1 (edited by Rin 23-Aug-2009 02:24:09)

Topic: ~~~Current Attacker Ratings~~~

ATTENTION: These stats are opinion of me and a few other ppl, do not take it as the gospel. thx



The ratings are based on 4 stats and out of 10, 10 being the highest and 0 being GTFO



the stats are

1. Intelligence

- measures overall skills and experience, hitting laser trap and losing fleet will ensure that your rating is crap. while knowing most of the attacking tricks and have the ability of screwing over your enemies means you will have a higher rating.

2. Initiative

- measures agression and the ability to seek our ur own target, set up near enemies asking bank for fleet you need, a high initiative means you are not a plain drone that just get told what to do and where to attack and would be clueless without another attacker to guide you. someone who clears enemies before they were spotted, set up raids on bankers destroys fam by setting up next to them will be rated high. those who constantly burns their morale on good targets will also be rated high.

3. Activity

- obvious stat, the more you are on the more successful you will be as an attacker if you have high ratings in both intelligence and initiative, activity measures how long/how often you can be logged in the game, sacrificing sleep and quitting work will net you high rating, desk job also helps.

4. Reliability

- how reliable you are, high rating means you dont delet or go inactive, always completes round, and an important planets needs to be taken by you, you take it without failure. when participating in a raid you log on for it etc



below I will rate the current attackers based on those 4 stats, anyone who likes to add someone for me and my panel to rate are free to nominate their candidates.

[TAGPOINTS AWARDED FOR THIS THREAD]

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

2 (edited by Rin 06-Sep-2009 01:29:09)

Re: ~~~Current Attacker Ratings~~~

**Updated, ratings changed to out of 10 new names added**

Intelligence/initiative/activity/reliability

Explanation will be given for each later on and discussion and debates are welcomed.

You are welcome to challenge those ratings

Rating for activity and reliability is based on when they last played "activishly"

Note: i did not rate myself someone else did ok!



-Alena: 8/7/7/8  total: 30

-Aleph: 8/9/8/5  total: 30

-Archangel: 9/8/8/9  total: 34

-Artic: 5/6/6/5  total: 22

-Bonanza: 6/7/5/6  total: 24

-Br0k3r: 8/8/7/5  total: 28

-Cartel/Lee: 7/8/9/7  total: 31

-Cloud: 8/8/6/4 total: 26

-Clover: 5/3/6/5 total: 19

-Colorado: 7/8/8/7  total: 30

-Destroyyoutoo: 6/4/5/6  total: 21

-Dragonsup: 8/6/7/7  total: 28

-Elbe: 7/9/8/5  total: 29

-elrohir: 9/9/6/8  total: 32

-Emohotpocket: 7/6/7/7  total: 27

-fygaro: 8/6/6/8  total: 28

-Generalskulls: 8/8/6/8  total: 30

-Genesis: 10/8/5/5  total: 28

-Glue: 7/8/8/6  total: 29

-Hardcore4yearsago: 9/10/8/5  total: 32

-ic death: 6/7/6/4  total: 23

-Lexuzis: 7/4/6/4  total: 21

-lew lew: 9/8/6/8  total: 31

-Lohan: 6/6/8/8  total: 28

-Luster: 7/7/7/6  total: 27

-Lyvidian: 11/11/11/11 total: 44

-Metrex: 6/6/8/9  total: 29

-Middle: 9/8/9/8  total: 34

-noir: 9/6/5/5  total: 25

-Nolio: 6/4/5/3  total: 18

-Orbit: 10/9/7/9  total: 35

-Portgas: 8/7/6/7  total: 28

-Primo: 6/4/8/8  Total: 26

-Rain: 7/6/6/6  total: 25

-Rizzy: 7/9/8/4 total: 28

-roxanne: 8/8/7/9 total: 32

-Sado: 8/10/8/8  total: 34

-Scorp: 6/6/7/4  total: 23

-Smartz: 7/6/8/9  total: 30

-Snailsex: 7/7/8/6  total: 28

-Teddy: 4/5/6/4  total: 19

-telrik: 8/6/8/7  total: 29

-Templare: 8/5/8/9  total: 30

-Tico:  9/8/4/6  total: 27

-Torqez: 10/9/8/8  total: 35

-Tryme: 1/1/1/1  total: 4

-Tsunami: 7/9/8/6  total: 30

-Tymo: 8/9/10/7  total: 34

-Whiteshadow: 8/7/10/9  total: 34

-Zanharim: 8/7/7/8  total: 30

-Zidi: 10/9/6/5  total: 30

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

Re: ~~~Current Attacker Ratings~~~

too bad im no longer an attacker i would own this rankings smile

draculas> my daughter just made cheerleading squad
Squeaky> ...is she hot?
draculas> shes 12 sicko
Squeaky> oh damn

Re: ~~~Current Attacker Ratings~~~

I consider Rin/Parrot/Lyvidian to be well involved in the game.  One of the better ones out there atm.  This will be based on his opinion (so take that into account).

