I agree with Acolyte. There must be a cute girl where you live who you could take to dinner and a movie.
And xeno... sorry, but I'm going to decline on that one. I was going to start transcribing it for you, but it just got to be a pain in the ass, and frankly, probably utter garbage.
However, I will transcribe the second link for you, only because it's pretty easy: It's simply a black screen, with the following words popping up.
I have done some slight editting, only to correct the spelling and grammar issues in this.
We have established that the swine flu is man made. Please see my 4 part video on my channel. Some of you alraedy know this, but for those that don't, the drug which everyone will be rushing to get, even though it will have no effect whatsoever is called Tamiflu, also known as Oseltamivir.
I will add all the necessary links in the info for you to check.
DO NOT TAKE Tamiflu.
Authorities urge caution over Tamiflu fears.
Dated The World Today-Tuesday, 21 April, 2009
Reporter: Oscar McLaren
For now, though, the only country which sees Tamiflu prescribed on a regular basis for the flu is Japan, where there have been reports of children going so far as trying to jump from balconies after taking the drug over there.
Please see the link in info.
TAMIFLU CAUSES
NEUROPSYCHIATRIC
EVENTS IN THE BRAIN
Let's look at who owns major shares in Tamiflu.
Donald Rumsfeld
http://money.cnn.com/2005/10/31/news/newsmakers/fortune_rumsfeld
Bilderberg member George Shultz
In fact, the federal government is emerging as one of the world's biggest customers for Tamiflu.
Are any warning bells ringing yet?
Your illness=their profit
The world we live in today has been designed to create illness and war.
Because it makes evil sociopaths
Money
Please wake up
My response to this would be a few things:
A: How do they know Tamiflu is the prescribed medication against swine flu right now? Most people have been taking orange juice and sleep to treat it. I bet that's another plot by the government: the government is poisoning our oranges and planning on nuking our imaginations, right?
B: The Rumsfeld citation is terrible.
A: It's from 2005. Shit changes between now and then with regard to stocks. Until proponents of this theory bring a more up to date piece of evidence, it should be regarded as crap.
B: That was talking about Avian flu, not Swine flu. That's like saying that a medication will work for the common cold, so we'll use it to treat AIDS.
C: The article itself says soldiers were going to be given Tamiflu. That means, one way or another, this theory is empirically denied. Either:
A: The soldiers were given Tamiflu, and since there haven't been reported cases of complications from Tamiflu in US soldiers since then, the medication is safe, or:
B: The soldiers were not given Tamiflu, which means even when Rumsfeld had the opportunity to profit from his position as Secretary of Defense, he didn't take it, so there's no reason the same drug that was rejected earlier would suddenly be propped up to fight Swine flu unless it was shown that Tamiflu was uniquely effective against Swine flu.
D: Read the article. It cites a number of ways that Rumsfeld backed off of his connections with the drug company. Let me make this clear. HE WAS NOT THE DECISIONMAKER HERE.
Make Eyes Great Again!
The Great Eye is watching you... when there's nothing good on TV...