Re: ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 49 ~
actually maxatron u are too inactive lately to even claim to be a villian, tho I like your try ![]()
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Universal News → ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 49 ~
actually maxatron u are too inactive lately to even claim to be a villian, tho I like your try ![]()
Eh....I talk alot when I get into Z whiskey. Take alot of planets too. But the truth is I won't have to time next round to make such an event happen..so I will most likely go into hiding and nuke people.
beers i will hunt you down still.
look for the quantom if you want to find beers
and top of teh page again? ![]()
LOL @Frenzy
15 Frenzy United Hamza Hanief 0 1030
![]()
I want to see maxatron play a villain... and then get crushed for sucking.
well ladies, gentlemen and the occasional idiot (okay more often than not!!!!)
it seems, my time here in pinwheel, is coming to a close! i will be stepping away from pinwheel and probably IC after this round has finished and after ICPG is over. to all i have played with/against i bid you farwell! i have made a lot of friends, and not many enemies. i had a lot of fun, and if i were to list all the people here that i would like to remember then i could be here way into next round!! you know who you are, either i played with you or against you or both. i keep in contact on msn with most. i would like to say farwell
and also, i am gonna have a fun packed nuking last 4 days
6 digit agents here i come ![]()
6 digits? so......
100,000?
You might want to retire more spectacularly ![]()
/me laughs at Flashy's joke ![]()
He will be back next round ![]()
yeah shutup flashy your rerandoming, god wtf is with every one quiting ><
> maxatron wrote:
"next rd will be my last rd and im playing dirty guys,im going to be a villian and smack you in the mouth when your vunerable.
ill be leading next rd and my family will fall under my iron fist or delete.
im tired of pw being a place to relax."
Eh, this sounds just like Minor Threats, from old MW. That guy and his sidekick, Faceslicer, would kill their own fam members just to get planets.
I had a bit of grudging respect for the guy. He had honor, just of his own type. Part of his honor,was openly, and honestly admitting he had no honor and acting accordingly.
I played the White Knight, to his Black, and we had fun with the roles. I would go to Galactic Congress, and challenge him to duels, and all that. The role play was as much fun as the actual game.
I actually miss the honorless bastard.
Eh, and as to Frenzy : I have played both with Cloud, and against him. I know of what I say.
You and Whisperer are confusing the use of skill and ability and knowledge, with the use of brute force and overpowering amounts of fleet.
When I do nearly as well, with 1/10th the fleet, what does that say?
It's easy to atk and win, when you are in a large fam, and you have 5 mil NW in fleet, and 50 planets, and bankers who back you to the hilt. (Ask Torn Prince)
It's quite a bit harder, and requires far more skill to do the same,, with 500k in fleet, and 100 planets, and your bankers cant spare regular cash, so you sell res, just for upkeep. Which means you cant even replace fleet losses, let alone jump to more.
Tho this may sound like a whine, but my thrust is this : I do as much or more with far less.
The atk who does the most with the least, has the most skill and ability. I posted similar here way earlier, and Cloud did not get it.
A good atker, conserves his fleet, atks wisely, and does not do massive frontal atks throwing away fleet, and expecting their banks and res to replace it. Every atk should count. Every atk should be one step closer to the goal of defeating your enemy, not helping him defeat you.
A good player takes the fam he gets, and makes the most of it, not deleting at the drop of a hat, or on a whim.
> Render wrote:
> actually maxatron u are too inactive lately to even claim to be a villian, tho I like your try ![]()
i cant help we are pnap`d to all top fams.
I've played both with/against Cloud and with/against hummy both on numerous occasions in the past few rounds, and I can say with absolute certainty that Cloud is better than you in attacking, hummy, in fact the last 3 rounds you have not impressed me at all as an attacker.
6 digit agents? Thats pathetic! Get 7 digits and then give Frenzy's favourite banker a nuke on the strike of the hour, every hour!
oh thanks Flash now i get it ![]()
you have 0000001 agents
> Suspicious Whisperer wrote:
> I've played both with/against Cloud and with/against hummy both on numerous occasions in the past few rounds, and I can say with absolute certainty that Cloud is better than you in attacking, hummy, in fact the last 3 rounds you have not impressed me at all as an attacker.
Your opinion is a good as mine.
But do a favor, and compare total fleets for those last three rounds, then use that ratio for comparing total atks and takes and retakes.. My point is not total takes, or most infra or fleet destroyed, or biggest infra, or biggest fleet matter. It is who does the most with what they have that matters. Compare planet counts and NW and use those ratios to figure against total atks, retakes and takes.
My point is: It is damned easy to atk and be successful when you have huge fleet and huge banker backing, but harder to do the same with out that. It takes skill to do as I do. I have NEVER had more than 90k figs. (except that one eor jump, and was never used for atks) Name any other atk who can claim that? Same with soldiers (200k max) an droids (the same)
I do my damndest with as little as I can. Can you say that of Cloud? Or any other atker? I constantly see atkers wasting fleet and expecting bankers and resses to make up the loss.
And, the final nail in the coffin: As an atk, do you delete and leave your fam (for ANY reason?) ? I NEVER delete. I Take the fam I get, and make the best of it. I fight to my last planet for my fam. Who else claims that? How many times did Cloud delete in the last three rounds? How many did I? Think. Which atk would you rather have? Me? who sticks with you forever? Or Cloud, who deletes at the least implulse.
The best atk isnt the one with the most takes
if you'd have the above mentioned skill, maybe you would have a huge banker ?
Then u wouldn't have to whine about your fleet being too small either!
the best attacker is in fact the one with the most takes and is able to hold on to them.
it doesnt matter what size of fleet you have. what matter most is the activity that you put into this game and attacking whenever you can. if you have a small fleet, still you can be a good attacker and grab those planets from players around your NW. and same goes if you have a mega huge fleet, although it is much easier but you cant take as many planets if you are just looking at soft targets half or less than half your NW. theres a reason for morale to be there. it balances the gameplay and makes it fairer for everyone. simple as that.
You don't have to convince me of what you did or didn't do, I was in PW the last few rounds and I have been your allies/fam or generally keeping up with what you have done versus what some of the other attackers. I'm just giving my objective point of view.
For example, Hon and Tryme > hummy last round
Did you even know which fam they were in, respectively? ![]()
But Tryme is sucking in Capri!
I even had to give him spread!!
lol tryme sucks major ![]()
![]()
and hummy, didn't i just pwn you and clear a whole system and im a banker ![]()
somehow hummy (like last round) remains as our eor discussion. ![]()
Imperial Forum → Universal News → ~ Pretenders Vs. Contenders Pinwheel Round 49 ~
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.