But in my opinion, his assessment is usually pretty accurate.  This should be interesting!

Let the flaming begin big_smile

Re: ~~~Current Attacker Ratings~~~

not  bad at all

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

Re: ~~~Current Attacker Ratings~~~

this rating is not really fair.

You only rate the players you know, im not on it and im doing alot of attacks.

there for, this rating aint really a rating, but really a friend to friend rating if you ask me.
There are many more attackers who are doing a great job who are not on this list.

How do you measure these stats anyway?

Re: ~~~Current Attacker Ratings~~~

next to be added

-Generalskulls
-Emohotpocket
-Snailex
-Porta
-ic death
-lew lew
-fygaro
-noir

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

Re: ~~~Current Attacker Ratings~~~

if he doesn't know you, then you probably aren't important

Re: ~~~Current Attacker Ratings~~~

> gfhjdhj wrote:

> this rating is not really fair.

> You only rate the players you know, im not on it and im doing alot of attacks.

> there for, this rating aint really a rating, but really a friend to friend rating if you ask me.
> There are many more attackers who are doing a great job who are not on this list.

> How do you measure these stats anyway?


if me or none of my friend knows you how do i give u a fair assessment???

the ratings are explained in the first post

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

Re: ~~~Current Attacker Ratings~~~

ill vouch for gfhjdhj

i only know him from this round, but he's done quite well for our fam.

and i also disagree that if you guys dont know someone then they arent important. myself, and a number of players ive shared rounds with over the past 9 years are good attackers, yet because we dont bs in the forums or irc you may never know us.

11

Re: ~~~Current Attacker Ratings~~~

Cand you mark cloud's reliability rating down to say -32? Every round is active for a couple weeks and then deletes.

btw

CLOUD YOU BASTARD DELETER!

Rehabilitated IC developer

Re: ~~~Current Attacker Ratings~~~

''if he doesn't know you, then you probably aren't important''

ok, that explains it all. Good comment by the way.


''if me or none of my friend knows you how do i give u a fair assessment???

the ratings are explained in the first post''

Yes, how does one give a fair assesment?
What i ment with measureing stats is, how do you know if Zidi is less active then Elbe for examble?


Maybe it was better if i did not post anything in this thread, this is only going to bring up a discussion, this thread was supose to be fun.

Re: ~~~Current Attacker Ratings~~~

well u can do ur assessment based on my stats, or do u just want me to give them random ratings since i ve never played with or against them?

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

Re: ~~~Current Attacker Ratings~~~

> gfhjdhj wrote:

> ''if he doesn't know you, then you probably aren't important''

ok, that explains it all. Good comment by the way.


''if me or none of my friend knows you how do i give u a fair assessment???

the ratings are explained in the first post''

Yes, how does one give a fair assesment?
What i ment with measureing stats is, how do you know if Zidi is less active then Elbe for examble?


Maybe it was better if i did not post anything in this thread, this is only going to bring up a discussion, this thread was supose to be fun.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

i ve played with/against both elbe and zidi.

also king's comment has nothing to do with me

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

Re: ~~~Current Attacker Ratings~~~

> Petrolstone wrote:

> Cand you mark cloud's reliability rating down to say -32? Every round is active for a couple weeks and then deletes.

btw

CLOUD YOU BASTARD DELETER!

im pretty sure cloud deleted the one round i was with him... though he did well until that point, lol.

Re: ~~~Current Attacker Ratings~~~

Genesis is rated way too high

-Genesis
5/5/1/1

is more like it.. he goes inactive often, underestimates his family members,
He is good if he isn't inactive and logs on, other than than it's just a vet wasting a spot tongue

~~Lemming of leather and lollipops~~

Right, so what are we waiting for?  Can we get this going?  Any other feedback?

Re: ~~~Current Attacker Ratings~~~

i'd say give the gigantic homo some tagpoints but he's already got that gay tag so no point

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

Re: ~~~Current Attacker Ratings~~~

mine would be 3/2/4/3

draculas> my daughter just made cheerleading squad
Squeaky> ...is she hot?
draculas> shes 12 sicko
Squeaky> oh damn

Re: ~~~Current Attacker Ratings~~~

Btw I have the priviledge of giving out the highest rating.

If you disagree with me, you're welcome to voice your opinion.

Re: ~~~Current Attacker Ratings~~~

How come the rating changed from first post to now on some players?

Re: ~~~Current Attacker Ratings~~~

*sigh Lyv, u know me better than that dude

Re: ~~~Current Attacker Ratings~~~

Middle wrote:

How come the rating changed from first post to now on some players?

hm?

Re: ~~~Current Attacker Ratings~~~

id boost colorado on reliability, so far this round EXTREMELY reliable tongue

Leap ahead

Re: ~~~Current Attacker Ratings~~~

yes i ve heard that from multiple ppl now smile

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

Re: ~~~Current Attacker Ratings~~~

Me Me!!