shallow.

probably you dont really care about the people around you. even if zerty is lying or so, are you such a person to be boasting about how good you are at making him delete, than offering him sympathy? no one really gives a damn how good you are seriously. i know zerty, and he aint a deleter just because you cleared a few of his ports as you have mentioned.

RETIRED

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,599

Re: 2282 vs 2292

Hon master of contradiction

"i know zerty, and he aint a deleter"

yes he is...because he deleted.

"It's very quiet on the political arena. I wish someone would stir up some trouble!"

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Hon
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 0

Re: 2282 vs 2292

you chose not to read the whole sentence.

i know zerty, and he aint a deleter (just because you cleared a few of his ports as you have mentioned.)

a deletor beacuse of IC issues is a sore loser, while deleting with specific RL reasons is different.

RETIRED

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

57 Reply by ed teh monkeh (edited by ed teh monkeh 20-Aug-2009 23:30:16)

  • Posts: 1,005

Re: 2282 vs 2292

Also @Ed u need to get ur facts straight Dude before u even waste ur time posting crap, that isnt what happened at all but ur not far off.

i dont see that this makes any sense lol. u say that i posted crap and its not at all wot happened i.e. completely off, but im not far off actaully.

plato i offer my condolences sad

"Ed's a bit of a trouble maker, in other words, he's an asshole" - Archangel 2007

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,005

Re: 2282 vs 2292

kick ass 82, did it start yet, i can see big fleets but no planet changes atm

"Ed's a bit of a trouble maker, in other words, he's an asshole" - Archangel 2007

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 847

Re: 2282 vs 2292

did the war start?
i have not really noted the planet counts, but i have seen a change in NW. 82 second biggest attacker seems to have lost like 6mill NW, can anyone confim this?
Aslo 92 their planet count in general seems to have gone up from 3800+ to 3900+

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 2282 vs 2292

yes he hit a fighter trap and lost alot of droids big_smile

gooooooooo 77 err i mean err 92 i think

k
go

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,005

Re: 2282 vs 2292

grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

"Ed's a bit of a trouble maker, in other words, he's an asshole" - Archangel 2007

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 847

Re: 2282 vs 2292

update!

82 seems to be losing are they not?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 847

Re: 2282 vs 2292

update

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,005

Re: 2282 vs 2292

Week 20, 21, to Middle of Foohon Middle (2292)
I hereby cancel the 48h nap between our fams at tick 20 year 21. attacks and opps may be made at tick 16 (i think) year 22.

Good luck

i sent this message to the leader and 2 vls of 2292

that is 2288 and 2292

"Ed's a bit of a trouble maker, in other words, he's an asshole" - Archangel 2007

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,256
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 2282 vs 2292

Hehe, 2288 asks for a 1-1 then has their allies cancel nap.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 626
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 2282 vs 2292

94 has been opping / attacking 82 since nap cancellation, so the notion of a 1v1 was gone a while back.   

we appreciate that their presence in the conflict could have been greater, but if they were looking for an excuse to get more involved this is it (as the name of the new thread implies).

the fact is as allies we would rather share the fame fate and that's all there is to it.

in any case it will probaly be the biggest war of the round, so just have fun with it  smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 847

Re: 2282 vs 2292

i take it that the war between 88 and 87 is over then?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points