Topic: 2253 vs 2257

Vultures stay out, especially Xertem and Nir

The Great Chupacubra has spoken!

Re: 2253 vs 2257

pretty sure i got to them first!

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

Re: 2253 vs 2257

yeah we did i have attack reports lol from last yaer

"Heh heh heh heh heh heh!"

Metrex

4 (edited by Theos 18-Jul-2009 15:44:17)

Re: 2253 vs 2257

This war already ended with 48 & 51 attacking us (57) during the 48h cancellation of the NAP between 53 & 57. You might have noticed our drop in NW and planet count during that time. We had no recuperation time due to the fact that both 48 & 51 already have a fleet from there skirmish on 66 and that it was a sudden shift in their target, which was not surprisingly also a 2 vs 1. Even when I build up my fleet once again, a fighterrun was already at my door.

From what I see in my fam news, it's now more like 48 - 51 - 53 - even 55 vs 57.

Re: 2253 vs 2257

@57

start using ur diplo skills thanks. msg xertem and a free nap might be on the table. the more you know.

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

Re: 2253 vs 2257

There are NAPs made for a reason and NAPs not made for a reason, in our case it's expanding. Due to early attacks during expo fase, we had to move south. Also we must secure a core, meaning clearing out intruders in our newly moved core. Should we have NAPped the families there, our size would be decreased and our core in potentially danger environment. Do note that we were a small family that grow up by small attacks. We only made up on ranks due to other families being destroyed by wars.

Of course there is a free NAP on the table with both 48 & 51, now that you have taken your share.

Re: 2253 vs 2257

if you are Microsoft check your ingame smile

"Heh heh heh heh heh heh!"

Metrex

Re: 2253 vs 2257

No, I am Los.

Re: 2253 vs 2257

protip: u dont have to use shares to attack i am fine attacking well into the 5 tick range just so u know.

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

Re: 2253 vs 2257

plus im still at 1 tick range for a bunch of you

"Heh heh heh heh heh heh!"

Metrex

Re: 2253 vs 2257

> Rin wrote:

> protip: u dont have to use shares to attack i am fine attacking well into the 5 tick range just so u know.


If this is a response to something I wrote above, read it again.
If this is a response not to something above, this should be in the thread "Strategy".
If you think I did not get what you mean with this, please clarify.

If you consider yourself a "pro" because you can attack at a 5 tick range, then there are many other "pro's" and people surpassing these 5-ticks-pro's.

Re: 2253 vs 2257

you are making it sound like we are napping you cause we wont be gaining anything. we are napping you out of free will if u wish to take it, i am fine with taking another 100 planets, just dont bitch about it then.

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

Re: 2253 vs 2257

i agree this is good will Los not because we will lose from this

"Heh heh heh heh heh heh!"

Metrex

14 (edited by Theos 18-Jul-2009 16:43:14)

Re: 2253 vs 2257

> Rin wrote:

> you are making it sound like we are napping you cause we wont be gaining anything. we are napping you out of free will if u wish to take it, i am fine with taking another 100 planets, just dont bitch about it then.


Then you've read it wrong, we know all too well that you can take alot more. The statement was about you taking enough from this fam and now trying to act honorable by giving us a "free" NAP.

Should you want to take an other 100 planets, do know that 53 is attacking us now (read the title of this thread should you still not know). So should you attack, you would be known as what is called vultures.

Re: 2253 vs 2257

even though we were hitting you earlier ?

This war already ended with 48 & 51 attacking us (57) during the 48h cancellation of the NAP between 53 & 57

thats what you said in other words they wernt hitting you 48 hours prior to now which means we were...and you call us vultures lol

los theres this thread in Uni called 2248 napbreakers its where all the whiners go sad please post in there

"Heh heh heh heh heh heh!"

Metrex

Re: 2253 vs 2257

A war ends with an agreement from both sides and both sides not attacking each other, I see that not happening. What was stated above, says that we know that we would lose before it starts. Besides, who am I to call off a war on my own?

If you think that I call you a vulture, please read again, apparently you guys don't read all too well. It means that should you attack again knowing that 53 is already attacking us, then you'd be considered a vulture. It is different than calling someone a vulture, because one is achieved by just name calling, one by it's own deeds.

And whining is not the same as stating the facts of what happened and how it is. You are just too sensitive about this whining stuff, seeing things as complains against you, along with your bullying behaviour.

Re: 2253 vs 2257

"
If you think that I call you a vulture, please read again, apparently you guys don't read all too well. It means that should you attack again knowing that 53 is already attacking us, then you'd be considered a vulture. I"

doesnt this make 53 the vulture since we attacked first?

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

Re: 2253 vs 2257

http://www.imperialconflict.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=71915

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

Re: 2253 vs 2257

http://www.imperialconflict.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=71915

"Heh heh heh heh heh heh!"

Metrex

Re: 2253 vs 2257

it doesn't, as when i'm cancelled the nap you weren't fighting yet -_-

The Great Chupacubra has spoken!

Re: 2253 vs 2257

but we were when you posted the war thread :<

also
http://www.imperialconflict.com/forum/v

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

Re: 2253 vs 2257

yes we were..... you just started hitting them

we were hitting them a day ago that means we had 24 hours on you guys

"Heh heh heh heh heh heh!"

Metrex

Re: 2253 vs 2257

and i cancelled 24 hours before that, which means you start hitting AFTER i cancelled, that makes you vultures smile

The Great Chupacubra has spoken!

Re: 2253 vs 2257

yeah Rin is a mind reader and we knew that it wasnt public knowledge why do you post this thread now then instead of 48 hours ago unless you knew you were gona get shoved outa this because we are right and you are wrong lol

"Heh heh heh heh heh heh!"

Metrex

Re: 2253 vs 2257

we are trying to win most dishonorable anyway

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?