Topic: IMMORTALS (2188) vs the Misfits (2167)

After a nice war during BoR the top family has decided that 48H naps dont mean anything and is warring us again..

Anyone else getting tired of this game by now...

Lineage

Re: IMMORTALS (2188) vs the Misfits (2167)

Please copy/paste the agreed 48 H NAP... you cant, because one was never agreed to nor signed.

Re: IMMORTALS (2188) vs the Misfits (2167)

Week 45, 3

THIS IS SENT TO ALL 2167 MEMBERS

Zanharim has gone

we will offer a Nap for 10 planets and not bother your fam ever again

The nuking Zanharim did was rather annoying, so thats why we ask 10 planets. Explore us 10, shouldnt be hard for an entire fam.

Thank you.

Signed, EDWARD CULLEN of IMMORTAL EDWARD (2188)
   
Save    
Week 25, 3

well do a 48 hr nap we dont plan on farming you, look how small you guys are compared to us but your right zan is an idiot thats why im telling you guys if u change leaders well give u a 48 hr nap

Signed, oh of IMMORTAL BOSS (2188)
    Reply
Save    
Week 25, 3

we will do a 48 H nap, PNAP is out of the question though

Signed, oh of IMMORTAL BOSS (2188)

Lineage

Re: IMMORTALS (2188) vs the Misfits (2167)

not an official nap sorry. if thats all you have

Creator of Pretenders vs Contenders

Re: IMMORTALS (2188) vs the Misfits (2167)

We were very careful in how we worded it, i think this might be the first time i agree and respect something jets said, hes right.

Re: IMMORTALS (2188) vs the Misfits (2167)

1 IMMORTALS (2188)  984 3173189 55162

25 the Misfits (2167)  322 705595 15176



lol

Sex without the e is still SX!

Re: IMMORTALS (2188) vs the Misfits (2167)

they were rank 2 before we attacked lol

Re: IMMORTALS (2188) vs the Misfits (2167)

hahaha

Sex without the e is still SX!

Re: IMMORTALS (2188) vs the Misfits (2167)

this is the dumbest and lowest thing i have ever seen happen in this game. it's already bad enough with the fact that half the fams in the galaxy have less than 5 active members, but now we have a full fam of active people picking on a fam with about 2 actives when the galaxy isn't anywhere near fully explored yet.

Re: IMMORTALS (2188) vs the Misfits (2167)

aye l2write naps =p

Colorado: even in the 11/01 war i made more hits.
Colorado: 447 blow jobs.
Big Gary:  Only a fool cannot admit when he's wrong...
AW:    i love rim jobs
RisingDown: I know you do

Re: IMMORTALS (2188) vs the Misfits (2167)

this game needs to add a rule that makes fams not able to attack other fams that are WAY below their networth/size so little fams rounds don't get ruined from having the #1 fam near them in the galaxy

Re: IMMORTALS (2188) vs the Misfits (2167)

so its a low thing because you guys werent able to organize like we were? sorry, next time ill make sure my entire family plays independently like yours.

Re: IMMORTALS (2188) vs the Misfits (2167)

lesson to smaller families: NEVER agree NAP with a top fam unless it's a PNAP. even then, be careful. your best bet at any point is to fight back, retake, and use your smaller planet count/nw to be really annoying.

A lifetime of screams

Re: IMMORTALS (2188) vs the Misfits (2167)

Show some messages where you agreed to the 48 hour nap.

I dont think there is enough evedence that a nap was agreed by both sides from what I read here.

Re: IMMORTALS (2188) vs the Misfits (2167)

the only problem with fighting back is we're such a tiny fam and no one ever does anything we say to try to coordinate ourselves for an attack. so we have about 5 (probably less) active members and only 2 actually listen to coordinating things. whereas the immortals all are on the same page and active because they got lucky and got put in a good fam which never happens to me : ( so they can ruin a lot of others rounds because they were unlucky and got put in a fam with a bunch of people who are never online and can't do any retaking

Re: IMMORTALS (2188) vs the Misfits (2167)

lame..........very lame

top 1 must farm the 25th family to win........how low can you go?

Noobie

17 (edited by ~[PW9]KT~ 17-May-2009 05:02:55)

Re: IMMORTALS (2188) vs the Misfits (2167)

[no discussing blocks in the forums]

Re: IMMORTALS (2188) vs the Misfits (2167)

Well, you don't know all the facts to really call it farming. We haven't seen any war reports, there's no proof of a nap, nothing. Just seems to me that 67 fails.

Sex without the e is still SX!

Re: IMMORTALS (2188) vs the Misfits (2167)

Yes Josh =p

But that seems to happen every round in a big gary fam lol

Sex without the e is still SX!

Re: IMMORTALS (2188) vs the Misfits (2167)

Actully, this is the second time they warred us.. look, we are a small fam, we arent noobs, we have like 2 active players. I am waiting for message my leader has from the nap agreement, i was told one was sign, but i am not sure about it, hell my leader just elected vice leaders today.

The only thing that 88 has sent to tell us they were declearing war was..

Week 45, 6

you can die

Signed, EDWARD CULLEN of IMMORTAL EDWARD (2188)

and war reports...

----------------
-   CAPTURES   -
----------------
8 planet(s) captured by Darkmasses (80 %) (4 retakes).
-------------------
8 from #2188
-------------------
We overwhelmed the enemy 8 times. 1 families and 8 planet(s) involved.
We actually gained 6 planet(s) in total. Unfortunately they managed to retake 2.

----------------
-   BLOW-UPS   -
----------------

4 planet(s) from helpme have been blown up.
1 planet(s) from Empleh have been blown up.

List of destroyed planets:
59,106:15 - 65,107:22 - 58,103:17 - 63,111:11 - 58,103:18 -


---------------
-   DEFEATS   -
---------------
44 planet(s) lost by Empleh
22 planet(s) lost by helpme
9 planet(s) lost by Incognition
5 planet(s) lost by Darkmasses
4 planet(s) lost by BlueMonkey
3 planet(s) lost by Earth Armada
2 planet(s) lost by BlindGuardian
1 planet(s) lost by Tashira
1 planet(s) lost by MonK
-------------------
79 to #2188
10 to #2194
2 to #2196
-------------------
We have been beaten 91 times. 3 families and 90 planets involved.
We actually lost 87 planet(s) in total. At least we were able to retake 3.


does this count or should i put something more specified?

Lineage

Re: IMMORTALS (2188) vs the Misfits (2167)

more specified

Re: IMMORTALS (2188) vs the Misfits (2167)

please dont go into more details. we dont want to know if the populations in the captured planets are being used as a sex slave or or whatever X(.

i love you all!

Re: IMMORTALS (2188) vs the Misfits (2167)

ok sooooo, after looking at your ranks in the past couple pvc's, I'd have to say that 88 did indeed farm you. Tsk tsk tsk, shame they can't beat on ppl their own size. Well they'll get theirs soon.

Sex without the e is still SX!

Re: IMMORTALS (2188) vs the Misfits (2167)

Lol thats some low shit from 2188... Just look at what Neuch says, "we were very carefull with the wording"

So basicly his plan was to get 67 to think they had a nap, and then farm them when they felt like it, because they had created a loophole? Its just as bad as an outright napbreak.. But coming from Gary and Mark its not really a surprise

LORD HELP OREGON

Re: IMMORTALS (2188) vs the Misfits (2167)

Nolio does that kinda stuff too!