Re: Sparta vs Rome!!!
meh, our alliance gets the credit.
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Universal News → Sparta vs Rome!!!
very well zen take a nap...zen fire ze missilez!
(53 & 65 vs 60 & 64) :0:0
/me checks thread title.... and sees nothing to do with 60 or 64 or 65 ![]()
Oh come on guys this 53 we are talking about ,like its any surprise that they are doing this.Personally i m even more surprised that they arent doing more screwed up stuff
hmmm, someone sore because they got beaten on?
tbh, im sick of whining people who could moan for a living
it's not often that i go back to my limp bizkit days but....
ahem
their "mouths are writing checks that their fists cant cash"
*bow*
nap was offered, both sides offered one that is, CF was agreed upon... 67 goes ahead and breaks the CF...
2267 i know asked a nap. No reply from Alltime of 2253. 2267 would have been happy with a nap. Why not nap fam more than 3 times size. You lie.
I asked for 50 planets for a pnap... this is what i get back:
Week 41, 11
my fam has decided that we can offer 40 planets for terms to a pnap. They will include all of alexander the great's planets which we will take then hand over to you. And we will also add 12 planets of our own which will solely come from systems that have the two fams you requested.
Signed, easonwannabe of Constantine I (2267)
----
Cf had been signed, and spartacus goes ahead and hits us whilst the CF is in place...
Fair enough that u got a nap. Wasnt there for that. But still why beat on a fam 1/3 ur size in first place just cause they retaliate to u taking like 20 of their planets. Yes ur bigger but dont gotta be bullies with no honour.
You took 20 of 2267 banker planet first. Like i said they just retaliate. No need to beat on them.
its imperial CONFLICT. we haven't raped you guys... we have taken maybe 25-30 planets. stop whining over such a small loss. its less than a 10th of your size. if we were "beating on you" we would have taken 100 planets.
since spartacus was the dummy that messed up the CF to begin with.... perhaps he should give up the 40-50 planets himself and then we can have the NAP and be done with it entirely
Yes this is this is imperial CONFLICT not imperial ONLY PICK FIGHTS YOU KNOW YOU CAN WIN as it is currently played.
so we are supposed to let you hit our bankers and not hit you back since it would be picking a fight we know we could win? nice logic
Flash. You hit 2267 banker first. Dont farm small fams 1/3 your nw. So because u bigger you can take planet without retaliation. And if you did attack bigger fam and they retaliate you wouldnt declare war for it.
Thus in ur defending imperial CONFLICT you are practicing imperial DIPLOMACY
is it our fault if the adversary we're fighting is not a challenge? sounds more like your problem than ours ![]()
> zerty wrote:
>
Thus in ur defending imperial CONFLICT you are practicing imperial DIPLOMACY
aren't you the one that told us we should sign a nap instead of "fighting someone 1/3 our size"
Well why not go find a "challenge" and let 2267 find a "challenge" they have a chance of winning so that maybe later towards end of round if they won a few "challenges" they could grow to a level to give you yet another "challenge" and everyone could have fun!!:D
Imperial Forum → Universal News → Sparta vs Rome!!!
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.