Re: World Twenty20
"Broad only got 3 overs"
Incase he has to hit the stumps again...
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → General → World Twenty20
"Broad only got 3 overs"
Incase he has to hit the stumps again...
![]()
Although look at his figures
Broad 3.0 0 17 3
I know England won but I still don't think we are playing our best XI. We used 6 bowlers without Collingwood, Pietersen or Bopara bowling who are all useful part time bowlers which suggests to me that we could axe a bowler and stick another batsman in there. I think playing two spinners is a bit of a luxery when Pietersen is capable as a part time spinner. I think Graham Napier should be in for one of the spinners (probably Adil Rashid).
Anyway, GOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Sri Lanka, GOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Ireland ![]()
Well done Ireland!
the last time a minister led an English sortie to annihilation at the hands of the Dutch, a royal named Charles covered for him (William Penn, 1660)
Coincidence??? I smell conspiracy!!!!
It's ok, we beat Pakistan. England learnt long ago to only fight countries it could colonise, not other colonial powers who could actually put up a fight. They should have paid more attention in history!
Hard ![]()
to who?
pakistan...
LOL by 84 runs i think lol
Lol they must have been dancing the conga as they ran bases
well, this is actually a logical result ![]()
i mean, in holland 6000 people play cricket, in pakistan more like 60 mil.
yea on the street it doesnt count lol
lol why doesnt pakistan have the best team in the world then lol
Maybe they do
Metrex, it isn't only that, but the odds that you can find a full team of good players in a pool of say 6 mil cricket players are significantly higher than finding a full team of good players in a pool of 6000 players. The smaller the pool, the smaller the chance of top players too. And it's a vicious circle... maybe, if i had the posibility to play cricket when i was young (cricket team in the area, or people to play with) i would have been the best cricket player in the world now. no way of knowing, cause i never had the chance to find out.
why doesnt america have a team.....whats the population of america........lol
cause the game is not popular in the USA, like it isn't in holland
noone playing it means noone gets good at it
> Metrex wrote:
> why doesnt america have a team.....whats the population of america........lol <
It's too complex for them.
South Africa are gonna smush England tomorrow ;P
Metrex, India has a population of 1 billion people, that is why Pakistan aren't the best team in the world ![]()
...and most likely pixies yes
Imperial Forum → General → World Twenty20
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.